Most Controversial Forummer of the Year - Nominations

[ParraMatt]

I agree.. Without Rhinos this comp is a Disgrace ;-) Jokes.

Thanks for the words but Raider_69.

Oh and my vote goes to Red Dragon

 

[Collateral]

MattO

Will he turn up to the awards night or will he send one of those "sorry I couldn't make it messages"?

He should probably present the award.

 

[The Backpacker]

MattO

Will he turn up to the awards night or will he send one of those "sorry I couldn't make it messages"?

He should probably present the award.

Word on the street is he's boycotting the awards due to a pay dispute. But you never know, he may just turn up on the night. ;-)

Nominations thus far...

Anastabation
Dragon Fanatic 4 nominations
Lord Reynoldson 3 nominations
ParraMatt 3 nominations
MattO
Red Dragon
Keep the nominations coming...

 

[The Engineers Room]

Personally, I don't care whether you wear flannel, leather, Armani or a pink feather boa with high heels, I'm just not that kind of bloke. :shock: No matter what your stereotypes say. 8-[

My point is that I don't wear flanno and jeans. I never have. Sure I love the west but Parramatta fans have to put up with so much of this shit due to a few hooligans that support the team with us. Parramatta is quite civilised.

 

[Raider_69]

if that matto nomination isnt my, put my vote down to matto!

runined a good comp!

 

[Raider_69]

Now that I'm sure I'm not going to get tarred and feathered or create a lolly scramble of epic proportions, I'd like to nominate the good Lord Reynoldson for most controversial forummer of the year.

This is the man that had the hide to show his face at Easts leagues club after taking the favourite son Hodge's name in vain and made implications of a tarnished halo all while running out under the biblical colours of red, white and blue. And, while he can be forgiven for his Bulldog salary cap claims, he's due the penance of wearing a warning for the next year, of a blasphemiser of contraversial proportions.

Justin Hodges? Oh yeah, I remember him. That loud mouth Easts player that got a little bruise on his knee so had to sit out for the whole season. Hey, as I said in my article, he should'e been suspended for the season, that injury was just Karma. :lol: :lol: :lol:

It was also claiming that the Roosters should have lost their premiership I think. :lol: :lol: :lol: And I'm surprised that my latest Andrew Johns is all talk and definitely not the best player in the world thing didn't get a mention here. :lol: :lol: :lol:

And what do you mean by the "good Lord Reynoldson"? I've never heard of him.

Say it Lord - Hodges is my favourite player. I'm sorry he was injured by the evil sandcorp turf. Easts were rightful winners in 2002...You can do it.

Go to hell. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I assume that Dragon Fanatic was the one who plageurised their post? If it's a vote for most controversial off field forumer, I'll vote for Dragon Fanatic just ahead of ParraMatt's poaching.

If this is a vote for on-field controversy, well, I've been told I should be nominated for that. DOWN WITH JUSTIN HODGES! (Whoops, I shouldn't say that too loudly, some team-mates may hear me. :lol: :lol: :lol: But there is always rules against nominating yourself, so I have no idea who to choose if it's "on-field" controversy.

Saddly I agree with you. I feel that nothing he has done has affected the forum sevens. Just ruffled a few feathers (sorry about the pun) over at the cafe district.

And Andrew Johns is sooooo overrated. One day we will all realise.

I am assuming by your comment DvdHntr, that you are referring to Lord Reynoldson's nomination in this post?

Could you please direct me to the section where it says that the person nominated has to have 'done' something to affect the sevens. Whilst any number of people could have been nominated regarding their 'off field' behaviour, I chose to use my nomination to choose someone who was disputatious 'on field'. I am assuming you read every one of his articles this year and obviously have a different opinion to mine as to what you'd consider controversial writing and not. I think, going from what Lord has said at the end of his post, if he was able to, he'd nominate himself for his 'on field' writing. This nomination was in fun, you may have missed the and :lol: by the people nominating him and we are entitled to our opinions and nominations, the same as you are. I don't see the point of making negative comments about other peoples nominations, when this (the awards) are supposed to be all in fun anyway.

I'm not sure if you were trying to be facetious with your cafe district comments but do these cliches really need to be brought into the game of sevens? Assuming - once again, of course - that you were referring to our sevens team, I don't think this is necessary to start personalising these well used, over done and somewhat boreing cliches to a team because of their name. If you want to go over that tired game, visit the appropriate team forums.

Sorry I should have attached this to my post. :lol: :lol:

Now that makes it all better ;-)

Sounds like someone has had a little too many cups of cino.
But what would I know I'm just a flano wearign derro from the filthy Western Suburbs. Hey we all have labels for each other I personally think I get the short end of the stick.

All of this quoting of quotes of quote of quotes of quotes makes for a long long long long thread. ;-) :lol: :lol: :lol:

well that was a bloody useless post wasnt it.......
BTW im am aware of the irony involved in this post
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Useless? yeah, your probably right. But I have absolutely no idea where the irony is. :lol: :lol: :lol:

(Backpacker started it! Honestly, it's all his fault! :lol: :lol: :lol:

how cant you see the irony!
your an idiot
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

i think Backpacker has alot to answer for!

 

[The Backpacker]

The Backpacker takes no responsibility for the kiddies who come in here to play. But it's nice to see those from rival pre-schools playing so nicely together. ;-) A refreshing change.

Raider_69, it was your vote alright.

 

[Big Mick]

Now that I'm sure I'm not going to get tarred and feathered or create a lolly scramble of epic proportions, I'd like to nominate the good Lord Reynoldson for most controversial forummer of the year.

This is the man that had the hide to show his face at Easts leagues club after taking the favourite son Hodge's name in vain and made implications of a tarnished halo all while running out under the biblical colours of red, white and blue. And, while he can be forgiven for his Bulldog salary cap claims, he's due the penance of wearing a warning for the next year, of a blasphemiser of contraversial proportions.

Justin Hodges? Oh yeah, I remember him. That loud mouth Easts player that got a little bruise on his knee so had to sit out for the whole season. Hey, as I said in my article, he should'e been suspended for the season, that injury was just Karma. :lol: :lol: :lol:

It was also claiming that the Roosters should have lost their premiership I think. :lol: :lol: :lol: And I'm surprised that my latest Andrew Johns is all talk and definitely not the best player in the world thing didn't get a mention here. :lol: :lol: :lol:

And what do you mean by the "good Lord Reynoldson"? I've never heard of him.

Say it Lord - Hodges is my favourite player. I'm sorry he was injured by the evil sandcorp turf. Easts were rightful winners in 2002...You can do it.

Go to hell. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I assume that Dragon Fanatic was the one who plageurised their post? If it's a vote for most controversial off field forumer, I'll vote for Dragon Fanatic just ahead of ParraMatt's poaching.

If this is a vote for on-field controversy, well, I've been told I should be nominated for that. DOWN WITH JUSTIN HODGES! (Whoops, I shouldn't say that too loudly, some team-mates may hear me. :lol: :lol: :lol: But there is always rules against nominating yourself, so I have no idea who to choose if it's "on-field" controversy.

Saddly I agree with you. I feel that nothing he has done has affected the forum sevens. Just ruffled a few feathers (sorry about the pun) over at the cafe district.

And Andrew Johns is sooooo overrated. One day we will all realise.

I am assuming by your comment DvdHntr, that you are referring to Lord Reynoldson's nomination in this post?

Could you please direct me to the section where it says that the person nominated has to have 'done' something to affect the sevens. Whilst any number of people could have been nominated regarding their 'off field' behaviour, I chose to use my nomination to choose someone who was disputatious 'on field'. I am assuming you read every one of his articles this year and obviously have a different opinion to mine as to what you'd consider controversial writing and not. I think, going from what Lord has said at the end of his post, if he was able to, he'd nominate himself for his 'on field' writing. This nomination was in fun, you may have missed the and :lol: by the people nominating him and we are entitled to our opinions and nominations, the same as you are. I don't see the point of making negative comments about other peoples nominations, when this (the awards) are supposed to be all in fun anyway.

I'm not sure if you were trying to be facetious with your cafe district comments but do these cliches really need to be brought into the game of sevens? Assuming - once again, of course - that you were referring to our sevens team, I don't think this is necessary to start personalising these well used, over done and somewhat boreing cliches to a team because of their name. If you want to go over that tired game, visit the appropriate team forums.

Sorry I should have attached this to my post. :lol: :lol:

Now that makes it all better ;-)

Sounds like someone has had a little too many cups of cino.
But what would I know I'm just a flano wearign derro from the filthy Western Suburbs. Hey we all have labels for each other I personally think I get the short end of the stick.

All of this quoting of quotes of quote of quotes of quotes makes for a long long long long thread. ;-) :lol: :lol: :lol:

well that was a bloody useless post wasnt it.......
BTW im am aware of the irony involved in this post
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Useless? yeah, your probably right. But I have absolutely no idea where the irony is. :lol: :lol: :lol:

(Backpacker started it! Honestly, it's all his fault! :lol: :lol: :lol:

how cant you see the irony!
your an idiot
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

i think Backpacker has alot to answer for!

Whats with all the god damn quotes??

 

[Anonymous]

Just the kids filling up a bit of the website database. Sometimes called 'message bombing' I believe.

 

[Genghis Chan]

Now that I'm sure I'm not going to get tarred and feathered or create a lolly scramble of epic proportions, I'd like to nominate the good Lord Reynoldson for most controversial forummer of the year.

This is the man that had the hide to show his face at Easts leagues club after taking the favourite son Hodge's name in vain and made implications of a tarnished halo all while running out under the biblical colours of red, white and blue. And, while he can be forgiven for his Bulldog salary cap claims, he's due the penance of wearing a warning for the next year, of a blasphemiser of contraversial proportions.

Justin Hodges? Oh yeah, I remember him. That loud mouth Easts player that got a little bruise on his knee so had to sit out for the whole season. Hey, as I said in my article, he should'e been suspended for the season, that injury was just Karma. :lol: :lol: :lol:

It was also claiming that the Roosters should have lost their premiership I think. :lol: :lol: :lol: And I'm surprised that my latest Andrew Johns is all talk and definitely not the best player in the world thing didn't get a mention here. :lol: :lol: :lol:

And what do you mean by the "good Lord Reynoldson"? I've never heard of him.

Say it Lord - Hodges is my favourite player. I'm sorry he was injured by the evil sandcorp turf. Easts were rightful winners in 2002...You can do it.

Go to hell. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I assume that Dragon Fanatic was the one who plageurised their post? If it's a vote for most controversial off field forumer, I'll vote for Dragon Fanatic just ahead of ParraMatt's poaching.

If this is a vote for on-field controversy, well, I've been told I should be nominated for that. DOWN WITH JUSTIN HODGES! (Whoops, I shouldn't say that too loudly, some team-mates may hear me. :lol: :lol: :lol: But there is always rules against nominating yourself, so I have no idea who to choose if it's "on-field" controversy.

Saddly I agree with you. I feel that nothing he has done has affected the forum sevens. Just ruffled a few feathers (sorry about the pun) over at the cafe district.

And Andrew Johns is sooooo overrated. One day we will all realise.

I am assuming by your comment DvdHntr, that you are referring to Lord Reynoldson's nomination in this post?

Could you please direct me to the section where it says that the person nominated has to have 'done' something to affect the sevens. Whilst any number of people could have been nominated regarding their 'off field' behaviour, I chose to use my nomination to choose someone who was disputatious 'on field'. I am assuming you read every one of his articles this year and obviously have a different opinion to mine as to what you'd consider controversial writing and not. I think, going from what Lord has said at the end of his post, if he was able to, he'd nominate himself for his 'on field' writing. This nomination was in fun, you may have missed the and :lol: by the people nominating him and we are entitled to our opinions and nominations, the same as you are. I don't see the point of making negative comments about other peoples nominations, when this (the awards) are supposed to be all in fun anyway.

I'm not sure if you were trying to be facetious with your cafe district comments but do these cliches really need to be brought into the game of sevens? Assuming - once again, of course - that you were referring to our sevens team, I don't think this is necessary to start personalising these well used, over done and somewhat boreing cliches to a team because of their name. If you want to go over that tired game, visit the appropriate team forums.

Sorry I should have attached this to my post. :lol: :lol:

Now that makes it all better ;-)

Sounds like someone has had a little too many cups of cino.
But what would I know I'm just a flano wearign derro from the filthy Western Suburbs. Hey we all have labels for each other I personally think I get the short end of the stick.

All of this quoting of quotes of quote of quotes of quotes makes for a long long long long thread. ;-) :lol: :lol: :lol:

well that was a bloody useless post wasnt it.......
BTW im am aware of the irony involved in this post
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Useless? yeah, your probably right. But I have absolutely no idea where the irony is. :lol: :lol: :lol:

(Backpacker started it! Honestly, it's all his fault! :lol: :lol: :lol:

how cant you see the irony!
your an idiot
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

i think Backpacker has alot to answer for!

I'm just useless with irony. Isn't irony that thing that people go hunting elephants for? Sarcasm is my specialty. :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[Raider_69]

Now that I'm sure I'm not going to get tarred and feathered or create a lolly scramble of epic proportions, I'd like to nominate the good Lord Reynoldson for most controversial forummer of the year.

This is the man that had the hide to show his face at Easts leagues club after taking the favourite son Hodge's name in vain and made implications of a tarnished halo all while running out under the biblical colours of red, white and blue. And, while he can be forgiven for his Bulldog salary cap claims, he's due the penance of wearing a warning for the next year, of a blasphemiser of contraversial proportions.

Justin Hodges? Oh yeah, I remember him. That loud mouth Easts player that got a little bruise on his knee so had to sit out for the whole season. Hey, as I said in my article, he should'e been suspended for the season, that injury was just Karma. :lol: :lol: :lol:

It was also claiming that the Roosters should have lost their premiership I think. :lol: :lol: :lol: And I'm surprised that my latest Andrew Johns is all talk and definitely not the best player in the world thing didn't get a mention here. :lol: :lol: :lol:

And what do you mean by the "good Lord Reynoldson"? I've never heard of him.

Say it Lord - Hodges is my favourite player. I'm sorry he was injured by the evil sandcorp turf. Easts were rightful winners in 2002...You can do it.

Go to hell. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I assume that Dragon Fanatic was the one who plageurised their post? If it's a vote for most controversial off field forumer, I'll vote for Dragon Fanatic just ahead of ParraMatt's poaching.

If this is a vote for on-field controversy, well, I've been told I should be nominated for that. DOWN WITH JUSTIN HODGES! (Whoops, I shouldn't say that too loudly, some team-mates may hear me. :lol: :lol: :lol: But there is always rules against nominating yourself, so I have no idea who to choose if it's "on-field" controversy.

Saddly I agree with you. I feel that nothing he has done has affected the forum sevens. Just ruffled a few feathers (sorry about the pun) over at the cafe district.

And Andrew Johns is sooooo overrated. One day we will all realise.

I am assuming by your comment DvdHntr, that you are referring to Lord Reynoldson's nomination in this post?

Could you please direct me to the section where it says that the person nominated has to have 'done' something to affect the sevens. Whilst any number of people could have been nominated regarding their 'off field' behaviour, I chose to use my nomination to choose someone who was disputatious 'on field'. I am assuming you read every one of his articles this year and obviously have a different opinion to mine as to what you'd consider controversial writing and not. I think, going from what Lord has said at the end of his post, if he was able to, he'd nominate himself for his 'on field' writing. This nomination was in fun, you may have missed the and :lol: by the people nominating him and we are entitled to our opinions and nominations, the same as you are. I don't see the point of making negative comments about other peoples nominations, when this (the awards) are supposed to be all in fun anyway.

I'm not sure if you were trying to be facetious with your cafe district comments but do these cliches really need to be brought into the game of sevens? Assuming - once again, of course - that you were referring to our sevens team, I don't think this is necessary to start personalising these well used, over done and somewhat boreing cliches to a team because of their name. If you want to go over that tired game, visit the appropriate team forums.

Sorry I should have attached this to my post. :lol: :lol:

Now that makes it all better ;-)

Sounds like someone has had a little too many cups of cino.
But what would I know I'm just a flano wearign derro from the filthy Western Suburbs. Hey we all have labels for each other I personally think I get the short end of the stick.

All of this quoting of quotes of quote of quotes of quotes makes for a long long long long thread. ;-) :lol: :lol: :lol:

well that was a bloody useless post wasnt it.......
BTW im am aware of the irony involved in this post
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Useless? yeah, your probably right. But I have absolutely no idea where the irony is. :lol: :lol: :lol:

(Backpacker started it! Honestly, it's all his fault! :lol: :lol: :lol:

how cant you see the irony!
your an idiot
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

i think Backpacker has alot to answer for!

I'm just useless with irony. Isn't irony that thing that people go hunting elephants for? Sarcasm is my specialty. :lol: :lol: :lol:

sarcasm is good, its just not my cuppa tea
irony is the money mood

 

[Anonymous]

I think we got it the first time R69. Time to can it... the thread is getting hard to read and I've better things to do than to laugh at the same joke 20 times.

 

[The Backpacker]

Now that we're back to normality...

Nominations thus far...

Anastabation
Dragon Fanatic 4 nominations
Lord Reynoldson 3 nominations
ParraMatt 3 nominations
MattO
Red Dragon

Keep the nominations coming...

 

[Zef]

I'll go AB no doubt about it.

AB, as a fellow Dog man I love you like a brother without ever laying eyes on you and you'll alway have a beer in your hand at my BBQ, but...

What I said about shooting you I meant. WHat the hell were you calling yourself back then - number 6 or something?

Lucky that tender fell through up Berleigh - I was bringing Dave, Miss V and BrentWebbs No1 Fan with me too. We were armed.

 

[Genghis Chan]

I don't know if I have or haven't voted yet, but if I have, I suggest someone nominate Parrot AKA halfy for the most controversial forummer of the year if it's off field exploits. He always said that the Pirates would be around at the business end of the season. :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[maelgwnau]

the hacker that distroyed ish.biz so we had to start again

 

[Robster]

ParraMatt

 

[The Backpacker]

Nominations thus far...

Anastabation 2 nominations
Dragon Fanatic 4 nominations
Lord Reynoldson 3 nominations
ParraMatt 4 nominations
Red Dragon

Special mentions
MattO
The Hacker

Keep the nominations coming...

 

[ParraMatt]

Someone vote bloody Robster.

 

[Anonymous]

Robster wasnt in the competition.