Yeah I get it's an alternative - I also get that it's geniused. No need to get defensive just cause it's a stupid suggestion.
As far as whether he's a pure point or not I'm not convinced either - but neither is Westbrook or Rose and they're both in the conference finals. Ok he isn't the player that either of those guys are, but next to a Tyreke Evans (for example) he wouldn't have to be.
Not getting defensive at all.
Just trying to cover all bases...no matter how stupid, ridiculous or geniused they are.
And I agree 100% next to Tyreke he wouldn't have to be.