For the playoffs, James is averaging 36 points on 22 shots, along with 7 assists. James is doing everything he can to win basketball games. Kobe was doing everything he could for two straight years to win scoring titles, MVPs, and popularity. He gave up on his team more than once in the playoffs because he wanted to have a sook. He demanded a trade. I'm not saying Bron has been perfect, or that he won't do those things in the future, but they haven't happened yet.
#-o
You sum up my original argument so well...
Firstly, when Kobe was at the height of his so called "I'm Selfish" Era which officially brought to an end the great dynasty, how many shots was Kobe taking during the season? 26? 30? 35? Nope - 18! Less than 20 shots a game, and only just on 20 shots during the postseason, whilst averaging 5 assists per game at a time when his team-mates were lucky to even touch the rim on a layup attempt. Of course, LeBron is jacking up more shots but no one cares. Apparently if the media love you, it's "doing what's best for your team".
Secondly, Kobe may have demanded a trade, but what's the difference between Kobe demanding a trade and LeBron NOT extending his contract when Cleveland have done everything humanly possible to give him one? Seriously, what's the difference? The only real difference is that with the opt-out clause LeBron has the keys to the car, whereas Kobe needed to demand a trade because he was locked into a long term deal. But in essence, they're doing exactly the same thing. Kobe gave the Lakers a solution to a problem. LeBron is holding a whole city hostage, to the point where Knicks fans are chanting his name trying to wing him over. Kobe may have openly demanded a trade but every day LeBron holds out on extending he is privately saying "You know, I really don't know if I want to play with you guys anymore". There is no counter-argument for it. If he wanted to stay, he would've signed already. The only difference here is that the guys in the media oogle LeBron, and the only reason they oogle him is because he IS going to be one of the top three greatest players in NBA history. Kobe was never going to be that so everyone was prepared to crap all over him. The press catered to Jordan the same way. Jordan demanded that the Bulls trade Pippen, Grant and Cartwright after the Pistons debacle every year until they won the championship. But the media ALWAYS overlooked it because they knew that negavite press about Jordan meant they were never getting access to his private life again - and every reoprter wanted a slice of Jordan magic.
Again, it's the double standard LeBron gets away with and Kobe doesn't. My argument isn't that LeBron deserves the accolades (he does), it's that the accolades themselves come and go on a preferencial basis, that's all. (And it's coming from a person that doesn't even like Kobe...)
And why mention two of James' best teammates but not Kobe's at the time - Odom? Because Parker & Brown suited your argument better....?
Can we run a poll on "Which Second Best Player On A Los Angelas Playoff Team Is Likely To Sh*t His Pants As Soon As The Playoffs Begin" on this forum? We should, we must. I demand it. I mean, who would everyone here prefer to have on their team as their number two playoff guy: 2009 Mo Williams, or 2005-2009 Lamar Odom? I think you'll find the reason in that answer there.