joel caine number 1 fan said:
im happy if u think duncan is better than KG but it better be for a better reason than hes never won a championship
Unbelievable...
Alright, here goes.
Firstly, you're wrong when you say that if you swap Duncan and Garnett that Duncan doesn't go to the playoffs. The 03-04 Spurs (The first non-Robinson year of Parker, Turkoglu, Duncan, Bowen, Nesterovich) were remarkably weaker than the 04-05 Timberwolves (Cassell, Spreewell, Szczerbiak, Garnett, Olowakandi), but went all the way to the Conference Semifinals, racking up 57 regular season wins in comparison with the 04-05 T'Wolves who bombed out with 44 wins and no playoffs appearance. It's ludacris to say that if you swap Duncan with Garnett, that Garnett would have the rings and Duncan would not. Evidently, this isn't true.
I'll freely admit that Kevin Garnett is a more talented basketball player than Tim Duncan. But you know what, so is Smush Parker, Zac Randolph and Corey Brewer, just to name a very very small minority. Does that make any of them better than Tim Duncan? Of course not. We've already argued this before, but anyone who uses this as a draw string for validating KG over TD is vehemently tripping.
When I see Kevin Garnett commanding triple-teams AT THE WING (not just in the post) than I'll be prepared to even consider him in the same court spreading domain as TD. Until then, I'll always remember him as the guy who burnt Cassell and Chauncy Billups (who people easily forget played with Garnett) instead of thriving of their penetration.
And finally, to win last years unpreceedented stacked West is the silver lining when comparing TD and KG. Even if KG wins this years East, it will not compared to how bizarely good last years Western Conference was.
Tim Duncan is a better NBA player than Kevin Garnett. Basketball player, not necessarily. NBA player, head and shoulders...