It's a curious way to engage in the platform.. the anonymous nature of the forum allows the freedom to express views without any public or private backlash.. a fully open discourse of ideas and opinions to be challenged or bolstered.
Yet some would prefer to analyse the poster..criticise them and thier integrity? Given that they are anonymous... I couldn't imagine a more fruitless way to engage.
I'm sure you're capable of better content than the pointless side commentary with Caynard.
This is the most hypocritical thing ever written on the internet.