What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

New Zealand 2 will deal a massive blow to NZ rugby

Messages
900
Anyway, it's always interesting to see how our nearest competitors are doing and you have to wonder if the interest in Super Rugby is in decline throughout NZ dominace.. where will it go when they aren't..?
The NZ super rugby teams will come good when the time comes, it must be hard to get themselves up playing against sub-standard teams year-in year-out. Come finals time or in matches that really count (for whatever reason) they`ll put the Aussie teams back in their box I`ve no doubt.
I find it very hard to believe that the Oz teams have all of a sudden discovered all these good young players when it has been obvious the last few years their teams are made up of players with very average talent.
 

Gobsmacked

Bench
Messages
3,322
The NZ super rugby teams will come good when the time comes, it must be hard to get themselves up playing against sub-standard teams year-in year-out. Come finals time or in matches that really count (for whatever reason) they`ll put the Aussie teams back in their box I`ve no doubt.
I find it very hard to believe that the Oz teams have all of a sudden discovered all these good young players when it has been obvious the last few years their teams are made up of players with very average talent.
They've put 5 teams of talent into 4, while NZ put 5 into 6..
Your probably right and the season will turn around but the question remains the same, how would Super Rugby's declining interest in NZ hold up if there teams are not making finals? Does it accelerate?
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
37,120
They've put 5 teams of talent into 4, while NZ put 5 into 6..
Your probably right and the season will turn around but the question remains the same, how would Super Rugby's declining interest in NZ hold up if there teams are not making finals? Does it accelerate?
That’s a good point about the death of the rebels making the rest stronger

If they go back to 3 which isn’t far off they could actually be decent whilst nz went the other way

Not like the force will last long anyway

They struggle to have players for 11 super rugby sides whilst league is 17 going to 20
 

Gobsmacked

Bench
Messages
3,322
That’s a good point about the death of the rebels making the rest stronger

If they go back to 3 which isn’t far off they could actually be decent whilst nz went the other way

Not like the force will last long anyway

They struggle to have players for 11 super rugby sides whilst league is 17 going to 20
If you put the talent into simple figures:

Super Rugby 2022- 5m per team, 12 teams = 60m.
Super Rugby 2025- 5m pr team,11 teams = 55m.

NRL 2022 - 11m pr team , 16 teams =
176 million .
NRL 2025- 12m pr team, 17 teams =
204 million.
NRL 2028... 13m pr team, 19 teams=
247 million....

In the last 3 years The gap between player wages spent on NRL vs Super Rugby grew from 116 million to 149 million and on track to be around 193 million by 2028.

We're seeing a steady flow of talent to Rugby league , European Rugby and Japan and as the talent flows out the door, so will the fans..broadcast revenue has already taken a hit which can only affect wages negatively and the cycle continues. A play for Sualii is a desperate attempt to break the cycle which likely made it worse by overspending on the area you need to be most frugal.

Over a long enough timeline NRL becomes the only serious Rugby competition in the pacific.
I've been advocating for another NZ team for a long time to really accelerate the process of converting Kiwis into NRL fans but in reality, that's already happening. By the time they get a second team, NZ will already be Rugby league territory.

I guess the strategy from the NRL is not to go to war with Super Rugby, but to wait and let them starve. Then walk into the territory.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
37,120
If you put the talent into simple figures:

Super Rugby 2022- 5m per team, 12 teams = 60m.
Super Rugby 2025- 5m pr team,11 teams = 55m.

NRL 2022 - 11m pr team , 16 teams =
176 million .
NRL 2025- 12m pr team, 17 teams =
204 million.
NRL 2028... 13m pr team, 19 teams=
247 million....

In the last 3 years The gap between player wages spent on NRL vs Super Rugby grew from 116 million to 149 million and on track to be around 193 million by 2028.

We're seeing a steady flow of talent to Rugby league , European Rugby and Japan and as the talent flows out the door, so will the fans..broadcast revenue has already taken a hit which can only affect wages negatively and the cycle continues. A play for Sualii is a desperate attempt to break the cycle which likely made it worse by overspending on the area you need to be most frugal.

Over a long enough timeline NRL becomes the only serious Rugby competition in the pacific.
I've been advocating for another NZ team for a long time to really accelerate the process of converting Kiwis into NRL fans but in reality, that's already happening. By the time they get a second team, NZ will already be Rugby league territory.

I guess the strategy from the NRL is not to go to war with Super Rugby, but to wait and let them starve. Then walk into the territory.
Super rugby is a “development comp” according to some people on here which is why I’m not surprised kiwis like a rugby comp which actually matters in its own right
 

Latest posts

Top