What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

New Zealand 2 will deal a massive blow to NZ rugby

Vlad59

Bench
Messages
4,605
That 1m and 700k stat you keep quoting is from 2023 and comparing a match in the morning to a prime time finals match. IIRC at the time you claimed the Warriors would get better ratings. :)

I never made any predictions about the NRL deal (Te Kaha did) or the rugby deal. Furthermore, we don't have any confirmed figures for either rugby or the NRL, it's all just speculation about rugby and no idea about the NRL as there's been no indication about what any new deal will be anyway.
You do realise this bloke is certifiably insane don’t you?
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
34,999
That 1m and 700k stat you keep quoting is from 2023 and comparing a match in the morning to a prime time finals match. IIRC at the time you claimed the Warriors would get better ratings. :)

I never made any predictions about the NRL deal (Te Kaha did) or the rugby deal. Furthermore, we don't have any confirmed figures for either rugby or the NRL, it's all just speculation about rugby and no idea about the NRL as there's been no indication about what any new deal will be anyway.
Yeh I did say the warriors would win that ratings battle

Just shows when they are doing well 100k becomes 700k plus

The problem is an underperforming warriors side is used as a benchmark for rugby league in nz

Second nz side could be like the crusaders (same city, maybe something In the water?)

They would rate their tits off

Or if the warriors start accessing the kiwi talent pool properly and getting the best nz players

Jfh is a great signing he should be captain


 

Matiunz

Juniors
Messages
905
Yeh I did say the warriors would win that ratings battle

Just shows when they are doing well 100k becomes 700k plus

The problem is an underperforming warriors side is used as a benchmark for rugby league in nz

Second nz side could be like the crusaders (same city, maybe something In the water?)

They would rate their tits off

Or if the warriors start accessing the kiwi talent pool properly and getting the best nz players

Jfh is a great signing he should be captain


Will be interesting to see how much interest NZ2 gains outside of the SI(danger of targeting the team to 20% of the population) Crusaders example- despite their success are universally hated outside of Canterbury, NRL example would be Storm
Captaincy seems to be a 2 horse race between JFH and Barnett, I’d suspect Webby will lean towards Barnett to take some pressure off JFH already with high expectations
 

flippikat

First Grade
Messages
5,297
Will be interesting to see how much interest NZ2 gains outside of the SI(danger of targeting the team to 20% of the population) Crusaders example- despite their success are universally hated outside of Canterbury, NRL example would be Storm
The Orca bid has me conflicted - the idea that they'd "cover" Wellington as a secondary market for a game (or games) each season offers a mouth-watering prospect for us game-starved fans here in the capital - and it DOES help broaden the prospective supporter base for that 2nd NZ team beyond just the 20% of NZ's population in the South Island.....

HOWEVER there's that nagging thought in my head that it might preclude the NRL from considering a 3rd NZ team for a long time - if ever - if the 3 biggest NZ cities can be "covered" by two teams.

Maybe it'd strategically be better for NZ in the long run if NZ 2 was a South Island focused team (Mostly Christchurch, some games in Dunedin.. maybe a trial in Nelson or on the West Coast), and the Warriors moving their one "Home away from home" game back to being in Wellington once NZ 2 debuts, until such time as NZ 3 happens (based in Wellington).

At that stage, the question would become "How do the Auckland & Wellington based teams divide the North Island?"
 

Matiunz

Juniors
Messages
905
The Orca bid has me conflicted - the idea that they'd "cover" Wellington as a secondary market for a game (or games) each season offers a mouth-watering prospect for us game-starved fans here in the capital - and it DOES help broaden the prospective supporter base for that 2nd NZ team beyond just the 20% of NZ's population in the South Island.....

HOWEVER there's that nagging thought in my head that it might preclude the NRL from considering a 3rd NZ team for a long time - if ever - if the 3 biggest NZ cities can be "covered" by two teams.

Maybe it'd strategically be better for NZ in the long run if NZ 2 was a South Island focused team (Mostly Christchurch, some games in Dunedin.. maybe a trial in Nelson or on the West Coast), and the Warriors moving their one "Home away from home" game back to being in Wellington once NZ 2 debuts, until such time as NZ 3 happens (based in Wellington).

At that stage, the question would become "How do the Auckland & Wellington based teams divide the North Island?"
Yeah I hear you but also the 35+ years it will be between NZ 1 and NZ2 means it’d be unlikely I’d have too much time to enjoy NZ3 anyways lol
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
34,999
Yeah I hear you but also the 35+ years it will be between NZ 1 and NZ2 means it’d be unlikely I’d have too much time to enjoy NZ3 anyways lol

Might be as little as ten years

Depending on how successful Christchurch are (warriors too in terms of crowds etc)

And also how much money the nrl generate in future tv deals esp nz

The biggest issue to more teams is need more players so png and nz need time to grow

Plus lack of good coaches
 

flippikat

First Grade
Messages
5,297
Might be as little as ten years

Depending on how successful Christchurch are (warriors too in terms of crowds etc)

And also how much money the nrl generate in future tv deals esp nz

The biggest issue to more teams is need more players so png and nz need time to grow

Plus lack of good coaches
Yip, that's the rub - if NZ 2 is a success & shows-up the Warriors, then that would indicate to the NRL that it's NOT a given that NZ clubs will underperform by default (because "NZ doesn't have a winning RL culture" right?)

Which opens the door for a 3rd NZ club.

So, uhh.. no pressure Christchurch ;)
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,755
I'd suggest New Zealand's issue is one of demographic and population, not on- field success.

NZ2 is years away, NZ3 is a "not in our lifetime" timetable.

Despite all the bluster, the NRL has expanded by a grand total of 1 since 2007, and even that was totally subsidised by the taxpayer.
 

SirPies&Beers

Juniors
Messages
637
I'd suggest New Zealand's issue is one of demographic and population, not on- field success.

NZ2 is years away, NZ3 is a "not in our lifetime" timetable.

Despite all the bluster, the NRL has expanded by a grand total of 1 since 2007, and even that was totally subsidised by the taxpayer.
two
dolphins and papua
 

Matua

First Grade
Messages
5,221
You do realise this bloke is certifiably insane don’t you?
I come back to this thread for a few days of shitfighting with him and his bestie Gob, Gobs multis, and their little reach around club. But I don't take it that seriously.
 

flippikat

First Grade
Messages
5,297
I'd suggest New Zealand's issue is one of demographic and population, not on- field success.

NZ2 is years away, NZ3 is a "not in our lifetime" timetable.

Despite all the bluster, the NRL has expanded by a grand total of 1 since 2007, and even that was totally subsidised by the taxpayer.
I wouldn't be so fast to dismiss the chances of NZ 3.

All it takes is a change of administration to one that wants to more aggressively attack rugby union in it's stronghold.

We've already seen a sea-change from the Gallop years of umm-ing and ahh-ing to a "make things happen" setup now, who knows what the leadership might be thinking in 15-20 years time from now.
 

AlwaysGreen

Post Whore
Messages
50,965
New Zealand 4 is what we should be discussing. Rugby union has been crushed and New Zealand's population are all dedicated servants of Rugby league.

The disbanding of the NZ government with V'landys put in as Glorious Leader and President for Life will be finalised by March.
 

SirPies&Beers

Juniors
Messages
637
New Zealand 4 is what we should be discussing. Rugby union has been crushed and New Zealand's population are all dedicated servants of Rugby league.

The disbanding of the NZ government with V'landys put in as Glorious Leader and President for Life will be finalised by March.
shut up alwaysloser youre not funny dummy
 

Matua

First Grade
Messages
5,221
New Zealand 4 is what we should be discussing. Rugby union has been crushed and New Zealand's population are all dedicated servants of Rugby league.

The disbanding of the NZ government with V'landys put in as Glorious Leader and President for Life will be finalised by March.
TBF, this wouldn't be so bad, he can't be any worse than the little far right dictator from a minor coalition party we have running the country now.

As long as he bases one of the league teams in my home province then I'm fully onboard.
 

Latest posts

Top