In all likelihood Fox and Seven have paid around an avg of $500-520mill cash for AFL for 7 years. That's the bar we are aiming to beat. About a 30% increase on NRL's current deal.“The AFL, for instance, is being paid $4.5 billion over seven years by Foxtel and Seven”
lol so wrong
In all likelihood Fox and Seven have paid around an avg of $500-520mill cash for AFL for 7 years. That's the bar we are aiming to beat. About a 30% increase on NRL's current deal.
Be interesting to see if NRL go for a longer deal as well or stick with the traditional 5 year deal.
I think this has more to do with the world cup, besides they'll spend it all on league players.... Sweep Sweep.
25 percent less super rugby content yet a 33 percent increase in the value
Stan really are desperate aren’t they
Somebody elsewhere said the increase may be due to the union wc and lions tour being included in the deal, hard to bloody understand otherwise.I think the market for sports is heating up with the entry of Dazn
Union got 30 percent for less content
If we don’t get north of 600 million with our extra content and strong ratings then Pvl hasn’t hit his mark
I think this has more to with the world cup, besides they'll spend it all on league players.... Sweep Sweep.
Stan had exclusive rights to extend till dec 31 which they showed no interest inSomebody elsewhere said the increase may be due to the union wc and lions tour being included in the deal, hard to bloody understand otherwise.
The murdoch owned The Oz runs a lot of union stories still despite union not being on Foxtel anymore, leads sports story was even a union story the other day, wonder if murdoch`s tabloids are the same. Don`t ever see the telegraph so don`t know. Could be that The Oz`s demographic demand it.
That price increase would be explained had Foxtel had put a bid in, but funny we`ve heard no whispers, and would Foxtel bid for union without DAZN`s approval now, hard to imagine. Being a kind of global sport you`d think union might be DAZN`s thing.
And the Lions` tour ? if both of those are included it really is not that a big of increase.Correct home World Cup is the reason
Lots of union fans creaming their pants in the comments section, this bloke pouring cold water on the deal, btw, another comment says the $8m a year that Oz union gets from the Kiwi`s will probably be slashed, so all of a sudden the $4m/yr real increase not looking so flash.
Not me but he’s rightLots of union fans creaming their pants in the comments section, this bloke pouring cold water on the deal, btw, another comment says the $8m a year that Oz union gets from the Kiwi`s will probably be slashed, so all of a sudden the $4m/yr real increase not looking so flash.
They`re probably just stoked it didn`t really go backwards like they were expecting.
Sports Finance Guy
Roar Rookie
February 3rd 2025 @ 2:33pm
"Before anyone gets too excited about the revenue uplift, it’s important to look at the deal in real, not nominal terms. Using the Australian government’s Consumer Price Index, the new $210 million deal is the equivalent to only $163.3 million in 2015 dollars or only 57% of the $285 million RA received in back in 2015. Any business whose main revenue source declines by that much over the past ten years is in big trouble.
Also the much poo-pooed expiring $150 million media deal Hamish negotiated works out to $139.9 million in 2015 dollars, so the uplift from the new deal on that is $23.4 million in real terms, or only $4.6 million per year over the next five years. Not much help to dig out of RA’s financial hole, especially with player wages skyrocketing.
Now hitting the incentives would make things better, but until we know where the thresholds are set, the odds of the RA receiving that additional $40 million could be quite slim.
Hate to pour cold water on the parade, but until the RA boosts the Wallabies and Super Rugby’s popularity by drawing bigger crowds to the matches and more eyeballs to television screens, it still remains in a very precarious financial position."
Another comment:
Jetka
Roar Rookie
February 3rd 2025 @ 2:54pm
"Will be a lot of chuckling at NRL HQ over this. People who think this will turn rugby around in this country are delusional." Is that you @Wb1234 .
Red you were arguing to you were red in the face that their deal was going to be $160m/yr or whatever bigger than ours, now your saying it`s maybe less than $100m/yr, and that`s before our next deal. What gives, that`s an almighty turn-around.In all likelihood Fox and Seven have paid around an avg of $500-520mill cash for AFL for 7 years. That's the bar we are aiming to beat. About a 30% increase on NRL's current deal.
Be interesting to see if NRL go for a longer deal as well or stick with the traditional 5 year deal.
Perth getting an nrl team lolRed you were arguing to you were red in the face that their deal was going to be $160m/yr or whatever bigger than ours, now your saying it`s maybe less than $100m/yr, and that`s before our next deal. What gives, that`s an almighty turn-around.