Perth Red
Post Whore
- Messages
- 70,499
Its like hes claiming Vlad signed a sht deal so AFL could get more money lol.Isn't wbpeanut's hero vlad responsible for the nrl deal?
Its like hes claiming Vlad signed a sht deal so AFL could get more money lol.Isn't wbpeanut's hero vlad responsible for the nrl deal?
And if Foxtel lose NRL rights, combined with speculation that Ch7 may not be able to afford their side of the deal, maybe this:So if there is a bidding war for the NRL rights and Foxtel pay significant overs, will AFL fans be allowed to complain that their subscription cost went up because Dazn overpaid for the NRL rights, or are NRL fans only allowed to complain?
I’m saying ever since Foxsports got afl they have always paid overs because they have never paid nrl what it’s worthThe NRl deal was signed before the AFL one lol
Or are you claiming Vlandys signed an unders deal so AFL could get more money when they went to the table later?
Sorry, I didn't realise this was a troll account.Think big picture mate, I expect that`s what V`landys is doing. We`re going to have a competition with an arc from Western Australia to NZ, with massive expansion into the geopolitically crucial Pacific. Remember Wong was invited to the inauguration, French President and English PM weren`t, Rubio`s first meeting was with Wong the day after, the Yanks are focussed big-time of what`s happening down here. They are watching very closely our sports diplomacy, this could open a lot of doors if it shows signs of promise.
Lots of doors could mean lots more funding to expand the game into the Pacific.
Since Foxsports has never paid overs for the nrl then sure they can whine if it happensSo if there is a bidding war for the NRL rights and Foxtel pay significant overs, will AFL fans be allowed to complain that their subscription cost went up because Dazn overpaid for the NRL rights, or are NRL fans only allowed to complain?
He's not the sharpest tool in the shed.
Is that on Fox or on the people at NRLHQ? Fox pay what they feel they have to. why over 25 years that continues to be less than they end up paying for AFL is an interesting question to ponder on.I’m saying ever since Foxsports got afl they have always paid overs because they have never paid nrl what it’s worth
Stan is a nightmare for them
Seeing Foxsports lose 2 billion in value if they lose the nrl is going to be sweet
And if they do lose it Stan will dominate the pay tv space
The future of the Australian pay tv market could be decided by who gets the next nrl contract
AFL broadcast deal: record $2.5 billion agreement between News Corp, Seven and Telstra
Just a week after being blindsided by the NRL's broadcast agreement with Channel Nine, Rupert Murdoch – the man who started the Super League war to gain control of the code – hit back by telling a press conference to announce News Corp's deal with AFL: "We have always preferred Aussie rules".www.smh.com.au
Rupert Murdoch … we have always preferred afl
Is that on Fox or on the people at NRLHQ? Fox pay what they feel they have to. why over 25 years that continues to be less than they end up paying for AFL is an interesting question to ponder on.
Stan will be a nightmare for fans if Ch9 is anything to go by! We could lose droves of casual viewers who wont put up with the ineptness of Ch9 coverage.
It’s like news Ltd owning half the game for 20 years totally slipped you byIs that on Fox or on the people at NRLHQ? Fox pay what they feel they have to. why over 25 years that continues to be less than they end up paying for AFL is an interesting question to ponder on.
Stan will be a nightmare for fans if Ch9 is anything to go by! We could lose droves of casual viewers who wont put up with the ineptness of Ch9 coverage.
That $1.7bn figure can’t be real or at least there’s more to it. $340m/yr vs $643m/yr?!?!
Borrowed from the Midgets' crowd counters.He used the same calculator he used to count Bears members lol
Its like the fact News ltd hasnt owned half the game in the last three tv deals has slipped you by.It’s like news Ltd owning half the game for 20 years totally slipped you by
Your mate Dave smith ruined the second deal so much Murdoch got him sacked and went on tv saying they have always preferred afl and gave afl an extra 100 million just to spite rugby leagueIts like the fact News ltd hasnt owned half the game in the last three tv deals has slipped you by.
As will be proven in a few weeks time the NRL and the AFL for the year 2024 (last year) the money coming from FTA and Pay Tv ARE THE SAME for the NRL and AFL. Proven! So I don't see why we have to bow to the AFL, especially NOW. It was the same with the latest figures available now. So again the latest figures available ie 2023 had the same result. Lets see what we put together in a few months time. Always possible ( see previous scenarios) we could put a better package together to start in 2026 with carrots and sticks approach to get a new ( semi) deal ending up with 2028 being a blow out deal that puts the NRL at the TOP of the heap! ( in TV, PayTV terms only)Your mate Dave smith ruined the second deal so much Murdoch got him sacked and went on tv saying they have always preferred afl and gave afl an extra 100 million just to spite rugby league
Pvl panicked over covid so his first deal wasn’t reflective of market
His next deal will be
Yeh the dopes don’t realise that before the extensions both deals were essentially for the same moneyAs will be proven in a few weeks time the NRL and the AFL for the year 2024 (last year) the money coming from FTA and Pay Tv ARE THE SAME for the NRL and AFL. Proven! So I don't see why we have to bow to the AFL, especially NOW. It was the same with the latest figures available now. So again the latest figures available ie 2023 had the same result. Lets see what we put together in a few months time. Always possible ( see previous scenarios) we could put a better package together to start in 2026 with carrots and sticks approach to get a new ( semi) deal ending up with 2028 being a blow out deal that puts the NRL at the TOP of the heap! ( in TV, PayTV terms only)