What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Next TV rights deal

Status
Not open for further replies.

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/bus...ights-deals-loom/story-fnab9kqj-1227358241584

Seven in a jam as NRL, AFL TV rights deals loom

The Australian
May 18, 2015 12:00AM

The National Rugby League is inclined to move at least one game from Fox Sports to be broadcast live on free-to-air television.

While maintaining it has a blank-sheet approach, the NRL has identified some clear objectives ahead of its meetings with broadcasters over the coming weeks: it wants more live games and better free-to-air coverage.

This could work nicely for Nine, which is trying to take an NRL game from Fox for Saturday nights, because it currently doesn’t have any free-to-air games on Saturdays.

Given the NRL wants more live games, it’s also possible that one of the two Friday night games could move to Thursday.

With the first round of briefings with broadcasters starting this week, the NRL last Tuesday announced a formal adviser to handle its rights process, Credit Suisse chief executive John Knox, who was also adviser to Cricket Australia in its rights bid. Knox has previously worked with veteran Graeme Samuel, who ran the process for the NRL as an independent adviser.

But Credit Suisse has recently lost managing director Emma Jane Newton, who was appointed head of corporate development at Telstra in July. “EJ”, as she’s known in the industry, was heavily involved in Nine’s refinancing. Interestingly, she is the daughter of The Australian’s founding editor Max Newton.

Seven’s longstanding lawyers Clayton Utz have accepted the brief from the NRL to act in its forthcoming rights tender — and this has caused some disquiet at Pyrmont. It means that Seven’s sports legal work will come up for tender. It’ll be a lucrative contract, keenly sought-after among law firms.

As a long line of execs from Seven, Nine, Ten and Foxtel traipse through NRL headquarters over coming weeks, one who will have a long commute is Jeffrey Browne, who Diary revealed last week is running Nine’s negotiations. He’s basing himself in the south of France for Australia’s winter. Only Browne could run a rights negotiation while sunbaking and sipping malbec in Aix-en-Provence.

If the NRL signs a five-year deal, it will mean the rights are locked in for 7½ years from now. If it’s a seven-year deal, it will take the rights out of action for a decade.

Meanwhile, the fact the NRL opened their bidding process 2½ years early caught the AFL napping. The NRL seems to be determined to no longer play a poor cousin to the AFL.

By jumping ahead of the AFL, all FTA broadcasters are serious bidders on the NRL for the first time, including Seven. How could the network be prepared not to bid when it doesn’t have a guarantee on retaining the AFL rights?

The AFL now will have to decide whether it waits or runs its bidding process simultaneously.

But networks are already planning their AFL strategy. Diary understands Foxtel is keen to take a game off FTA. Ben Buckley is running its bid. If it goes ahead, the collective rights, including digital, could *potentially see valuations of $4.5 billion of deals done in the next few months.
 

Johnny88

Juniors
Messages
1,337
A Saturday night free to air nrl game would be good for those that don't have foxtel. Don't know if Thursday night footy would work every round.
 
Messages
4,980
Hopefully the NrL can negotiate the end of Friday Night Bronco Footy. All teams should be getting a decent share of FtA coverage. Would be happy if the networks insist on a Queensland team playing, but share it with the Cows and tits.
 

Cletus

First Grade
Messages
7,171
4 games on FTA would be perfect. Although I think it's probably a negotiating tactic to get Fox to pay more, they are far better off with 5/3 Pay/FTA split because it makes it harder to follow your team without Fox.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
not that i'd believe Johns http://www.triplem.com.au/sydney/sh...l-tv-rights-ricky-stuart-john-singleton-more/

The NRL's television rights are up for review at the end of next year and it looks like one of the tv networks has already put in a significant offer that's about half a billion more than what they got last time.

Supposedly the offer has been knocked back meaning that ANY of the networks potentially has a chance to take the NRL television rights as of the 2017 season.

"$1.5 [billion] has been offered I believe and they've knocked it back. The NRL are under the belief that they'll get closer to $2 billion, it's quite unbelievable," said Matty.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
70,033
Expansion gives you the desired extra FTA game without devaluing Fox's offerings. Will be interesting to see if Fox go for every game live deal like they did in AFL last time. With 4 FTA games I can see plenty of Foxsports subscribers cancelling unless something better than now is offered by them.
 

Starkers

Bench
Messages
3,160
Anyone else thinking they should do a four-year term, a year in advance, just to line up the next rights deal with the AFL?
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
i'm hoping for a 7 year deal where 9 throws the house at the NRL rights and extends it for 5 years and does a deal with Fox for the next two years where 9 show 4 games live and Fox simulcast a majority if not all
 

Starkers

Bench
Messages
3,160
i'm hoping for a 7 year deal where 9 throws the house at the NRL rights and extends it for 5 years and does a deal with Fox for the next two years where 9 show 4 games live and Fox simulcast a majority if not all

Yeah might work better. Screws AFL in this negotiation and the next so the NRL maximises revenue. Ch7 then underpays for AFL twice.
 

applesauce

Bench
Messages
3,573
i'm hoping for a 7 year deal where 9 throws the house at the NRL rights and extends it for 5 years and does a deal with Fox for the next two years where 9 show 4 games live and Fox simulcast a majority if not all

You're a dickhead. That is what you were railing against me for suggesting.
 

applesauce

Bench
Messages
3,573
no it wasn't

i was saying you're an idiot for thinking a 7 year deal should be worth less than a 5 year deal

It would cost the NRL something to have to renegotiate terms of the last 2 years of current deal that the TV stations want to keep (i.e. no simulcasting).
 

applesauce

Bench
Messages
3,573
you really are thick believing a 7 year deal would be worth less than a 5 year deal

I never said they would be. You are confused about 7 vs 5 year. The only price difference I mentioned was the 5 year component of both examples.

Scenario 1:
NRL get $1.5 billion for 5 years (2017) + $200 million for the remaining 2 years of the current contract but with simulcasting etc. renegotiated from next year = $1.7 billion.

Scenario 2:
NRL get $2 billion for 5 years (2017) + $200 million for the remaining 2 years of the current contract (no broadcasting terms renegotiated) = $2.2 billion.
 

Starkers

Bench
Messages
3,160
f**k it would be priceless watching Ten gazzump Nine and hear them squeel, as long as Ten doesn't go broke LOL.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top