What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Next TV rights deal

Status
Not open for further replies.

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
Expect Ten to become a hardcore right ring propaganda outlet with ringmasters such as Andrew Bolt featuring prominently.

Analysts see this as the only strategy for the network to make money, alongside live sport like Rugby League.

Having such overt political influence in a broadcast partner is not a wise move for a game that looks to appeal to all sectors of the community.

as opposed to being a left wing propaganda outlet like they are atm
 

Desert Qlder

First Grade
Messages
9,594
ten needs fox-style right wing 'revolution', says former investor laurence freedman

network ten must completely transform itself, possibly into a right wing news channel like fox, says a former investor in the struggling free-to-air broadcaster.

Pioneering funds manager laurence freedman, who made a fortune after steering ten out of receivership in the 1990s then selling his holding in the mid 2000s, said the network as few options left to return to profitability.
But mr freedman said a partnership with fairfax would not solve ten's woes.

"it's the decrepit talking to the destitute," he said.

Such a merger would hinge on fairfax selling its profitable radio stations so it didn't breach media ownership laws. Mr freedman said these laws, which prevent a media company owning a newspaper, television network and radio station in the one market, were outdated and irrelevant.

"new technology a long time ago has made a nonsense for the reason for those laws.

"every person on the planet is a journalist or an opinion maker or taker and there are no boundaries. To have artificial boundaries makes no sense and also is making life more difficult for media businesses that are caught like ten and fairfax.

"for fairfax to sell [its radio stations] in order to buy a semi defunct, old technology company, without a direction or audience, doesn't gel with me."

a fairfax media spokesman confirmed the company's management met with ten recently, but said it didn't mean it would lob a takeover offer.
"we wouldn't be doing our job if we didn't talk extensively across the industry so we fully understand the opportunities and challenges," the spokesman said.

Ten has stressed that it is undergoing a multi-year turnaround, focusing on event and reality television, sports rights and winning back media buyers through the success of shows like family feud and the bachelor.

Mr freedman helped deliver ten riches in the 1990s by focusing the network almost exclusively on targeting the 16 to 39 year old age group.

But he sold out of the company in 2004 after he bought his third phone in a year and found that it had internet connectivity.

"that was a very big warning bell for me that the medium was changing, there was newer technology and therefore i was very cautious.

"if the audience migrated were going to have a huge problem because who were we going to advertise to. We had the biggest budget of people like levis, just jeans, coke, pepsi and all those sorts of things and very little of david jones because of our audience."

people called mr freedman mad for selling his stock but his fears were eventually realised.

He said ten was unlikely win back its audience, which has permanently shifted to online platforms or to rival networks, even if it delivered the best television programs at attractive timeslots.

"the way you advertise television is not by putting ads in the newspaper, you put it on your own network. You can't put it on anybody else's network.

"but if you put it on your own network and there is nobody watching your own network, then you don't get the viewers going to the new program. It's a very vicious cycle. How you get out of it? You have to transform yourself."

mr freedman said a free-to-air television licence was still valuable and suggested the network becoming a "hard right wing news channel, a la fox" could solve its problems.

But he said there were a lot of hurdles to achieving that goal. Indeed, australian competition and consumer commission chairman rod sims said he would have difficulty approving a foxtel/ten merger.

"we would have concerns if foxtel sought to own a free-to-air station because that could substantially lessen competition in the viewing market," mr sims said.

And mr freedman conceded that news corp, which owns jointly owns foxtel with telstra, would face the same problem as fairfax because its non-executive co-chairman lachlan murdoch owns the nova entertainment radio network.

"there are lot of things in its way but my point really is that to turn around is not about trying different programs or different timeslots for the programs it's got. It needs to be revolutionary, not evolutionary."

"the management [at ten] is ok. But they can't do anything with it.
"it's like you've got a very good old car but it hasn't got a synchromesh gearbox, it has got narrow tyres, it's got a top speed of 70 kilometres an hour, and its competing with everyone who has got hybrids, and cars that can go 0-100 kmh in three seconds etc, etc… that's what the problem is."



read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/medi...e-freedman-20141021-1198gy.html#ixzz3juqudsza
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/med...128261182?nk=2adb66d868f852bcd00093ebd9da0027

Nine rules out regional TV merger

The Australian
November 19, 2014 1:09PM

NINE Entertainment Co. boss David Gyngell has dropped his longstanding interest in merging with a regional TV network, arguing he will soon be able to reach regional audiences with programming via the internet.

The chief executive of Nine also dismissed rumours linking the company to a merger involving Fairfax Media, but opened the door to the publisher buying a stake in his company.

Speaking at Nine’s inaugural AGM following last year’s float on the ASX, Mr Gyngell told The Australian he was not interested in merging with companies owning print media. “I haven’t thought about it because I think they are a long way from moving out of print,” he said.

“They talk about it but their regional newspapers still contribute a hell of a lot of profit to their business.”

Nine has partnered with Fairfax on a subscription video-on-demand joint venture, StreamCo, which will compete with US streaming giant Netflix for customers. Netflix today announced it will officially launch in March, with the press release sent as Nine’s AGM got underway.

“I think people are reading too much into that: there is this whole world of Fairfax and Nine (speculation) going on,” Gyngell said. “I don’t see any value at this point of doing any more than (StreamCo).

“If they want to buy our shares at a nice price then with my little bit I will vote for it if it’s the right price. I don’t know if they could afford to do that at this stage.”

After aborted confidential talks with regional television and radio company Southern Cross Austereo about a $4 billion merger, Nine lobbied hard to get media ownership and concentration laws removed to enable Australia’s second-placed free-to-air network to undertake a merger with a regional TV network.

But Gyngell said the moment has passed as the National Broadband Network opens up new avenues between media companies and regional audiences previously unaccessible to metropolitan TV networks.

“I’m not interested in the 75 per cent rule anymore,” he said. “I think technology is going to overtake that. They are all missing the boat. They’re all playing politics on this. In five years’ time we will just go around regional television and stream our content into those markets.

“I think free-to-air regional television is in a hugely challenged way,” he said.

“I think it’s going to be disappointing for regional viewers. They will get no local news, nothing, because people are playing politics and games on something that is going to destroy value for viewers.”

After buying Nine’s affiliate television stations in Perth and Adelaide from Bermuda-based billionaire Bruce Gordon, Mr Gyngell said that despite having a first-look option to buy more regional stations from Gordon’s WIN Corp, he will not exercise it.

“I’m sure Bruce thinks his business is more valuable than I think it is worth, but I am not interested in buying it so it doesn’t matter anymore,” he said.

Mr Gyngell reserved judgment on whether he would attempt to oppose pay TV operator Foxtel buying a stake in his free-to-air competitor Ten, but said Nine and Seven should be allowed the same opportunity.

“I think Nine and Seven should have the opportunity to do the same thing as Foxtel,” he said. “I wouldn’t want to buy Channel 10, but I think if Foxtel is allowed to buy it ... all rules should be removed bar anti-siphoning.”

He said there was a compelling logic driving interest from Foxtel and its potential bid partner US cable operator Discovery Communications in Ten as part of a global trend that has seen pay-TV companies consolidate with free-to-air networks.

“I can see value creation for Foxtel or an international company because you’re playing inside the $600 million dollar cost base,” he said.

“You’re not trying necessarily to make profits. You may well say, ‘Okay I will provide my content and instead of someone else getting $100m out of it, we’re going to get $100m out of it’.

“I see the same reason we would be interested in buying Southern Cross’s regional television business because we could put our content down those pipes and generate profits.

“Discovery will put their content down those pipes. Foxtel will do joint deals which they are already doing, which is smart.”

Mr Gyngell said Nine’s interest in buying radio and outdoor advertising assets had failed to progress due to high price valuations.

He warned the Australian Football League he would not be a ghost bidder in the code’s imminent media rights negotiations just to add competitive tension to the negotiations with incumbents Seven Network and Foxtel.

“I’m not there to help them jam the price on Foxtel and Channel 7,” he said. “It’s very difficult at these sports prices to think you can own rugby league, cricket and AFL, or (that) anyone else is going to do that.

“We will be astute. We’re a rugby league company. We love the rugby league … we will look at the AFL but if they think we’re going to be sitting there and bidding up Seven and Foxtel we’re not going to play that game.”

Commenting on speculation the AFL is pursuing a 20 per cent-plus rise in the price of the rights, he said: “It’s a joke. They’re not going to get it … that sounds like an extraordinarily high price.”

http://www.theage.com.au/business/m...ng-will-kill-regional-tv-20141119-11ppgo.html

Nine warns streaming will kill regional TV

Date
November 19, 2014 - 2:35PM

Nine Entertainment boss David Gyngell has put regional TV stations on notice, saying their big-city counterparts won't be needing them within five years.

Nine will over-ride its regional affiliate WIN Corp when their affiliation deal runs out and simply stream programmes to the regions via the internet, he flagged.

Speaking after the broadcaster's annual meeting Mr Gyngell also blasted the mooted $1.5 billion to $2 billion price tag for the next round of AFL sport rights as "a complete joke".

Mr Gyngell said he was longer lobbying for repeal of the 75 per cent reach rule that prevents metropolitan broadcasters from taking over the regional affiliates, saying the rule would become redundant as viewers watch more television over the internet.

"Everyone watches streamed content these days. If you can watch it from America, trust me you can watch it from Wogga," said Mr Gyngell.

He said the industry had "played politics" with the issue, an apparent reference to rival Seven West Media, which has not thrown its support behind the removal of the rule, contributing to the government's decision to postpone media reform.

"In five years' time we will just go around regional television and stream our content into those markets. We ultimately won't have a regional affiliate deal," said Mr Gyngell.

He conceded the move could mean the end of local news in regional centres.

"I think regional television is in a hugely challenged way. I think it's going to be disappointing for regional viewers. They'll get no local news. They'll get nothing because people are playing politics and games," he said.

The Abbott government has indicated it wants to overhaul current laws but says it is waiting for an industry consensus to emerge on possible changes.

Nine is moving into online streaming through a joint venture with Fairfax Media called Stan, which is due to launch in 2015.

The venture will face tough competition in the form of US streaming giant Netflix, which on Wednesday announced it would launch its Australian service in March next year.

But Mr Gyngell said there was room for more than one operator in the market and expects three to four million Australians to be using streaming services within five years.

"There's room for three players, (but) you'd probably have to be one of the top two to have a real profit," he said. "The category is going to explode in this country."

Commenting on the upcoming negotiations to broadcast AFL matches, Mr Gyngell said the AFL was "dreaming" if it thought it could get a price tag of $1.5 billion to $2 billion for the next round of rights, which are available from 2017.

"I think it's a joke, a complete joke," he told Fairfax Media. "They are dreaming, they are not going to get it. Our competitors can do what they like, sports have gone up all around the world but it sounds like an extraordinarily high price

"People keep forgetting there is an anti-siphoning list in Australia to ensure that Australians get access to free content and if the television advertising market has grown by 1 per cent over five years how can people say 25 per cent more for sports rights? I would be saying the same the thing about NRL as well."

Nine has a five-year deal with the NRL whereas Seven is in the middle of a $1.25 billion five-year-deal with the AFL

Meanwhile, Nine chief operating officer Simon Kelly said a pick-up in advertising would help the broadcaster lift its profit.

Mr Kelly said Nine expected to lift its first half net profit to between $85 million and $90 million, excluding a one-off profit of about $5 million on the sale of its HWW business.

Nine's first half profit in the prior year was $31.68 million.

with AAP
 

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,587
20%

http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliam.../Publications_Archive/archive/mediaregulation

but a review of the rules has been spoken about this year....
"15% rule"
Definition of Control

The focus of cross-media ownership limits under the Act is on control. Section 6 of Schedule 1 of the Act provides a simple '15 per cent' rule for establishing whether a person has control of a company. If a person has company interests (for example voting, shareholding, or dividend interests) in a company exceeding 15 per cent, then in the absence of proof to the contrary the person is deemed to be in a position to exercise control of the company.

http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliam...Publications_Archive/archive/mediaregulation#

Any bid involving Foxtel ? which is owned by media giant News Corporation and Australia?s dominant telecommunications company,Telstra ? would be commercially and politically *sensitive. However, Foxtel should avoid laws aimed at limiting concentration of ownership if it keeps its stake below the 15 per cent mark.
Foxtel would be allowed to increase its stake above 14.9 per cent in the future as part of its agreement with Discovery, providing media laws were relaxed, the sources added.

http://www.afr.com/p/business/compa...ten_network_investment_bWVnIaQ02T9l9nyR5q72UP
 

DC_fan

Coach
Messages
11,980
I cannot find an electronic version of this story, but in the Telegraph (paper copy) this morning the business section is saying that David Gyngell of C.9 is saying no to the AFLs offer of $2m for the next TV offer due in 2016.

If you want to read you will have to buy the paper.
 

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,587
I cannot find an electronic version of this story, but in the Telegraph (paper copy) this morning the business section is saying that David Gyngell of C.9 is saying no to the AFLs offer of $2m for the next TV offer due in 2016.

If you want to read you will have to buy the paper.
Nine boss dismisses $1.5bn price tag for AFL broadcast rights as a ?joke?

NINE Entertainment chief executive David Gyngell has dismissed as a ?joke? the mooted $1.6 to $2 billion price tag for the AFL?s broadcast rights from 2017 to 2021.
?If the television ad market has grown by one per cent over five years, how could someone pay 25 per cent more for (what they are paying now),?? said Mr Gyngell yesterday, referring to the $1.258 billion paid for the current five-year deal which expires at the end of 2016.
?It?s a joke. It?s a dream . They?re not going to get it,?? said the Nine chief about what is expected to be the richest ever sports broadcasting deal in Australian history.
?Channel 9 won?t be paying that valuation for that sort of thing. Our competitors can do what they like if they think they want to justify that payment. Maybe sport has gone up a lot but it sounds like an extraordinarily high price,?? he said

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/bu...rights-as-a-joke/story-fnkltfm0-1227128448424
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
Mr Gyngell said the AFL was “dreaming” if it thought it could get a price tag of $1.5 billion to $2 billion for the next round of AFL rights, which are available from 2017, and negotiations upon which start soon.

“I think it’s a joke, a complete joke,” he told Fairfax Media. “They are dreaming, they are not going to get it. Our competitors can do what they like, sports have gone up all around the world but it sounds like an *extraordinarily high price.

“People keep forgetting there is an anti-siphoning list in Australia to ensure that Australians get access to free content and if the television *advertising market has grown by 1 per cent over five years how can people say 25 per cent more for sports rights?

“I would be saying the same thing about NRL as well.” Nine has a five-year deal with the NRL whereas Seven is in the middle of a $1.25 billion five-year-deal with the AFL.”
http://www.afr.com/p/business/marke...rops_reach_rule_battle_lr5rANeZwHIN74EamaO3FP
 

Nerd

Bench
Messages
2,828
Yep AFL played the expansion card last time which has been a failure. Seven refused to pay more than the previous rights deal so I can hardly see them stumping up more this time around. Foxtel no longer has the AFL sycophant Kim Williams at the helm so good luck getting the extra 25% out of them. Looks like Demetriou bailed at just the right time.
 

docbrown

Coach
Messages
11,842
The truth is somewhere in between Gyngell's downplaying and the AFL's excessive exaggerations.

The overall market might have only grown by 1% but an individual property like AFL or NRL can grow more than that.

If the NRL is finally serious about working towards 3 live F2A slots within this existing deal and eventually a 9th game incorporating a second side in Brisbane, well it's hard not to imagine the overall audience and ad revenue increasing. That would be a big bartering chip.

The NRL should open its negotiations at the same time as the AFL.
 
Messages
16,314
The truth is somewhere in between Gyngell's downplaying and the AFL's excessive exaggerations.

The overall market might have only grown by 1% but an individual property like AFL or NRL can grow more than that.

On what fact are you basing that claim? Just because you have an extra game on free to air TV does not necessarily mean you will see a dramatically proportionate increase in advertising revenue, especially if the game is broadcast live. A live game does not give them many opportunities for add breaks to start with.
 

undertaker

Coach
Messages
11,086
Well, it depends which two additional teams could lead to the highest possible revenue increase for that 9th game.

The two candidates will be from a 2nd Brisbane team, Perth and 2nd NZ team.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
On what fact are you basing that claim? Just because you have an extra game on free to air TV does not necessarily mean you will see a dramatically proportionate increase in advertising revenue, especially if the game is broadcast live. A live game does not give them many opportunities for add breaks to start with.

maybe they get less ad breaks for live games but they could possibly charge more as it's likely it will rate better than a delayed game
 

Hello, I'm The Doctor

First Grade
Messages
9,124
Anyway, the contract is determined by competitive biding, of which direct profitability is only one factor.

There's that "halo effect", confidence in consistent ratings (sport is really the only thing that is better on tv than it is steamed a day or a week later), denying other networks of the show or even just forcing competition to pay overs.

This is probably the greatest contributor to keeping NRL from directly selling to customers and instead continuing with the intermediary...
 
Last edited:

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,587
it's about the demos, not a lot of programming can target a young male age group as effectively as sport, that's where a large chunk of the value is.
 

Starkers

Bench
Messages
3,203
The top 6 games per week are worth FTA in my view. Friday night, Saturday arvo, Saturday night, Sunday back to back and then Monday night. Costs would be higher but so would revenue. Can't see why you wouldn't try this if you were bidding next time around.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
36,583
If anything live sport is going to become more and more valuable, as it's the one thing that you have to watch first run.

Almost nothing else on TV can claim this.
 

carlosthedwarf

First Grade
Messages
8,189
Hopefully there's a Saturday FTA game in the next deal, it's ridiculous that the day is given to the AFL for free coverage.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top