Non Footy Chat Thread II

[Poupou Escobar]

Sexualised deep fakes are illegal (including distribution) and unprotected by parody exemptions. The Betoota Advocate is well aware of how harmful they are, which is why it’s chosen this response, rather than something in the same category as the Please Explain video.

 

[Gronk]

Sexualised deep fakes are illegal (including distribution) and unprotected by parody exemptions. The Betoota Advocate is well aware of how harmful they are, which is why it’s chosen this response, rather than something in the same category as the Please Explain video.

It's not law yet.

 

[the phantom menace]

Sexualised deep fakes are illegal (including distribution) and unprotected by parody exemptions.

Are they illegal if only for personal use?

 

[JohnStoppafarty]

Are they illegal if only for personal use?

Surely that's rhetorical. (?)

 

[Chipmunk]

Ask Pauline. She apparently can dish it out, but can't take it in return.

Are you suggesting The Betoota Advocate article is a true story?

 

[Twizzle]

Sexualised deep fakes are illegal (including distribution) and unprotected by parody exemptions. The Betoota Advocate is well aware of how harmful they are, which is why it’s chosen this response, rather than something in the same category as the Please Explain video.

please provide a source

 

[Poupou Escobar]

It's not law yet.

Oh well, carry on then

 

[Poupou Escobar]

please provide a source

https://www.esafety.gov.au/key-topics/image-based-abuse/report-image-based-abuse

 

[Gronk]

Are you suggesting The Betoota Advocate article is a true story?

Boom, the penny has dropped. The fine line between satire and defamation is that satirical representations can’t make accusations without factual basis.

Betoota was absolutely without any factual basis. Very cheeky. So to, it is alleged, that Pauline’s cartoon made imputations about the Irwan kid that were crazy untrue. Dunno which bits.

In summary the law says you can put shit on someone for larfs, but you can’t make shit up and then joke about that lie, for larfs.

Some might argue that comedy is dead, but it is what it is until it isn’t.

Parker, James --- "A Licence For The Satirist? The Failure Of Australian Defamation Law To Protect Satire In Political Media" [2021] UNSWLawJlStuS 21; (2021) UNSWLJ Student Series No 21-21

 

[Twizzle]

https://www.esafety.gov.au/key-topics/image-based-abuse/report-image-based-abuse

Thanks Pou but I don't see this as being complicit in your allegation (report) that the image is illegal. The eSafety Commissioner is there to offer support but it does not mention any legislation to which this image may be seen to be breaching.

It's certainly not porn, partial nudity or cultural defamation/mockery.

I would imagine this is between Betoota Advocate and the fish and chip lady rather than LU.

I do appreciate you bringing it to our attention though.

Cheers

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Thanks Pou but I don't see this as being complicit in your allegation (report) that the image is illegal. The eSafety Commissioner is there to offer support but it does not mention any legislation to which this image may be seen to be breaching.

It's certainly not porn, partial nudity or cultural defamation/mockery.

I would imagine this is between Betoota Advocate and the fish and chip lady rather than LU.

I do appreciate you bringing it to our attention though.

Cheers

The image is of Pauline Hanson engaging in a private act: https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-2017-029

 

[hindy111]

Thanks Pou but I don't see this as being complicit in your allegation (report) that the image is illegal. The eSafety Commissioner is there to offer support but it does not mention any legislation to which this image may be seen to be breaching.

It's certainly not porn, partial nudity or cultural defamation/mockery.

I would imagine this is between Betoota Advocate and the fish and chip lady rather than LU.

I do appreciate you bringing it to our attention though.

Cheers

Ban him for a fake source

 

[Twizzle]

The image is of Pauline Hanson engaging in a private act: https://legislation.nsw.gov.au/view/html/inforce/current/act-2017-029

Kissing is not a private act, it's allowed in public in this country.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Sexualised kissing is foreplay, and the article describes it as sexual. She’s probably got her hand on his cock ffs. You need to stop distributing this soft porn image.

 

[Chipmunk]

Boom, the penny has dropped. The fine line between satire and defamation is that satirical representations can’t make accusations without factual basis.

Betoota was absolutely without any factual basis. Very cheeky. So to, it is alleged, that Pauline’s cartoon made imputations about the Irwan kid that were crazy untrue. Dunno which bits.

In summary the law says you can put shit on someone for larfs, but you can’t make shit up and then joke about that lie, for larfs.

Some might argue that comedy is dead, but it is what it is until it isn’t.

Parker, James --- "A Licence For The Satirist? The Failure Of Australian Defamation Law To Protect Satire In Political Media" [2021] UNSWLawJlStuS 21; (2021) UNSWLJ Student Series No 21-21

Every article from The Betoota Advocate is made up bullshit for satirical purposes though.

 

[Twizzle]

Sexualised kissing is foreplay, and the article describes it as sexual. She’s probably got her hand on his cock ffs. You need to stop distributing this soft porn image.

yes sir, what ever you say sir !!

 

[Gronk]

Every article from The Betoota Advocate is made up bullshit for satirical purposes though.

Yes, but they do obey the ^^^^^ guidelines of satire vs defamation. Well, except when they went after Pauline.

The Betoota Advocate - Australia's Oldest And Favourite Newspaper

www.betootaadvocate.com

 

[strider]

Every article from The Betoota Advocate is made up bullshit for satirical purposes though.

Many people dont realise though. See it catch people many times. They do a good job of making it kinda believable.

 

[Soren Lorenson]

So, did Pauline kiss that Sudanese bloke or not? I'm lost.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Worse than that