mightybears
Bench
- Messages
- 4,342
North Brisbane Bears? You'd be better off throwing in Norths Devils.
Very much so, and Lloyd Weier and Mark Graham played for both Norths's!
of course they actually won premierships at Norths [brisbane!]
North Brisbane Bears? You'd be better off throwing in Norths Devils.
I know a lot of time has passed and circumstances changed, but when North Sydney last played games in Brisbane (not against Broncos) they expected 20000 plus and got less about 5000. Brisbane are not guaranteed to be the success that most people assume.
100 years on and we are talking about GROWING our game by putting teams into Brisbane and Gosford, geez!
NOrth Sydney obviously didnt think so at the time, and neither did many other people. Especially those who believed there was a huge i hate broncos sentiment.being a Sydney team playing in another state at the time, thats to be expected... captain obvious here..
Like it or not, Brisbane is a broncos town. And if any team is to succeed in Brisbane, they will need to be as successful as the broncos and a chance of winning the comp. Brisbane wont put up with winning every second week, like most sydney supporters will, because any new team will have to win enough to take supporters away from a team that they already support. Brisbane already rejected the crushers when they became losers, and will reject any new team that doesnt succeed immediately, for a decent enough stretch to gain loyalty. It is a very tough market to crack and being an ex sydney team would not help. Personally, i would love to see the Wests Panthers relocate up here and merge with the real panthers but that is not likely.whats your point?
I see those things as very valuable to Perth and Adelaide and perhaps even Wellington or christchurch, but Brisbane already has clubs that fit those bills, without the bears I dont see this as that much of a benefit to a brisbane club.Look - the obvious merits of re-establishing the Bears in Brisbane (or any existing team) are many - ie - established club structure, juniors, sponsorship, brand etc
look at the AFL - the Lions survived, and only became competitive, through a merger with Fitzroy (ironically they used to be called the Bears!).
The Qld NRL teams are all successful because they service a niche market and feed off the 'identity' of the region - ie, Gold Coast hates to be compared to Brisbane (even though they are the little brother), and so a public perception exists that they want their own identity.
likewise for NQ - rightfully having their own team as they are isolated geographically and find it difficult to support a Sth Qld team.
the Western suburbs is a great option. Don't forget the fans from out West that will embrace the team - ie Toowoomba and the further west country areas - all huge NRL supporters.
however Nth Brisbane is also a strong option.
for those suggesting that Qlders would reject a Sydney club relocating, I would disagree and argue that there are a great many Brisbane people desperate for a new team to support other than the Broncs.
As with the Lions, blending interstate with local identity can work very well.
I think it was closer to 3,000 actually [ including me!]. We beat the cows, in the days when the cows really sucked.
Of course we played there when we still had the verbal about the criteria been all good, a late move to Lang to promote the game in Brisbane on a weekend when the Bronc were away, could have played it at the NSO...................................mumbles something about NRL bastards
100 years on and we are talking about GROWING our game by putting teams into Brisbane and Gosford, geez!
It's not that great but that's where News Ltd has taken us.:x
Ah Why not have the Northern Bears based out of Darwin lol
A 4th Qld team should be bases in the Sunshine Coast .......What better team than the Manly Sea Eagles - Sunshine Coast Sea Eagles or the East Coast Sea Eagles.
While i'm at it a WA team, piss the West Tigers to Perth , now a SA team ......merge souths & Cronulla then relocate them to Adelaide = souths sharks
NRL version 11198
1. North queensland Cowboys
2. Sunshine Coast Sea Eagles
3. Brisbane Broncos
4. Gold Coast Titans
5.West Tigers - Perth
6. Souths Sharks - Adelaide
7. Northern Bears - Darwin
8. Melbourne Storm
9. Newcastle Knights
10. Central coast ????
11. Canberra Raiders
12. St.George Illawarra - 8 games in the Gong 2 games in Sydney
13. Sydney Bulldogs - merge Canterbury & the Roosters
14. Parramatta Panthers - merge Parra & Penrith
15. Auckland Warriors
16. Wellington ?????????
Brisbane doesn't want some reject Sydney suburban club.
Bears can go f**k themselves.
Yeah because NSWRL had done so much to expand in 90 years hadn't it.
They had PNG, for a brief time!