Now that thats over.....

[gregstar]

They are miles ahead of anyone else, and are perfectly suited for such a rivalry.

this year melon. don't get ahead of yourself! it will take one hell of a coaching effort to get them off the mat for next year. i can't think of a team which has bounced back from two GF losses on the trot!

 

[melon....]

They are miles ahead of anyone else, and are perfectly suited for such a rivalry.

this year melon. don't get ahead of yourself! it will take one hell of a coaching effort to get them off the mat for next year. i can't think of a team which has bounced back from two GF losses on the trot!

Definitely not StGeorge!! LOL!!

 

[woodgers]

Oh Woodie...lossing your cool I see...good thing the Mods are onto you...LOL!!!

losing it? I haven't felt this good since about 9pm last night. The mods are all over me, I have 1164 posts and that is my first edit. It actually wasn't even a bad insult. Maybe I should just blame the owners of the site, that is your style.

 

[melon....]

Oh Woodie...lossing your cool I see...good thing the Mods are onto you...LOL!!!

losing it? I haven't felt this good since about 9pm last night. The mods are all over me, I have 1164 posts and that is my first edit. It actually wasn't even a bad insult. Maybe I should just blame the owners of the site, that is your style.

Do what you like pal...enjoy your day...enjoy the Canterbury victory...pretend it was the Faders...who cares? It doesnt effect anyone but yourself!

Go Easts!!!

 

[gregstar]

Definitely not StGeorge!! LOL!!

definitley not st george :lol:

 

[miketyson]

Who are "easts"???

 

[Rusty]

Dickhead..I was banned for over a week, pull your head in before I tear it off...there's a good boy. Whats it like being owned by the Chokers of the NRL?

LOLOL!!! loser...

Melon thats funny :lol: :lol:

 

[McLovin]

Melon typifies what it is to be a rorter supporter. Arrogance, one dimmensional mind, and most of all, a willingness to call people names

#-o :roll:

 

[KFC]

Hey when it comes to calling people names his is by no means Robinson Carusoe on this board!

 

[nqboy]

Funnily enough, Robinson Carusoe has the same initials as another MIA name-caller.

 

[KFC]

Maybe he's too depressed :lol:

 

[Southernsaint]

Firstly I would like to Congratulate the Dogs on their win. The better more disciplined, more desperate side won on the night. Well done.

Secondly I would like to propose on behalf of the other Chooks fans that have been labelled as all sorts of nasty things, that we forget the past indiscretions and ill feelings stemming from 2002, salary caps, coffs harbour and the like, and celebrate a new rivallry that will surpase the rivalries of the DOgs/Eels/Dragons on the 80s.

With the talent in our youth sides, I think its safe to say lets look forward to a fierce Roosters V Dogs rivalry for the next decade.

Lets keep it clean, lets keep it hard and fair, and lets enjoy and watch this rivalry ressurect League to its highest levels of greatness.

Join with me in celebrating Rugby LEague

And we'll make sure we finish you next time

Good luck all!!!

"Let's keep it hard and fair"

Piss off, suffer in your jocks you hypocritical wanker!!

 

[Anonymous]

What SS said.

The funny thing is you've shown the same arrogance in this topic you alway have. The only difference is it's not directed at dog's fans anymore because you were humiliated last night. Arrogant sod.

 

[Generalissimo Stalin]

have to disagree as the dogs were not the better side on the night as two crucial decisions went their way and they did not win it the Roosters lost it as they had chances to nail it in those last 10 but made too many unforced errors.

Roosters were the best team over 26 weeks the true test of a team and the best club too - this one match thing is rubbish - should be best of three in that case if they still have a premier.

I will never acknowledge them as premiers in 2004.

 

[woodgers]

have to disagree as the dogs were not the better side on the night as two crucial decisions went their way and they did not win it the Roosters lost it as they had chances to nail it in those last 10 but made too many unforced errors.

Roosters were the best team over 26 weeks the true test of a team and the best club too - this one match thing is rubbish - should be best of three in that case if they still have a premier.

I will never acknowledge them as premiers in 2004.

Worst post ever numbskull. That is like me saying the Raiders didn't lose a game this year, they just ran out of time.

 

[melon....]

My thread was genuinely put to the Dogs supporters. The others need not apply as their teams are not upto scratch... :lol:

 

[Generalissimo Stalin]

have to disagree as the dogs were not the better side on the night as two crucial decisions went their way and they did not win it the Roosters lost it as they had chances to nail it in those last 10 but made too many unforced errors.

Roosters were the best team over 26 weeks the true test of a team and the best club too - this one match thing is rubbish - should be best of three in that case if they still have a premier.

I will never acknowledge them as premiers in 2004.

Worst post ever numbskull. That is like me saying the Raiders didn't lose a game this year, they just ran out of time.

with an image of george give me a triple best no wonder you have trouble understanding - the raiders did lose games this year - next when you look at the comp table it will have a p (means played) a w (means wins ) a d (means draw) and a l ( means losses) as well as for an against.

raiders had plenty of them - losses that is

 

[Generalissimo Stalin]

have to disagree as the dogs were not the better side on the night as two crucial decisions went their way and they did not win it the Roosters lost it as they had chances to nail it in those last 10 but made too many unforced errors.

Roosters were the best team over 26 weeks the true test of a team and the best club too - this one match thing is rubbish - should be best of three in that case if they still have a premier.

I will never acknowledge them as premiers in 2004.

Worst post ever numbskull. That is like me saying the Raiders didn't lose a game this year, they just ran out of time.

with an image of george give me a triple best no wonder you have trouble understanding - the raiders did lose games this year - next when you look at the comp table it will have a p (means played) a w (means wins ) a d (means draw) and a l ( means losses) as well as for an against.

raiders had plenty of them - losses that is

 

[Generalissimo Stalin]

have to disagree as the dogs were not the better side on the night as two crucial decisions went their way and they did not win it the Roosters lost it as they had chances to nail it in those last 10 but made too many unforced errors.

Roosters were the best team over 26 weeks the true test of a team and the best club too - this one match thing is rubbish - should be best of three in that case if they still have a premier.

I will never acknowledge them as premiers in 2004.

Worst post ever numbskull. That is like me saying the Raiders didn't lose a game this year, they just ran out of time.

with an image of george give me a triple best no wonder you have trouble understanding - the raiders did lose games this year - next when you look at the comp table it will have a p (means played) a w (means wins ) a d (means draw) and a l ( means losses) as well as for an against.

raiders had plenty of them - losses that is

 

[Generalissimo Stalin]

have to disagree as the dogs were not the better side on the night as two crucial decisions went their way and they did not win it the Roosters lost it as they had chances to nail it in those last 10 but made too many unforced errors.

Roosters were the best team over 26 weeks the true test of a team and the best club too - this one match thing is rubbish - should be best of three in that case if they still have a premier.

I will never acknowledge them as premiers in 2004.

Worst post ever numbskull. That is like me saying the Raiders didn't lose a game this year, they just ran out of time.

with an image of george give me a triple best no wonder you have trouble understanding - the raiders did lose games this year - next when you look at the comp table it will have a p (means played) a w (means wins ) a d (means draw) and a l ( means losses) as well as for an against.

raiders had plenty of them - losses that is