Come on Willow, it was just a simple contradiction that was picked up
You said that YOU came to the conclusion that the concept was dead in the water (for whatever reason) and then in the next post you backed up with a 'desrves a trial comment' lol.
Anyways, its a nitpick so lets keep going.
Over-exposure? Isnt that great terminology Hass? lol I must've misread it when you said "And what about the feeling you get when a match goes into extra time in the finals. You just know that it's something special". So your saying that the game is special, and not the extra time itself?? Ahhh, fair enough
Further, i have read that it will be a maximum of 10 minutes. After this, it will be declared a draw apparently (although it was a telecrap article, so take it with a grain of salt lol)
"Re. Moffo's
"And for those who think it will be over-exposed..." IMO, you are reading too much into the argument
."
I came to that conclusion based on the fact that most people are in favour of Extra-time in S.O.O and finals. Is that a fair enough assumption? Further, im assuming that people don't want that same idea applied to potentially every game of the year. Extra time is exciting (as i think most would agree), but is the idea that it would lose its 'specialness' if it was seen more often?
Re the fatigue point. Ozbash mate, as i said in my other post, assuming 9 draws over 26 rounds (being quite generous), that would involve 18 teams being involved in Extra Time. There are 15 teams in the comp, so going off that average, most players will only play a couple of Extra minutes once a year. It won't kill them. If players kick up a whinge over that, they should be kicked out of the game. I mean really, for the sake of the game, would an extra 5 minutes once a year hurt them??
Moffo
