Firey_Dragon
Coach
- Messages
- 12,099
I don't have a problem with the huge "charging" tackles being taken from the game. The ones when a player rushes out of the line and blindsides someone who doesn't see them coming.
I will miss them because they were spectacular, but I recognise there is a very small level of risk and if something goes wrong it could end up with someone really being hurt.
However, there is a mile of difference between a full on shoulder charge and the types of tackles being charged as "dangerous" or "shoulder charges" by the NRL. Shoulder charges require two main components. A shoulder being used as the point of contact and a player "charging" at his opponent. They're charging people who are standing still ffs.
Most of the tackles they are penalising have no potential to hurt anything except the game itself when they're highlighted as "dangerous".
The definition of shoulder charge needs to simplified and 90% of the tackles being penalised should be allowed and the game should carry on.
As I said earlier, the way it is ruled on needs work. There is nothing wrong with the elimination of the shoulder charge though, in principle and it is the right decision to do so.