Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Even if true, doesn't change the fact.
If true, first thing he's got right in years.
I think you are a bit bias towards those who are living and breathing the sydney game, its not our fault theres 9 teams here, this game stemmed from this city, if there's talk of conferences to cut off the expansion sides away from the core nswrl sides, we should talk about its effects not promote it, or attack those who prefer it, education is the best way to enlighten those who don't understand to flow on effect of such a brash idea, to cut of the rest of the league
They could always set up a new comp which isn’t Sydney centric and see how that goes
Do i need to bring out the calculation gif again?
Yep
Its a flawed concept, driven by those 60 yr olds that want to see nswrl resurrected, its long gone and will only hurt expansion forever
Nfl
We aren't a country that has 330 million, we dont even possess 10 percent of that, america can throw dung on a map and it could work, their conference system is a joke, why is dallas on on an eastern conference ffs?
Nrl models itself on the nfl
Hahahahaha rival leagues? 1997 was one year, one!
Super league merged with the arl
And... you cannot compare RL with NFL there 2 comps were around for a long time, theyre upto 32 clubs conferences had to come in
20 to 24 nrl teams
Pretty sure ‘the game’ stemmed from the north of England, not Sydney lol
Not this comp brother, how is that SL comp these days, following our rules yet
