DOGS AND EELS!!!
Bench
- Messages
- 4,032
Maloney 40 Carney 0
LOL by that argument:
Adam Reynolds 28 - 10 Pearce
Maloney 40 Carney 0
LOL by that argument:
Adam Reynolds 28 - 10 Pearce
Reynolds lost to a team 22-18 that Pearce beat 36-0
Pearce is a protected species, whilst all his 5/8s get punted.
Ask Roosters supporters...the defend him to the death, even though in all three games he did NOTHING
I know right......... Anasta was ok, he got cut, Soward wasn't too bad, he got the cut. Carney was a bit more effective then Pearce the series and he got cut with half as much games as pearce, now it looks like he'll be taking himself and his club mate with him. This guy has effectively ended the representative careers of 4 five-eights! Oh make that 5, he not only ended Trent Barrets Rep Career, but he put him into retirement! How good is he!?
Anasta is a lock playing on the bench for the 15th placed tigers.
Soward is in England after being not only demoted from the 14th placed merge but completely cut from them as well.
Carney is an injury prone ill-disciplined player who has only hit a purple patch again literally 6
hours ago.
Maloney will come good.
Barrett was always bog average.
-Anasta was your starting five eighth at the time
-Soward was the grand final winning five eighth at that time
-Carney was a former Daly M medalist and was playing amazingly well for the sharks and is also doing so now.
-Barret was 10x better then Pearce ever was and more successful in the origin arena than pearce could dream of
What makes you think Carney is 2nd behind Maloney? I don't really see anything in his game that would make him NSW's best 5/8. Daley even said it was more his 'combination' with Pearce that put him on the side.3. Carney was the former Dally M while playing alongside Pearce, something which he never achieved again and most certainly not at the Sharks. His time as an origin player has come and gone. He is a good player but will never be a leading playmaker. Of the 5 that you mentioned earlier he would be second best after Maloney.
What makes you think Carney is 2nd behind Maloney? I don't really see anything in his game that would make him NSW's best 5/8. Daley even said it was more his 'combination' with Pearce that put him on the side.
Debunking the myths.
1. Yes Anasta was our starting 5/8. But he was also the reason that the Roosters went so terribly. If you look at our results with Anasta in the team (2006-2012) we only made the finals twice during that period and once was when Carney was primarily 5/8. It's not our fault the selectors went with the inept Anasta but he is a curse and an invisible man and the Tigers are now suffering cause of it.
2. Soward was the GF winning 5/8, yes, but it has been proven time and time again that he cannot play under anyone other than Bennett. During his time at the Roosters under Stuart and Anderson he was essentially useless and under Brown he was dropped in favour of Ben Rogers of all people. Bennett brought the best out of him, probably via constant reassurance, something which cannot be provided at Origin stage. Regardless he did get his chance and performed poorly and never recovered from it. He was dropped to Illawarra Cutters and eventually to England. All cause he lost his coach.
3. Carney was the former Dally M while playing alongside Pearce, something which he never achieved again and most certainly not at the Sharks. His time as an origin player has come and gone. He is a good player but will never be a leading playmaker. Of the 5 that you mentioned earlier he would be second best after Maloney.
4. I had to check Barretts origin credentials cause I don't remember him being as dominant as you claim. He's played 11 games and won 4. I wouldn't exactly call that dominant but if you're basing that as being more successful than Pearce than so be it. Barrett should've been responsible for leading NSW to victory in 2008-2009 then but he didn't.
40-0 comes to mind
not this cr@p again
I agree with all of Mitchels supporters and believe Nsw should persist. He will come good eventually.