slavetothevibe
Juniors
- Messages
- 8
sorry ill just finish, antther way to do it might be to then make central coast play manly and gold coast st george to shake it up a bit in midweek.
In Sg Ball, this would have meant Manly and Newcastle would have had to win one more game en route to a semi. The 2 lowest ranked winners were Knights and Manly, and the highest ranked losers were St george and Gold Coast, again, you might want to play against the other team in that second mini round (which could contain anything between 0 and 6 games, but in reality, might only contain two or three max).
you see the thing is, everybody's complaints about this system have revolved around the fact it is sudden death, no one is taking anything away from those lower team who won their first play off game but it does seem ludicrous that the 10th, 11th and 12th teams can progress so easily after an average season where they maybe won less then half of their games.
By insterting a second round in, you give each of the top 6 a second bite of the cherry, although it is still advantageous to win this first play off games because you then get a weeks rest. This second round could even by done via "random draw" to spice it up even more. You also make the bottom 6 work slightly harder to get through. I just think it;s a little too easy to get into the 12 and then string a win together and knock out a top team. This "second round" could be changed just to the top 4 getting a second bite maybe, or even just the top 2, either way, they has to be some reward.
To be honest, the result that got my goat a bit was St George losing in teh first week after going all season unbeaten in SG ball, i felt so sorry for them, one bad day and they are out. I feel such a strong season needs to be rewarded somehow.
In Sg Ball, this would have meant Manly and Newcastle would have had to win one more game en route to a semi. The 2 lowest ranked winners were Knights and Manly, and the highest ranked losers were St george and Gold Coast, again, you might want to play against the other team in that second mini round (which could contain anything between 0 and 6 games, but in reality, might only contain two or three max).
you see the thing is, everybody's complaints about this system have revolved around the fact it is sudden death, no one is taking anything away from those lower team who won their first play off game but it does seem ludicrous that the 10th, 11th and 12th teams can progress so easily after an average season where they maybe won less then half of their games.
By insterting a second round in, you give each of the top 6 a second bite of the cherry, although it is still advantageous to win this first play off games because you then get a weeks rest. This second round could even by done via "random draw" to spice it up even more. You also make the bottom 6 work slightly harder to get through. I just think it;s a little too easy to get into the 12 and then string a win together and knock out a top team. This "second round" could be changed just to the top 4 getting a second bite maybe, or even just the top 2, either way, they has to be some reward.
To be honest, the result that got my goat a bit was St George losing in teh first week after going all season unbeaten in SG ball, i felt so sorry for them, one bad day and they are out. I feel such a strong season needs to be rewarded somehow.
Last edited: