Organised crime and drugs in sport investigation part III

[Miller was a legend]

Even Robinson's statement only goes to say Dank told him he gave players such and such substance. That doesn't mean he did, it suggests he did. Unless players or someone else says I took or gave this supplement, they need to grill Dank.

 

[El Diablo]

not according to the Elephant

 

[The Elephant In The room]

yet you think an interview with Dank is not necassary

FMD

half arsed investigation

And you think Danks will roll over and make ASADA's case if they have nothing else? He is already on record saying that he wouldn't cooperate despite the new coercive laws. Innocence and lack of evidence are completely different things, but end up with the same result usually.

Just like there is a reasonable chance that the DPP won't be able to make a case against Obeid even though ICAC found him guilty of being corrupt. You can't always prove guilt even if everyone knows it to be true.

 

[El Diablo]

And you think Danks will roll over and make ASADA's case if they have nothing else? He is already on record saying that he wouldn't cooperate despite the new coercive laws. Innocence and lack of evidence are completely different things, but end up with the same result usually.

You can't always prove guilt even if everyone knows it to be true.

one of the most geniused things i've ever read

are you related to Bunniesmong?

 

[Miller was a legend]

The point is, they need Dank. Otherwise if sanctions are issued and then fought it could be a pointless exercise

 

[The Elephant In The room]

one of the most geniused things i've ever read

are you related to Bunniesmong?

Did you not read my comments regarding Eddie Obeid? He has been found guilty by ICAC of acting corruptly, So he is guilty, but Nicholas Cowdry stated today on ABC 702 that the DPP may struggle to prove guilt in the court. Happens every f**king day.

 

[Miller was a legend]

Did you not read my comments regarding Eddie Obeid? He has been found guilty by ICAC of acting corruptly, So he is guilty, but Nicholas Cowdry stated today on ABC 702 that the DPP may struggle to prove guilt in the court. Happens every f**king day.

It was also reported another poly that ICAC labelled corrupt and referred for prosecution was clear for lack of evidence.

Shit does happen!

 

[Maximus]

Oh you were actually serious?

trust me they'll get off

Fahey seemed to presume every NRL player is guilty

WADA and ASDA are both a joke

i have no idea why he was praising the AFL based on a report done by one of they're supporters claiming they're innocent and also not one player has been interviewed

i'd say it's because a deal has been done

a deal has been done and they will not be punished

it's obvious http://www.heraldsun.com.au/afl/tea...ug-was-permitted/story-e6frf9l6-1226637145038

there already is

that's why ASADA are wrapping up their investigation before they can interview Dank and use other new powers

no AFL player will be sanctioned

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=8997140&postcount=993

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=8994166&postcount=628

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=9055545&postcount=2219

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=9092775&postcount=2366

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=9118487&postcount=2716

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=9121576&postcount=2719

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=9107641&postcount=2629

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=9140767&postcount=2839

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=9020339&postcount=1781

I could keep going.

 

[Maximus]

\Unless players or someone else says I took or gave this supplement, they need to grill Dank.

Ah haven't people been crying for ages about how the Essendon player admitted it and no infractions have been given out? I thought we were supposed to believe that one?

 

[Miller was a legend]

Ah haven't people been crying for ages about how the Essendon player admitted it and no infractions have been given out? I thought we were supposed to believe that one?

True that. Forgot about him

 

[dogslife]

Ah haven't people been crying for ages about how the Essendon player admitted it and no infractions have been given out? I thought we were supposed to believe that one?

El Dipshit and his goons bring this up almost daily. It's only been explained 5000 times he can't be suspended until they confirm what he was injected with.

 

[El Diablo]

Oh you were actually serious?









http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=8997140&postcount=993

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=8994166&postcount=628

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=9055545&postcount=2219

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=9092775&postcount=2366

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=9118487&postcount=2716

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=9121576&postcount=2719

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=9107641&postcount=2629

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=9140767&postcount=2839

http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showpost.php?p=9020339&postcount=1781

I could keep going.

i have no problem with any of those posts

what is your point?

 

[dogslife]

But of course if you throw logic at them like that you're a drug cheat apologist who should go back to bigpoofy...

 

[Miller was a legend]

Who are "them"?

 

[El Diablo]

anyone who disagrees with him

 

[dogslife]

Who are "them"?

Anyone who thinks its some sort of AFL conspiracy that he hasn't been suspended yet. Despite the fact its asadas job to establish guilt in the first place.

 

[dogslife]

anyone who disagrees with him

Asada agrees with me :lol:

 

[El Diablo]

ASADA are a joke

 

[Miller was a legend]

Asada agrees with me :lol:

But they are dipshyts

 

[Danish]

A player admitting he got injected with what he BELIEVED to be PEDs is guilty. There is no ambiguity there.

It states quite clearly in the WADA code (which is the same as the ASADA code) that providing a player knowindly attempts to use a banned substance, regardless of whether they succeed in doing so or not, they will be banned.

Section 2.2.2
The success or failure of the Use or Attempted Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method is not material. It is sufficient that the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method was Used or Attempted to be Used for an anti- doping rule violation to be committed
http://www.wada-ama.org/Documents/W...DP-The-Code/WADA_Anti-Doping_CODE_2009_EN.pdf

It is there in black and white (or green in white, as it were). If a player ATTEMPTS to use a PED - which Watson clearly stated he did - they are guilty and should be banned.

No burden of proof is required whatsoever to prove what he actually injected himself with