Organised crime and drugs in sport investigation part III

[ek999]

what article said they interviewed 130 people re Essendon?

the fact you think not interviewing Dank means nothing proves you are an idiot

FMD he is the sports scientist/biochemist behind all this alleged doping

And he is refusing to be interviewed and will challenge any attempt in court. ASADA need to weigh up whether the interview with him will provide them with any additional evidence they need against the cost (in both time and money) of fighting the court challenge.

Dank hasn't been interviewed for Cronulla either. Are you going to complain that they are doing a half-arsed job of the NRL investigation too?

 

[Maximus]

Given the lack of support ASADA has received from The Sharks (and they've had their own reasons for that), ASADA have been able to focus most of their attention and resources on the AFL. So doesn't it stand to reason that the AFL investigation would be finished well in advance of the NRL investigation?

It's best to just laugh at his stupidity rather than question it.

He cried endlessly when Graham was interviewed asking why Essendon weren't being investigated. ASADA moved onto Essendon.

He then spent the next 3 months crying endlessly about how the fact that nobody had been suspended meant that afl players were going to get off, and about how they should get on with the investigation.

After 3 months spent completely on Essendon (no Sharks players were interviewed), he is now crying endlessly because the investigation is complete.

It will be hilarious to see him if a few afl players get suspended. He has been wishing death on ASADA investigators for the last few months, and has been adamant that no afl player will be suspended throughout all of this.

Oh and Hird has come out and denied Robinson's claims, so isn't this the point we are supposed to believe him and attack Robinson?

http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl...ink/story-e6frf3e3-1226689139333#.UfoAWdLTyE4

After all, we were very quick to believe Earl's denial of any wrongdoing.

 

[dogslife]

El Diablo is clearly a closet AFL fan

 

[The Elephant In The room]

Depending on the witness, very possibly yes.

By the way, you do come across as an AFL troll.

Not a cool look bro :shock:

But does it make it half arsed? Yes, I think everyone would agree that in an ideal world Danks would have been interviewed, but when he is refusing to cooperate, you have to work with what you have, or run the risk of the entire process being stalled.

As for being an AFL troll, I think I've talked the same line in relation to both the Essendon and Sharks investigations, which is watch it unfold, expect that ASADA will do the job they are paid to do, and will do so it independently, and only then make judgements on their success depending on the facts that come out. That said, I'll happily admit that I regularly watch the AFL, ad have been supporting the Hawks just as long as I've supported the Eels. A good game of AFL is better to watch than a good game of RL IMO, but a shit game of AFL is 10 times worse than a shit game of league.

 

[El Diablo]

And he is refusing to be interviewed and will challenge any attempt in court. ASADA need to weigh up whether the interview with him will provide them with any additional evidence they need against the cost (in both time and money) of fighting the court challenge.

Dank hasn't been interviewed for Cronulla either. Are you going to complain that they are doing a half-arsed job of the NRL investigation too?

ASADA will attempt to interview him for Cronulla using their new powers

what do you think they wanted them for?

ASADA will also be doing this for their NRL investigation http://forums.leagueunlimited.com/showthread.php?p=9449022#post9449022

 

[ek999]

ASADA will attempt to interview him for Cronulla using their new powers

what do you think they wanted them for?

Source?

Or are you just making shit up once again?

 

[magpie4ever]

Depending on the witness, very possibly yes.

By the way, you do come across as an AFL troll.

Not a cool look bro :shock:

Oh no, Dingles' stormtropper is on board.:lol:

One can't present the facts without being called an ALF troll.

It is all a bloody ALP/ASADA conspricary.;-)

Go back to bigPoofy.

 

[elbusto]

Oh no, Dingles' stormtropper is on board.:lol:

One can't present the facts without being called an ALF troll.

It is all a bloody ALP/ASADA conspricary.;-)

Go back to bigPoofy.

Nice little attempt at a straw man argument there.

But no cigar.

 

[The Elephant In The room]

ASADA will attempt to interview him for Cronulla using their new powers

what do you think they wanted them for?

I'd suspect it was as much because of the arguements over "reasonable assistance" raised in the Wade Graham non-interview, as opposed to wanting to nail Dank to a chair and grill him endlessly.

 

[Maximus]

ASADA will attempt to interview him for Cronulla using their new powers

what do you think they wanted them for?

Yeah we know, it is all a conspiracy to destroy the NRL, and no AFL player will be suspended.

The only thing I'm confused about, is why bother even naming Essendon, let alone spending 3 months focusing completely on them? Surely it would be much more efficient to just not bother naming them? This is all a labor conspiracy, so Gillard should have just told them ACC to leave them out of it.

Now just to save you the trouble.

Go back to Big Poofy.

 

[magpie4ever]

Nice little attempt at a straw man argument there.

But no cigar.

 

[El Diablo]

It's best to just laugh at his stupidity rather than question it.

He cried endlessly when Graham was interviewed asking why Essendon weren't being investigated. ASADA moved onto Essendon.

He then spent the next 3 months crying endlessly about how the fact that nobody had been suspended meant that afl players were going to get off, and about how they should get on with the investigation.

prove it

the onus is on you to backup your allegations, not me

if you can;t then it is a sign of defeat

But does it make it half arsed? =

yes

 

[elbusto]

Yeah we know, it is all a conspiracy to destroy the NRL, and no AFL player will be suspended.

The only thing I'm confused about, is why bother even naming Essendon, let alone spending 3 months focusing completely on them? Surely it would be much more efficient to just not bother naming them? This is all a labor conspiracy, so Gillard should have just told them ACC to leave them out of it.

Now just to save you the trouble.

Go back to Big Poofy.

' The only thing I'm confused about, is why bother even naming Essendon,'.

They named themselves dumbo.

 

[Maximus]

prove it



yes

Are you denying that you have made the claim that AFL players would get off?

' The only thing I'm confused about, is why bother even naming Essendon,'.

They named themselves dumbo.

You are clearly behind the times. Some journalists claimed that they were told days beforehand, and so came out first. We are supposed to believe that one as it is bad for afl.

 

[ek999]

prove it

the onus is on you to backup your allegations, not me

if you can;t then it is a sign of defeat



yes

Well you are an indiot. 130 interviews and 10,000 documents isn't a half-arsed investigation

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/bombers-may-face-finals-fight-20130729-2qv2w.html

 

[elbusto]

Well you are an indiot. 130 interviews and 10,000 documents isn't a half-arsed investigation

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/bombers-may-face-finals-fight-20130729-2qv2w.html

It can be if you leave out vital witnesses you peanut.

 

[elbusto]

Loving the abuse here. High quality stuff!

 

[dogslife]

' The only thing I'm confused about, is why bother even naming Essendon,'.

They named themselves dumbo.

So on one hand you're happy to give it to Andrew Demetriou for allegedly tipping Essendon off about the impending investigation heading their way, and on the other you're happy to say ASADA wouldn't have named Essendon unless Essendon first came out?

 

[elbusto]

So on one hand you're happy to give it to Andrew Demetriou for allegedly tipping Essendon off about the impending investigation heading their way, and on the other you're happy to say ASADA wouldn't have named Essendon unless Essendon first came out?

No. I merely pointed out what happened.

You then chose to put your own spin on it.

 

[El Diablo]

Are you denying that you have made the claim that AFL players would get off?
.

prove it

the onus is on you to backup your allegations, not me

if you can;t then it is a sign of defeat