Brutus
Referee
- Messages
- 26,348
Bombers forewarned
There has been miles of praise for Essendon and the way they have handled the entire drugs-in-sport drama. But from what this columnist understands, they had far more warning that they were going to be under the blowtorch. Those with connections to the Bombers started to be interviewed by the ACC 12 months ago. And the AFL was aware of the matter for at least six months before the first Bombers press conference. Despite being a heavy-hitting club and flush with resources and funds, the report into their practices and lack of management was at least as damning as the Kavanagh report. The NRL has been suitably supportive of its players and Dave Smith, unlike his AFL counterpart, has been happy to allow natural justice to take its course. That's why he hasn't been the subject of a defamation suit from sports scientist Stephen Dank, unlike Andrew Demetriou. ASADA's main information seems to have come from the Sharks-commissioned Kavanagh report, which didn't look into whether any substance used breached the World Anti-Doping Authority's ''S2'' or ''S0'' banned lists. The rest comes from Trent Elkin, club emails and information passed on by the ACC that can't be used as evidence. Dank met the ACC for three days and was told he had nothing to worry about. Charges and convictions under WADA S2 and S0 are very rare. Globally in the last three years there have been a couple of cases - and none challenged in court.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...arks-rescue-20130518-2jta9.html#ixzz2TiQ7sjB6