What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Organised crime and ElephantJuice in sport investigation part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,830
The 7 news tonight here in Melbourne claimed in its lead news story, that she would be summoned before the Essendon Board on Wed to explain her actions.

Surely she should respond with a "Go f**k yourself"! What power do they have over a coaches wife???
 
Messages
17,552
Thank heavens everyone on this forum are open minded, fair in their appraisals of the elephant juice in sport debate and intellectually gifted in expressing their feelings about their and others clubs, officials and players.

Image what a shithole this place would be otherwise
 
Messages
17,552
The 7 news tonight here in Melbourne claimed in its lead news story, that she would be summoned before the Essendon Board on Wed to explain her actions.

Surely she should respond with a "Go f**k yourself"! What power do they have over a coaches wife???

Hope she takes a tape recorder
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
The 7 news tonight here in Melbourne claimed in its lead news story, that she would be summoned before the Essendon Board on Wed to explain her actions.

Surely she should respond with a "Go f**k yourself"! What power do they have over a coaches wife???

i saw this retweeted in my timeline

Mark Robinson ‏@Robbo_heraldsun
So, a bunch of crusty old men might summon T Hird to the boardroom to explain herself... you're kidding. Heavy handed from LIttle if true

surprising an AFL journo speaking out
 

Cletus

First Grade
Messages
7,171
The 7 news tonight here in Melbourne claimed in its lead news story, that she would be summoned before the Essendon Board on Wed to explain her actions.

Surely she should respond with a "Go f**k yourself"! What power do they have over a coaches wife???

Call me cynical but I think Hird is trying to get sacked and get a nice payout. His lawyer has already said how outrageous it is that Mrs Hird can't say what she likes and the gag is only on James. The Hirds seem to be making his employment next year unworkable.
 

magpie4ever

First Grade
Messages
9,992
Don't you think the message is...Fat Tony runs the AFL

Fat Tony would be in awe of Vlad. "Now there is a prick that knows how to run a true corrupt and criminal organisation without fear of recrimination".

If the coppers are not investigating that the Godfather leaked confidential information from a ACC report, than questions should be asked.

Bring the house of straw down.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/op...-and-reputations/story-fni0ffsx-1226863589424

This absurdity damages lives and reputations

PETER COSTELLO
Herald Sun
March 25, 2014 12:00AM

WITH the AFL and NRL football seasons now under way, we can all get back to the main topic of the winter season: just who was taking peptides and who tipped off who in the lead-up to the release of the Australian Crime Commission report codenamed “Project Aperio”.

The report, released in February last year, did not name any club or any person but it focused on the AFL and NRL, and it is now clear that the principal source of interest was Stephen Dank, one-time sports scientist at the Cronulla Sharks in the NRL and the Essendon Bombers in the AFL.

One thing those two clubs also had in common was that I was a patron for both in the early 2000s. I will say no more about that. I decline to answer any questions on the grounds that I knew nothing, Your Honour.

The Sharks’ coach, Shane Flanagan, is under a 12-month ban, as is Essendon coach James Hird. But Hird’s wife, Tania, is none too happy about his treatment. She let rip against the AFL on the ABC 7.30 program last week. It may or it may not help her case, but she has every right to say what she thinks. We are not yet at the stage where players’ wives have to get clearance from football administrators before they can give their opinions.

It was laughable to hear the AFL chorus suggest that Hird should get his wife “under control”. What is an organisation that prides itself on “progressive views” doing when it suggests that womenfolk speak only when they have the approval of their husbands? How indeed does someone get their wife under control?

So the real business of the football season has begun: who knew what, who said what to whom, and when did they say it? That will easily take up the whole of this season, just as it took up all of last season. No player has yet received an infraction notice (if they ever will) from the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority. No criminal charges have been laid and the man at the centre of it all, Stephen Dank, said last week that he hasn’t even spoken to the authorities. How did things become so absurd?

It was February 7 last year when the chief executives of all the major sporting codes of Australia lined up behind an oh-so-serious justice minister, Jason Clare, and an equally serious sports minister, Senator Kate Lundy, to announce they had “shocking” findings that would “disgust” all Australian sports fans.

They said they had evidence that ElephantJuice in sport was linked to organised crime. Senator Lundy declared the government had one simple message: “We will catch you” and “We are well on the way to seeking out and hunting down those who dope and cheat”.

Well, not so well on the way as to put someone away in prison, or to secure a conviction in court, or to hold a trial, or even to lay a charge in the past year.

The Australian Crime Commission is there to fight organised crime. I give the police the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps some charges will be laid against the criminal bosses behind this shocking business. When they are, I hope the police call a press conference to let us know about it. That’s the general idea — to call a press conference when you have something to announce, rather than to distribute vague non-specific allegations against the world at large.

When a politician makes an announcement, it is useful to have a backdrop that illustrates the point. It is good to do an environmental announcement in a forest so the camera can get footage of all those beautiful trees. Job announcements are best done on an assembly line to show people hard at work. If it is about road construction, it is best to do it wearing a hard hat with a green vest and a shovel in hand. Television is a visual medium. The footage tells the story. That is why media advisers work so hard at choosing location and backdrops.

February 7, 2013, came to be described as “The blackest day in Australian sport”. But what actually happened on that day? Was a criminal charged, or a cheat shamed out of the industry? No, it was the day when the heads of all the major sporting codes flew to Canberra to stand on a stage behind two government ministers as they claimed that organised crime had penetrated their industry. They were there to lend credibility to the claims. They were the backdrop, the footage, the props for the day. Probably they had no idea they were going to be used like that.

It was not the blackest day in Australian sport but it was a black day for the sporting CEOs. Since then, things have continued as they started: a circus of media manipulation. If this was a sporting contest, someone would blow the final siren and declare the result.

But, unfortunately, this is more serious than that. It involves people’s lives and reputations. Once you start a game like this, people are playing for keeps.

Peter Costello is a former federal treasurer and Essendon No.1 ticket holder
 

magpie4ever

First Grade
Messages
9,992
Nice article. That man makes a lot of sense.

Baa, baa, baa. You disppoint me, sir.

Peter Costello is a former federal liberal treasurer and Essendon No.1 ticket holder. Essendon - does this ring a bell, somewhere.

Enough said, just another bias article.

But, I will be glad when it is finished.
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,830
If people still bought papers, I wouldn't wipe my arse on one what contained a piece written by the No.1 Ticket Holder of an AFL club.
 

georgesnmith

Juniors
Messages
1,781
he was also the # 1 ticket holder for the sharks as well

he was responsible for the $10 million grant which they built that new grandstand with
 

ek999

First Grade
Messages
6,977
Baa, baa, baa. You disppoint me, sir.

Peter Costello is a former federal liberal treasurer and Essendon No.1 ticket holder. Essendon - does this ring a bell, somewhere.

Enough said, just another bias article.

But, I will be glad when it is finished.

He was also number 1 ticket holder of the Sharks
 

Dragonwest

Juniors
Messages
1,793
The Victorians are seriously missing the whole point. The story isn't Tania (shes just the evidence). The real story is the head of the AFL should be being investigated for potentially breaking Federal Law.
 

magpie4ever

First Grade
Messages
9,992
The Victorians are seriously missing the whole point. The story isn't Tania (shes just the evidence). The real story is the head of the AFL should be being investigated for potentially breaking Federal Law.

Spot on, and she has physical evidence (as a self proclaimed note taker). Notes taken in chronological order. That is the real story.
 

Diesel

Referee
Messages
23,796
One woman vs the AFL, I hope she brings out more dirt on the dickheads that treat woman likes she's a pet dog
 

Danish

Referee
Messages
32,020
I would expect whatever sweetheart deal the AFL made with Hird would include non-disclosure agreements, and having your wife do your blabbing for you is unlikely to get around those. If he isn't careful Hird could be sacked without the need for a payout as surely he'd be in breach of his contract by badmouthing the company he works for through a 3rd party?

Of course if the wife is simply going off what she alone witnessed and not telling stories hubby has filled her in on then the AFL are well and truly f**ked, as they'll have no recourse to reel her in (unless of course they were smart enough to get her to sign some sort of agreement as well).
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,830
I would expect whatever sweetheart deal the AFL made with Hird would include non-disclosure agreements, and having your wife do your blabbing for you is unlikely to get around those. If he isn't careful Hird could be sacked without the need for a payout as surely he'd be in breach of his contract by badmouthing the company he works for through a 3rd party?

Of course if the wife is simply going off what she alone witnessed and not telling stories hubby has filled her in on then the AFL are well and truly f**ked, as they'll have no recourse to reel her in (unless of course they were smart enough to get her to sign some sort of agreement as well).

Personally I think its to clearly deflect attention away from obvious cheating, but as a NRL fan Im happy for this to continue in earnest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top