What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

organised crime and juice of the elephant pt V

Nerd

Bench
Messages
2,827
They can't possibly say that there was enough evidence to ban Dank for life but not enough to convict even one player. Sounds like too little too late by the AFL trying to limit the damage a guilty conviction by WADA may cause.
 

elbusto

Coach
Messages
15,803
Pretty sure the afl felt there was not enough evidence to ban players, not that nothing was going on. Same reason they banned the coach and fined the club. They probably banned him for not keeping records or some BS.

Yeah - like the Club keeps records of everything else but not elephant juice so must be Dank's fault and not the Club employees:crazy:
 

elbusto

Coach
Messages
15,803
They can't possibly say that there was enough evidence to ban Dank for life but not enough to convict even one player. Sounds like too little too late by the AFL trying to limit the damage a guilty conviction by WADA may cause.

Sounds like a cover up.

Sounds like a code in denial.

Sounds like corruption.

Looks like it aint going away and they have to wear this for some years.

Feels good.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,869
Yeah - like the Club keeps records of everything else but not elephant juice so must be Dank's fault and not the Club employees:crazy:

The club have already been punished just like Cronulla. The sweet deal the Sharks players copped was to encourage them to plead guilty. If they had claimed innocence the nrl might have been in the same boat. There's a big difference having enough evidence to convict a player of illegal drug use compared to being able to find a club and suspend club staff for lack of record keeping, governance and co-operation. WADA will no doubt now see if there is enough evidence of if the afl kangaroo court has fudged the decision.
 

taipan

Referee
Messages
22,500
The club have already been punished just like Cronulla. The sweet deal the Sharks players copped was to encourage them to plead guilty. If they had claimed innocence the nrl might have been in the same boat. There's a big difference having enough evidence to convict a player of illegal drug use compared to being able to find a club and suspend club staff for lack of record keeping, governance and co-operation. WADA will no doubt now see if there is enough evidence of if the afl kangaroo court has fudged the decision.

The big difference is the NRL played a straight bat and let ASADA do its work ,without pressure or interference,then issued infration notices when ASADA had completed its work.The Sharks were punished and players accepted (in order to avoid legal costs and it being drawn out) "guilt".It is over and done with the NRL and the Sharks have moved on,the latter gaining a front of jumper sponsor.

The AFL interfered with ASADA pressuring them ,made assumptions.Essendon fought all along the way,yet they had this juice involvement for 12 months the Sharks a couple.Legal cases ensued.

When the then head of ASADA Andruska stated the NRL was professional in their handling of the matter,in contrast to the AFL,it shows the AFL and Essendon still don't get it.Long may this debacle for them continue.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,869
True but non of that relates to Danks suspension.

Their arrogance and Teflon experience is going to cost them dearly, probably. If wada find players guilty the afl's credibility is screwed for years to come, if they end up getting off due to lack of evidence then afl gloating will be intolerable.
 

taipan

Referee
Messages
22,500
True but non of that relates to Danks suspension.

Their arrogance and Teflon experience is going to cost them dearly, probably. If wada find players guilty the afl's credibility is screwed for years to come, if they end up getting off due to lack of evidence then afl gloating will be intolerable.

Well it does in fact,seeing Danks is banned from the NRL.And the NRL followed due process.

The one thing I will agree ,AFL and arrogance are like bread and honey.A match made in heaven.And may they pay in copious quantities of the green stuff ,for so doing.
 

God-King Dean

Immortal
Messages
46,614
how can they ban Dank for life if the same mob think he didn't give the players anything wrong :crazy:

you can see why WADA don't trust the AFL

Like when Demons were found not guilty of tanking - yet whole bunch of their staff got sacked, & were fined 500K
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/stephen-dank-to-receive-defamation-payout-20151224-gluw4w.html

Stephen Dank to receive defamation payout

Date
December 26, 2015

Rania Spooner and Mark Russell

Stephen Dank, the man at the centre of the Essendon supplements scandal, is expected to receive a substantial payout from the Herald Sun's publisher over a story that alleged he associated with bikies and drug dealers.

The out-of-court settlement is believed to include as much as $50,000 and comes as the controversial sports scientist prepares to file further lawsuits against sports bodies and individuals involved in the fallout from the scandal.

Fairfax Media understands that on Christmas Eve Mr Dank, who established Essendon's 2011-2012 supplements program, moved to issue subpoenas against the Australian Sports Anti-doping Authority.

He is expected to file a statement of claim against ASADA early in the new year.

Mr Dank has also appealed a lifetime ban from the sport handed down in June by the AFL's anti-doping authority, which found he had breached its Anti-Doping Code.

He claimed he was "greatly injured in his character, credit, business, personal and professional reputation and has been brought into public hatred, ridicule and contempt" by a Herald Sun article published in May 2013.

He pursued damages from the Herald & Weekly Times and two senior Herald Sun journalists for defamation, interest, costs, and aggravated damages, arguing allegations that he was linked to bikies and criminals were untrue.

Lawyers for the media organisation had stated in a defence to Mr Dank's statement of claim signed in June 2015 that the article was not defamatory and the allegations contained in it were "substantially true".

They also argued any possible damages awarded to Mr Dank should be mitigated against the fact he "did not have a good reputation in relation to dealing with hormones and peptides in a safe, permissible and legal manner".

A News Corp Australia spokesman said in a statement on Christmas Eve: "The matter has settled and we are happy with the outcome."

Mr Dank declined to discuss the settlement, which is covered by a confidentiality agreement, but said it was just one of many battles he was waging through the courts.

"I really think it's disgraceful that they've spent three years witch-hunting me when I haven't done anything wrong and that's money and resources that could have been spent on real crime and real criminals," he said.

He has also launched legal proceedings against another News Corp publication, the Daily Telegraph in Sydney, over a story about his involvement with the NRL's Cronulla Sharks and has previously flagged plans to sue ASADA's chief executive, Ben McDevitt.

Mr Dank has denied injecting Essendon players with illegal drugs and claimed they knew what they had been administered under his program.
 

Latest posts

Top