I don't think the (potential) conflict is fans v sponsors. It is the problem with satisfying one type of fan and not putting off another, and destroying the brand capital for the league as a whole.
There are so many variables B O Sp.
There are so many stakeholders that have different views of the game, and how it should be run, and how it should be supported.
We're talking about decades of conflict here, and dealing with Anglos who run the game and have no idea of the culture.
They think it's bad.
We don't.
There is clearly a middle ground to be reached and I hope it is.
Can I give you an example of where the crack down of support of sport in this country started to go wrong?
..............................Cricket.
Beach balls and Mexicans Waves.
When these things became illegal and security started ejecting fans for starting waves or throwing beach balls up at One day cricket matches, I knew this country had absolutely no f**king idea about sport and allowing it to be a fun day out. They also had no idea about the way sports fans want to support their teams.
These draconian measures were the beginning of the end.
And so it continues with the anti active support fears.
The north terrace at Parra Stadium is active at Wanderers games.
Active actually means supporting your team without the need for loudspeaker chanting. (lol - how f**king embarrassing is that at Eels games?)
Yet, Aussies can't get their heads around active support, so ultimately, it's derided in the mainstream.
I'm proud of the fact that A-League active supporter groups are actually taking on the head body and showing that fans CAN have power. United power. Even though they hate each other more than league fans could ever imagine.
I've said it before, but I wish League fans could do the same instead of whining on social media and discussion forums.
Rugby League would be in a better place if the fans actually gave a shit.
Suity
