What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

OT: Current Affairs and Politics

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,987
As opposed to the labor talking points, which are ...

😐 ... say nothing, cos we know we all have skeletons in the closet

And yes its exactly the same if the roles were reversed.
 

Bandwagon

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
44,921
There's no profit in Labor making a further martyr out of Gladys, she's still well liked in the electorate despite the findings and punching down on her now would likely just backfire politically.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,657
As opposed to the labor talking points, which are ...

😐 ... say nothing, cos we know we all have skeletons in the closet

And yes its exactly the same if the roles were reversed.
If you freeze tbe play there, there is only one side of politics who are trying to shut down the NSW ICAC, the vic version IBAC and prevent the federal version.

So say what you like and throw your look over there they all do it diversions but it's pretty clear who are scheming to maintain a certain strategy.

Of course there is dodgy politicians, but an ICAC (preferably with sharper teeth) is far better than not having any.

BTW the NSW version was introduced by Greiner after a super dodgy period of Wran etc. Here we are in 2023 and labor thinks you guys did great and the terms of reference should be expanded. Good idea ?
 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,987
Diversions? .... if we wanna talk diversions, well the masters of diversion must surely be the current federal labor mean girls ... get caught using a poor girl for political gain and lying about it, so bung on some crocodile tears and get some people to air other dirty laundry .... all good, under the rug it goes.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,657
Diversions? .... if we wanna talk diversions, well the masters of diversion must surely be the current federal labor mean girls ... get caught using a poor girl for political gain and lying about it, so bung on some crocodile tears and get some people to air other dirty laundry .... all good, under the rug it goes.
If you are fair dinkum, you would not be throwing molotov cocktails about the Higgins / Lehrmann saga as if the LNP somehow has clean or even cleaner hands.

Surely you can't be so partisan to play whatabout and ignore the horrible treatment that Canberra bestowed on those two young people. It hasn't stopped either. Some are still milking it.
 

Chipmunk

Coach
Messages
17,375
So this ICAC says that she was seriously corrupt (their words), and that serious corruption is a criminal offence under NSW law. However, they won't refer the matter to the DPP.

How can this ICAC make a finding that a criminal offence has been committed and not refer the matter to the DPP? Surely not referring a matter to the DPP when you know a criminal offence has been committed, is in itself considered corruption?
 

Chipmunk

Coach
Messages
17,375
Storm in a tea cup compared to federal rorts. Hence why they fought tooth and nail against a Federal ICAC.

Merkins will no doubt say "pfft they all do it" as some sort of a defence, but an ICAC keeps the bastards honest. It might not have the widest of powers, can't actually prosecute and can only refer to the ODPP, but it's enough to scare a bunch. Love to know why O'Farrell resigned. Was it really over a bottle of wine ? Or was ICAC sniffing around ?

Let's face it, if Alan Jones is upset that ICAC is stopping rorts, then it's probably doing a good job.

If you're suggesting a federal ICAC will lead to criminal matters relating to pork barreling by the Australian Government at the time, I suspect you'll be sadly mistaken.

A Parliamentary Committee released a report yesterday on the exact issue...All they plan to do differently is publicise (i.e. publish on a website no one looks at) the fact that someone has been pork barrelled or not.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,657
If you're suggesting a federal ICAC will lead to criminal matters relating to pork barreling by the Australian Government at the time, I suspect you'll be sadly mistaken.

A Parliamentary Committee released a report yesterday on the exact issue...All they plan to do differently is publicise (i.e. publish on a website no one looks at) the fact that someone has been pork barrelled or not.
Well I think you are paraphrasing the role of NACC in a very cheeky way.

The referral process for criminal prosecution is the same as NSW ICAC or a Royal Commission.


Then S.160 of the NACC Act states that the Commissioner can refer the matter to a Commonwealth Agency. This is the same in NSW how the ICAC refer matters to ODPP.

 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,987
If you are fair dinkum, you would not be throwing molotov cocktails about the Higgins / Lehrmann saga as if the LNP somehow has clean or even cleaner hands.

Surely you can't be so partisan to play whatabout and ignore the horrible treatment that Canberra bestowed on those two young people. It hasn't stopped either. Some are still milking it.
Ive never said anything to defend the LNP handling of it - i am sure they tried their best to sweep it away .... you are just playing old man yelling at clouds now.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,657
Ive never said anything to defend the LNP handling of it - i am sure they tried their best to sweep it away .... you are just playing old man yelling at clouds now.
In what way am I yelling at clouds ?
 

Chipmunk

Coach
Messages
17,375
Well I think you are paraphrasing the role of NACC in a very cheeky way.

The referral process for criminal prosecution is the same as NSW ICAC or a Royal Commission.


Then S.160 of the NACC Act states that the Commissioner can refer the matter to a Commonwealth Agency. This is the same in NSW how the ICAC refer matters to ODPP.

"Pork Barreling" has never been, still isn't, and never will be, illegal, under any Commonwealth legislation.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,657
"Pork Barreling" has never been, still isn't, and never will be, illegal, under any Commonwealth legislation.
Is that the reason why it was set up ? Or was it to catch merkins like this ?


 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,657
"Pork Barreling" has never been, still isn't, and never will be, illegal, under any Commonwealth legislation.
BTW, there is a school of thought that it should be tested in NSW and possibly under Federal laws.

Professor Anne Twomey argued that in some cases it could already be viewed as such under Common Law. “In short pork-barreling may satisfy conditions of corrupt conduct under the ICAC act, where there is partial behaviour that occurs for an improper purpose and in very serious cases it might even constitute a criminal offence of misconduct in public office.”

 

Chipmunk

Coach
Messages
17,375
BTW, there is a school of thought that it should be tested in NSW and possibly under Federal laws.

Professor Anne Twomey argued that in some cases it could already be viewed as such under Common Law. “In short pork-barreling may satisfy conditions of corrupt conduct under the ICAC act, where there is partial behaviour that occurs for an improper purpose and in very serious cases it might even constitute a criminal offence of misconduct in public office.”

It would be difficult to prove beyond reasonable doubt that a situation of 'pork barreling' was for an improper purpose. There are always going to be a valid excuse and justifiable reasons for decisions that are made that could be classified as pork barreling.
Is that the reason why it was set up ? Or was it to catch merkins like this ?


Well that wasn't pork barreling.
 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,987
It would be difficult to prove beyond reasonable doubt that a situation of 'pork barreling' was for an improper purpose. There are always going to be a valid excuse and justifiable reasons for decisions that are made that could be classified as pork barreling.

Well that wasn't pork barreling.
Exactly. And you will probably end up with an absolute farce where everything gets labelled pork barrelling for political purposes and the potential that legit things will get avoided for fear of been seen as pork barrelling.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,657
There is a lot of focus on pork barrelling, yet Gladys's BF is facing criminal charges for many other things. Mainly from using his position of trust to profit.


Pork barrelling, pork barrelling it's not a crime, so the whole federal ICAC thing is a waste of time ! Nope.
 
Top