State politics has shown time and time again to be far more centred than the feds.
Deserving ? That's an odd qualifier. Who determines that ?
I know who they won't vote for. A woman to lead their federal liberal party. Same goes with the Nats.
State politics has different issues it deals with (Health, Education, etc.) so needs to be more to the centre.
The Australian people are the ones who determine who is deserving, not the twitterati.
There has never been a suitable female candidate to lead the Liberal Party federally.
And you can't say Julie Bishop, because just like other times 'moderates' have lead the Liberal Party (i.e. Andrew Peacock and Malcolm Turnbull) in the last 40 years, the vote of the Liberal Party has been reduced at the subsequent Federal election.
A 'moderate' has never lead the Liberal Party into Government federally in its history, and it never will, male or female. The facts need to be stated, the Liberal Party is a conservative party, and the mainstream media and those with views of the left need to get over this fact and move on.
Let's also remember, the only time a woman has lead the Labor Party, their vote was also significantly reduced at an election. Now I'll admit this is a very small sample size, and there was more to that than the individual though.
Why would any party have a woman lead it if it isn't the best candidate? Even the Greens have more than 50% females in their party federally and choose a bloke to lead it.