- Messages
- 45,057
You missed the point. That is employers get screwed more then employees a lot of times and no one says boo.
No I didn't, there's a power imbalance there and it's well in favor of the employer. If an employee is taking the piss, you f**k them off, what have you lost? A shit employee.
It's a pain in the arse 'cause you gotta go an employ some other merkin, but no one's losing any sleep over it.
On the other hand if an employer is ripping off an employee, they are losing their income.
I mean just like they can sack someone an individual not being paid properpy also has the option to leave.
Sure, and if they don't get another job straight away, they can always sleep in the car.
Seriously dude, what we are talking about here for the most part is low skilled low paid jobs, these people aren't just walking into a better job most the time. Sure if you have in demand skills it's not hard, but usually those kinds of workers aren't getting ripped off because it's much harder to replace skilled workers.
As far as sacking someone goes ifs a huge expense. Not just for paying a bludger but for taking time to train them, iniforms, interviews. On larger scale jobs it's not so easy to spot the ones there to take it easy.
It really isn't that big a deal. If a merkin's useless or taking the piss and you don't pick it up, that's a failure of management. On a big project, it's just a bigger failure of management. And a trainee that wants to work will soon be more productive than a lazy as f**k expert.
I'm all for companies who rip workers off being exposed but where is the protection for employers hiring a lazy merkin?
Why does a business need protection from itself? No merkin forces them to hire any particular merkin, they do their due diligence, and make a decision. It doesn't take that long to check references etc, if a resume is full of shit, you'll soon find out if you make the effort.