What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

OT: Current Affairs and Politics

Messages
12,236
Neuro divergent what is it exactly? Is it a new word. When was it invented. What was this word in the 90s
It's very loosely defined... and neurodivergent a non-medical term, so heaps of people are "drawn" to it (including as an excuse for behaviours, e.g. Elon).

It's a spectrum between neuro-typical ("normal") and neuro-divergent ('different"), and is heavily dependent on someone's view of what they think the "majority" experience is - and whether they sit within or outside of that.

As for the 1990s term for "neuro-diverse", I don't know... maybe just "freak", "geek", "loser" - who knows?

 
Messages
16,007
Nor is he lying to his people and copping blow jobs from interns in the Oval Office whilst defying international law and bombing a sovereign country for 78 days in the middle of Europe and creating a criminal drug cartel state in its heartland.

Come on MITS, you’re better than that.
Is there any chance we can move away from your speciality subject of the Serbs?

We get it you will support anything that sees the US lose, power and standing at least until Kosovo isn’t a NATO member or US proxy.
 

Avenger

Immortal
Messages
34,701
Who's talking about World War 3, other than failed bully Trumpkin?

There's been stacks of wars we've participated in the 80 years since WW2. Supporting Ukraine until Russia runs out of troops and then backs away in failure (again) doesn't need to be WW3... I think you're sipping from the fake news there bro.
That’s a bit rich coming from someone who supported the Biden/Harris administration and the suggestion by them that they had to stop Putin because was going to invade Poland and the Baltic States.

Was that fake too? Or conveniently true when it suited your argument that everyone needed to $upport Ukraine.
 
Messages
12,236
Why is Trump fighting against Us again? Planning on sending US troops to fight with Russia?
That's what the discussion earlier in the thread was today, about that possibility.

Trump's strategy with Zelenskyy - along with the Trump lies about Ukraine being the aggressor etc etc - being seen as step 1 in the US potentially joining together with Russia to "end the war" (seize control or a share of those Ukrainian minerals he tried to get Zelenskyy to sign over future US access to).

The US may no longer be the allies we thought they were for Australia - Trump didn't even know what AUKUS was when he met with UK's Keir Starmer.
 

Avenger

Immortal
Messages
34,701
Is there any chance we can move away from your speciality subject of the Serbs?

We get it you will support anything that sees the US lose, power and standing at least until Kosovo isn’t a NATO member or US proxy.
Of course we can old mate. I’m just trying to demonstrate that all of them have elements of perceived corruption. Even our own nerds here in Australia have been accused of it.
 
Messages
12,236
That’s a bit rich coming from someone who supported the Biden/Harris administration and the suggestion by them that they had to stop Putin because was going to invade Poland and the Baltic States.

Was that fake too? Or conveniently true when it suited your argument that everyone needed to $upport Ukraine.
WHat's rich? My comment was shooting down your nonsense replies about WW3.

Europe and the rest of the world realise Putin is the aggressor and must be stopped, in the same way Saddam was, and countless others in difference wars since 1945. None of them required or were "World War 3" - and neither does supporting Ukraine against invading Russia and the stupid flip-flopping (Russian sidekick to be?) Trump and crew.
 
Messages
16,007
Of course we can old mate. I’m just trying to demonstrate that all of them have elements of perceived corruption. Even our own nerds here in Australia have been accused of it.
Yes but the “One side is the same as the other” is a tired old argument that hardly ever stacks up.

Are all politicians corrupt, no are some f**k yes, should we root out the corrupt again f**k yes
 

Avenger

Immortal
Messages
34,701
Yes but the “One side is the same as the other” is a tired old argument that hardly ever stacks up.

Are all politicians corrupt, no are some f**k yes, should we root out the corrupt again f**k yes
Well if you want go down that road the Clinton administration were more corrupt, irrespective of Serbia. Trump is twice the leader that f**kwit and his would be snivelling wife were.
 

Avenger

Immortal
Messages
34,701
WHat's rich? My comment was shooting down your nonsense replies about WW3.

Europe and the rest of the world realise Putin is the aggressor and must be stopped, in the same way Saddam was, and countless others in difference wars since 1945. None of them required or were "World War 3" - and neither does supporting Ukraine against invading Russia and the stupid flip-flopping (Russian sidekick to be?) Trump and crew.
Are you serious?
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,386
Peter Dutton said he was “disappointed” by Donald Trump’s treatment of Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office and said he would lobby the US president to change his view on Ukraine, if the Coalition won the coming federal election.

The opposition leader praised Zelenskyy as a “modern-day hero”.

 

Eelogical

Referee
Messages
23,682
Peter Dutton said he was “disappointed” by Donald Trump’s treatment of Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the Oval Office and said he would lobby the US president to change his view on Ukraine, if the Coalition won the coming federal election.

The opposition leader praised Zelenskyy as a “modern-day hero”.

Trump wouldn't listen to either Albo or Dutto. He probably doesn't even know who either pawns are. Has he got Shorto punted yet?
 
Top