Fair enough - no-one's saying you can't increase your hourly rate to cover what you perceive to be increased future costs (which are really just cuts to free financial assistance achieved through previous deductions). That's good economics on an individual.
Governments have to make decisions about where financial assistance is best directed in any given year, and sometimes - like in this cost of living crisis effecting everybody - the answer is to move the financial assistance to something that more of the everybody might get some benefit from, a modest increase in cash in pockets spread widely. That's also good economics, just on a wider population scale.