What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Parramatta Eels’ bold plan to become Australia’s No.1 sporting franchise

Chipmunk

Coach
Messages
17,428
I think you're missing the point.

If you are unable to maintain a high operating budget you are guaranteed to not be successful on the field.

So you need a high operating budget just to be a fair chance. Once you're a fair chance then it's just a numbers game against all the other clubs that spend enough on their football operations (e.g. If there are six such clubs then you are a one in six chance, for example).



Don't confuse financial stability with the size of the operating budget. Look at Manly up until Des jumped ship - they were spending well beyond their means (feeder club in the QLD Cup plus huge scouting/recruiting budget) and so were successful on the field.

So what are you saying here Pou Bear, that you need generate more money to spend, but not neccessarily make a profit?
 

Forty20

First Grade
Messages
7,677
Yeah, I found the $1million profit a year just bizarre... What are we going to do with our $1million a year profit????

Not sure if it was discussed earlier in the thread but last night Seward made it clear that he wants the Football Operations to stop relying so heavily on the Leagues Club. They made big strides forwards in the year just passed by reducing the LC grant after a massive budget blowout in 2013 (if I am recalling his speech correctly).

The goal for $1 million dollar profit is an extension of that. Turning the Football Operations into a profit would be a significant milestone.
 

souths_pride

Juniors
Messages
1,155
I think you're missing the point.

If you are unable to maintain a high operating budget you are guaranteed to not be successful on the field.

So you need a high operating budget just to be a fair chance. Once you're a fair chance then it's just a numbers game against all the other clubs that spend enough on their football operations (e.g. If there are six such clubs then you are a one in six chance, for example).



Don't confuse financial stability with the size of the operating budget. Look at Manly up until Des jumped ship - they were spending well beyond their means (feeder club in the QLD Cup plus huge scouting/recruiting budget) and so were successful on the field. Recently the money ran out which is why Hasler left, and why ownership recently changed hands.

A similar thing happened in the 90s - they made three straight grand finals then went broke and had to merge.

I agree with what your saying about an operating budget but surely all the profits a club generates should go back into football! So what I'm trying to imply is that if your financially stable, then you should in theory have a decent operating budget. In saying that, I haven't done an audit of every single club's income but I would be very surprised if clubs have any income for things other than football related investments.
 

souths_pride

Juniors
Messages
1,155
Not sure if it was discussed earlier in the thread but last night Seward made it clear that he wants the Football Operations to stop relying so heavily on the Leagues Club. They made big strides forwards in the year just passed by reducing the LC grant after a massive budget blowout in 2013 (if I am recalling his speech correctly).

The goal for $1 million dollar profit is an extension of that. Turning the Football Operations into a profit would be a significant milestone.

I agree with you on that! I think the era of relying on leagues clubs for funding is coming to an end. I haven't seen the numbers myself but I just don't think LC's generate or are able to grant enough money on a continual basis to support clubs these days given the money that is now involved in league.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,147
I agree with you on that! I think the era of relying on leagues clubs for funding is coming to an end. I haven't seen the numbers myself but I just don't think LC's generate or are able to grant enough money on a continual basis to support clubs these days given the money that is now involved in league.

From today's Telecrap....

Parramatta Leagues Club had its best year in more than a decade, finishing with a profit of $12.5 million.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...ancial-situation/story-fnp0lyn3-1227238947334
 

souths_pride

Juniors
Messages
1,155
What is the purpose of having a Leagues Club if it cannot fund it's constituted purpose?

I'm not saying that Leagues clubs don't have their place. What I was saying that the era of relying on them as the main source of funding for footy teams is coming to an end. In this era, clubs need to find ways of standing on their own two feet in terms of generating income i.e. like Souths and Penrith.
 
Last edited:

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,485
I agree with what your saying about an operating budget but surely all the profits a club generates should go back into football! So what I'm trying to imply is that if your financially stable, then you should in theory have a decent operating budget. In saying that, I haven't done an audit of every single club's income but I would be very surprised if clubs have any income for things other than football related investments.

It is easy to stay financially stable just by spending within one's means. That could mean spending less on football operations than other clubs.

So financial stability doesn't equal a big budget. In fact it could easily mean the opposite. Seward is talking about being a club that makes more money, not one that spends less.
 
Top