I think you're missing the point.
If you are unable to maintain a high operating budget you are guaranteed to not be successful on the field.
So you need a high operating budget just to be a fair chance. Once you're a fair chance then it's just a numbers game against all the other clubs that spend enough on their football operations (e.g. If there are six such clubs then you are a one in six chance, for example).
Don't confuse financial stability with the size of the operating budget. Look at Manly up until Des jumped ship - they were spending well beyond their means (feeder club in the QLD Cup plus huge scouting/recruiting budget) and so were successful on the field.
So what are you saying here Pou Bear, that you need generate more money to spend, but not neccessarily make a profit?
Well what else would they do with the profit?
Well what else would they do with the profit?
yep profit is useless to a club if it doesn't go back into the club
Well what else would they do with the profit?
Yeah, I found the $1million profit a year just bizarre... What are we going to do with our $1million a year profit????
Yeah, I found the $1million profit a year just bizarre... What are we going to do with our $1million a year profit????
I think you're missing the point.
If you are unable to maintain a high operating budget you are guaranteed to not be successful on the field.
So you need a high operating budget just to be a fair chance. Once you're a fair chance then it's just a numbers game against all the other clubs that spend enough on their football operations (e.g. If there are six such clubs then you are a one in six chance, for example).
Don't confuse financial stability with the size of the operating budget. Look at Manly up until Des jumped ship - they were spending well beyond their means (feeder club in the QLD Cup plus huge scouting/recruiting budget) and so were successful on the field. Recently the money ran out which is why Hasler left, and why ownership recently changed hands.
A similar thing happened in the 90s - they made three straight grand finals then went broke and had to merge.
:lol:More elevators?
Suity
Not sure if it was discussed earlier in the thread but last night Seward made it clear that he wants the Football Operations to stop relying so heavily on the Leagues Club. They made big strides forwards in the year just passed by reducing the LC grant after a massive budget blowout in 2013 (if I am recalling his speech correctly).
The goal for $1 million dollar profit is an extension of that. Turning the Football Operations into a profit would be a significant milestone.
I agree with you on that! I think the era of relying on leagues clubs for funding is coming to an end. I haven't seen the numbers myself but I just don't think LC's generate or are able to grant enough money on a continual basis to support clubs these days given the money that is now involved in league.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...ancial-situation/story-fnp0lyn3-1227238947334Parramatta Leagues Club had its best year in more than a decade, finishing with a profit of $12.5 million.
What is the purpose of having a Leagues Club if it cannot fund it's constituted purpose?
What is the purpose of having a Leagues Club if it cannot fund it's constituted purpose?
I agree with what your saying about an operating budget but surely all the profits a club generates should go back into football! So what I'm trying to imply is that if your financially stable, then you should in theory have a decent operating budget. In saying that, I haven't done an audit of every single club's income but I would be very surprised if clubs have any income for things other than football related investments.