Poupou Escobar
Post Whore
- Messages
- 91,379
Nobody thinks they're part of a faction. That includes you.A merkin faction like them for instance???
Nobody thinks they're part of a faction. That includes you.A merkin faction like them for instance???
So they weren't a faction before they were elected????Nobody thinks they're part of a faction. That includes you.
I'm well mate, but i just can't believe what our club has been turned into. I live in Brisbane and my mates don't even give me stick anymore and all i get is pity. That says it all, QLDers are the most smug gloaters of the lot but when they don't bother anymore you know how low we have sunk.I can't believe 8 years has gone by since I last got involved I the inhouse politics. And it seems worse now than what it was 8 years ago. I've debated for weeks whether it's time to return after watching from the sidelines for so long.
And to answer the question, I've been well mate. And you?
So they weren't a faction before they were elected????
So these factions just need to get elected and then they aren't faction anymore????
you're f**king kidding?????????
watch for BA to walk...
hope the merkins that are there are satisfied.
Incredible. Losco should have been given the reasons his proposal didn't get up. We have to get everyone who is a voting member there at the EGM to get a vote of no confidence in the current board and to back Losco's proposal. I have little confidence in either the clubs legal team or whatever consultant they have used. We need a new, clearer constitution and separate boards.With all due respect Gronk, that is a bit rich unless you know the reason for the petitions being rejected.
I know that in the case of the Losco petition, 3 lawyers reviewed the petition before it was finalised and found nothing wrong with it. Unfortunately it seems the external lawyers paid for by the Club at the behest of the Directors managed to interpret the Constitution somewhat differently although at this stage Losco has not been advised of why the petition failed.
Incredible. Losco should have been given the reasons his proposal didn't get up. We have to get everyone who is a voting member there at the EGM to get a vote of no confidence in the current board and to back Losco's proposal. I have little confidence in either the clubs legal team or whatever consultant they have used. We need a new, clearer constitution and separate boards.
LolBevan Paul has a lot to answer for IMO. He's the first to go when new management take control.
IIRC they were prepared to give him the gig but he wanted guaranteed tenure for 2 years ?He's one of the few people at the club who was employed on his merits and done a good job. The board not wanting to give him the group CEO's role is only a positive in my eyes. Shows he's not a yes man and a puppet like the last two CEO's employed.
I thought it was for at least 12 months, can you blame him??? How many CEO's have we churned through the last 5 years??? One of the board members carried on like a pork chop and said no way will there be another Fitzy doing both roles on their watch.IIRC they were prepared to give him the gig but he wanted guaranteed tenure for 2 years ?