What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Parramatta Leagues Club board sacked, administrator appointed

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,719
A friend of mine was a contestant on Gladiators. Got to the semis IIRC.

Not when Mark McGaw was doing it. The second time around.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,717
Obviously Stuart didn't build the Roosters side that won that year, and they did decline (after three straight grand finals). But his alleged inability to coach didn't stop him winning a premiership.

I didn't claim Stuart was a great coach, I just disproved the claim that he is rubbish. There is a middle ground, as proved by Stuart's premiership and his wooden spoon. He seems to be building well at Canberra too.
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...er-to-keep-clubs-in-line-20160730-gqh6u4.html

Parramatta Eels crisis shows NRL will use state government to keep clubs in line

When Denis Fitzgerald was asked to leave the foyer of Rugby League Central where he was poised to conduct a one-man vindictive press conference, gloating over the sanctions imposed on five Parramatta officials for salary cap cheating, it symbolised the end of the code's ancient regime.

Fitzgerald, the former "Emperor of Parramatta", who set up the governance structures that allowed the later faction fighting and vote buying to develop, was forced to stand under a Moreton Bay fig tree in nearby Moore Park and address the TV cameras.

The NRL's action that May day cemented a giant signpost in the ground: the era when rugby league officials lived by the dictum "never tell a lie unless it is absolutely necessary" was over.

Any NRL club official who flaunted the rules and lied to the NRL integrity unit would be excluded from the game.

Furthermore, it sent a clear signal that the NRL would pressure the NSW government to achieve its ends. The code has joined the AFL as a sport that uses political power to force change.

The NRL had spent 20 years waiting for its chance to reform the Eels. The process of club reform started under former NRL chief executive Dave Smith with the restructure of the Gold Coast Titans, Wests Tigers, Cronulla Sharks and Newcastle Knights. The opportunity to reform these clubs presented itself through their destitute financial positions or, in the case of the Sharks, a doping crisis.

In these cases, the NRL was able to deliver regime change through its chequebook or the threat of fines.

The Eels were a much harder nut to crack. With the financial power of the Parramatta Leagues Club behind it, the Eels have never wanted for money. The leagues club will have to bail out the football club for more than $10 million in 2016. That's an amount that few leagues clubs, other than Parramatta, could afford.

The NRL's opportunity to force reform at the Eels was not through financial pressure, rather, Parramatta handed the league its opportunity through the shambolic salary cap scheme its directors had cooked up to try to return the club to the glory days.

NRL chief executive Todd Greenberg has forged a strong relationship with NSW Premier Mike Baird. The benefits of that co-operative spirit were writ large in the government's decision to side with the NRL and dismiss the Eels board.

Shortly after the NRL's initial decision to stand the Parramatta five down, I forecast the intervention of Baird, writing in The Sun-Herald in May that the NRL was likely to be the least of Parramatta's problems.

"It's not the first time the leagues club has been investigated by Liquor and Gaming, and with the NSW government's investment of more than $300 million into a new stadium adjacent to the club, you can be sure the Baird government will take the opportunity to cleanse the palace. Baird won't want a whiff of corruption near his sparkling new stadium.

"In short, the NRL's investigation and penalties may be the least of the problems facing those directors who straddle the leagues club and the football club."

The government's Office of Liquor and Gaming ultimately brought the guillotine down on the Eels board. It was a decisive step from the department but, ultimately, the job was made much easier for the department by the investigative report compiled by the leagues' integrity chief Nick Weeks and his team.

It took the NRL some time to achieve its ends, initially believing the salary cap breaches at Parramatta were the result of incompetence, rather than wilful cheating. But, ultimately, the integrity unit's investigation into the Eels led to financial penalties, the cancellation of registered officials and, finally, the appointment of an administrator.

It has been the best piece of work the integrity unit has done in terms of the degree of difficulty and the ultimate benefit for the game, contrasting with the 2010 ad hoc draconian punishment of the Storm for salary cap breaches much less than the Eels.

Whereas the stripping of multiple premierships from the Storm and the forced exit of half its roster could have been a death sentence for the Melbourne club, the NRL used the Parramatta opportunity to put in place structures that could restore the Eels to their former greatness.

One NRL official put it best, saying: "The lasting legacy from this untidy phase of rugby league history has been a once-in-a-generation opportunity for the Eels to emerge as the superpower they were always supposed to be."

It is also a clear marker of a growing sophistication within the NRL and a willingness to pursue bespoke methods of dragging its more recalcitrant clubs into the modern world.

As to the future, the Eels fans are the big winners out of this mess. The club will emerge stronger for the experience and that is a big win for the league and for Baird's broader vision for Parramatta and western Sydney.

Comedian Brian Doyle joked that Baird could have used Fitzgerald and the Parramatta board for another, less popular government foray into sport.

"Rather than ban greyhound racing, Baird could have put the Parramatta officials in charge of it," Doyle quipped.
 

ash411

Bench
Messages
3,411
When Denis Fitzgerald was asked to leave the foyer of Rugby League Central where he was poised to conduct a one-man vindictive press conference, gloating over the sanctions imposed on five Parramatta officials for salary cap cheating, it symbolised the end of the code's ancient regime.
Good. so they should. He has no reason to be at League HQ, or anywhere else giving a "press conference".
 
Messages
15,510
SMH.com.au said:
The NRL claims to want more female board directors, and I wish them luck.

I have been dragged into NRL and NSW government investigations and, to my knowledge, I have not been found guilty of anything. I was also asked to stand aside from an area health board I served for five years.

All of this happened despite there being no findings against me and no suggestion of any impropriety at all.

Indeed, I am yet to face an allegation of any kind.

Yet here we are – elected board members effectively sacked, though we have not breached rules or been subjected to any negative findings.

It seems mine is guilt by association with the so called "gang of five". Five men who were determined guilty and pilloried publicly before being able to answer the charges against them.

NRL chief executive Todd Greenberg occupies a powerful position: he is judge, jury, executioner, media commentator and now it seems a political lobbyist who can take out boards he is not happy with. He was also a personal referee for former Eels employee Scott Seward, whose as-yet untested statement was the prime evidence used against his former employers.

The untold story is that of a potentially unreliable witness, less than due process, a decision to ignore all of the governance reform work undertaken by the board and a public flogging.

There is a truckload of evidence to support this proposition.

Full evidence of the extent of the alleged fraud at the Eels was not revealed to the board until the NRL preliminary breach notice was issued and access granted to some of the incriminating statements and transcripts gathered by the NRL.

It was upon seeing this that the board itself duly referred the matter to the NSW Police.

There was a text message provided to the Eels in which a senior staff member of the NRL suggested the NRL integrity unit had breached confidentiality, resulting in a leak to the media while the investigation was under way.

This revelation wrecked the relationship between the club and the NRL.

The club continually asked for procedural fairness and was denied.

Worse still, directors who hadn't breached the rules were subject to a scathing public commentary from Greenberg.

So what, some may say. It's a tough game and that's the way the world works. I disagree. People's reputations and livelihoods are at stake. So is the great Parramatta brand. And who's to say who the NRL will next decide to take aim at?

The Eels board was also not given any credit for implementing more than 100 recommendations for improving governance from PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Nor for the fact that the administrator has inherited a financially sound club with a blueprint for reform that's already under way.

The board also hired Australia's foremost salary cap expert Ian Schubert, who told the board that the breaches in the cap were nowhere near the scale suggested by the NRL.

Engaging independent auditors and experts and making referrals to police are hardly the acts of people not committed to good governance.

These efforts were ignored. Instead, people who were reforming the club were given the option of resigning or being sacked.

The board is still to see all of the evidence the NRL had gathered in its investigation into the club. There are several transcripts from former Eels employees which the NRL refused to provide. It is not known why that is.

The state government, in responding to the shrill cries of some media and the NRL, has taken the unprecedented step of appointing an administrator to a financially secure club.

In the final week of the board's existence numerous indirect approaches were made about dropping the appeal.

Surely now, the right thing to do is allow the NRL appeals committee chairman Ian Callinan to review the Greenberg decision.

Allow the former High Court justice to investigate the concerns about Greenberg's relationship with Seward and his choice not to recuse himself from the investigation.

Allow the NRL's own process to take its course.

There should also be a formal independent review of the NRL's decision

The administrator must support this to demonstrate that he has the club's best interests at heart.

Since the great game is built on fairness and respect, the administration of the game and the clubs within it must have the very same foundation.

My experience indicates the NRL has a very long way to go in achieving this.

Tanya Gadiel was a short-term Parramatta Eels board member and a former state MP and deputy speaker.
Link http://www.smh.com.au/comment/the-u...he-parramatta-eels-board-20160730-gqhfyb.html
 

phantom eel

First Grade
Messages
6,327
Our only hope of getting strong female directors on our future Board imo is for these to come from the independent apointee Directors.

We may not have the eligible candidates within our 3-year qualified membership base. Look at our track record of who we've elected - Cecelia Fong (?) appointed just prior to 3P takeover, Lyn Bruce (?) elected with 3P, Tanya Gadiel elected with Sharp's team.
 

ash411

Bench
Messages
3,411
Our only hope of getting strong female directors on our future Board imo is for these to come from the independent apointee Directors.

We may not have the eligible candidates within our 3-year qualified membership base. Look at our track record of who we've elected - Cecelia Fong (?) appointed just prior to 3P takeover, Lyn Bruce (?) elected with 3P, Tanya Gadiel elected with Sharp's team.
If they're planning to separate the PLC and NRL boards, surely the 3 year requirement wouldn't apply for the NRL board, no?
 

ash411

Bench
Messages
3,411
Wouldn't think so.
In fact, being a PLC member shouldn't be necessary at all.

Although I think being a BGA member (as we don't have a football club anymore) probably should be, but then they can just get one, I don't see why we should exclude qualified interested people on a technicality like that. At the very least not this go around anyways.
 

Oscarman

Juniors
Messages
1,908
In fact, being a PLC member shouldn't be necessary at all.

Although I think being a BGA member (as we don't have a football club anymore) probably should be, but then they can just get one, I don't see why we should exclude qualified interested people on a technicality like that. At the very least not this go around anyways.
It should purely be about getting the best people on the board. The 3 year rule just perpetuates the factions and limits the talent pool. PDRLC should have never been wound up.
 

phantom eel

First Grade
Messages
6,327
That's what I mean. When they separate the PNRL board from the PLC one, then only the PLC Board has member eligibility requirements.

PLC Board will contribute a couple of nembers to the PNRL Board, the rest will or should be (independent) appointments. Since we no longer have a Football Club as such (thanks 3P) there is no relevant membership base to vote in a PNRL election - and I'd expect at least initially our PNRL Directors to be appointed rather than voted in by "us".

After all, our member voting record is pretty poor... Spags and his Cowboys folliwed by Sharp and his cronies. Max has to save us from ourselves!
 

Latest posts

Top