Why are we continually buying players that are at the end of their careers.
I don't care tbh. I want depth props & quality starting back rowers with size & aggression.
Because our recruitment is hands down the worst in the competition.
Why are we continually buying players that are at the end of their careers.
Because our recruitment is hands down the worst in the competition.
Pat is in another class to Reddy and Utai,but he will not turn us from a cellar dweller into a top team.We have to target elite players at their prime if we are ever to compete with the big boys.Okay if Potter can get some real class to come on board,big Pat will be a handy pick up,but on his own nothing will change
Yet our retention is arguably the best in the comp.
In 13 years we have only lost a handful of players we wanted to keep.
Prince and Richards two of the man ones...........in 13 years.
Yet our retention is arguably the best in the comp.
In 13 years we have only lost a handful of players we wanted to keep.
Prince and Richards two of the man ones...........in 13 years.
I would add Fifita, Gibbs and Hodgson to the list of lost talent, but retention also refers to keeping deadwood, aka Fitzhenry, Moltzen, Utai, Lote...
Fafita, Gibbs and Hodgson were moved on. They were told to look elsewhere.
As i said, we have lost very few players in 13 years that we wanted to keep.