Why would you guess that? Also irrelevant if she’s a citizenI guess this monster wasn't born in Australia?
Why would you guess that? Also irrelevant if she’s a citizen
Not if she’s an Aus citizen. You can’t be deported if you have citizenship, Australian born or not.Relevant if she's convicted.
Yes.Not if she’s an Aus citizen. You can’t be deported if you have citizenship, Australian born or not.
Not if she’s an Aus citizen. You can’t be deported if you have citizenship, Australian born or not.
She CAN be deported, if convicted and if she is not an Australian citizen.She can't be deported anyway. Just racists being racist
She CAN be deported, if convicted and if she is not an Australian citizen.
Have a read.
Deporting Non-Citizens Who Commit Crimes
Did you know that if you’re a non-citizen who is convicted of a criminal offence, you can be deported or have your visa cancelled in some cases? Read our blog.www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au
Multiple ways there.
I didn't confirm either of your points.Thank you for confirming my point.
I didn't confirm either of your points.
One I proved incorrect, if she isn't an Australian citizen. If she is an Australian citizen then she obviously can't be deported. Which I said right at the outset.
The other wasn't a point so much as an assumption. And, in my case, a long way off the mark.
The derp factor is realI wish the magistrates who gave her soft sentences were deported to a prison cell alongside Uiatu Taufua.
Settle petal.I'm not your dude.
Show me where I said "A brown person is not an Aussie". You seem to like throwing the "OOOOH OOOOH RACIST" slur around. Show me a single thing I've posted in this thread that is directly racist, rather than your own hypersensitivity.
I don't care what colour criminals are. Nor what race/religion/nationality/gender. If they are not Australian citizens they should be returned to their country of nationality either after serving their term of imprisonment or , preferably, immediately on conviction. And I would expect no less of foreign countries in their dealings with criminals of ours convicted in said countries.
The character test is an avenue for deportation, no legal precedent doesn't mean it can't happen. A precedent is something that is "set". If the government has an appetite for it then they'll have a go. Not to mention Governments change laws all the time. Retrospectivity would be useless in this case, but it'd be there for the next grub.
It is all, as I've repeatedly said, a moot point if Joan is a citizen.
Here‘s an idea … why don’t we find a really remote island where we can send all our criminals? - oh, er, um, … on second thought …
What I really like is that they sent convicts to Sydney. If you were naughty there, Cockatoo Island. If you were naughty there, Van Diemen's Land. If you were naughty there, Norfolk Island!
Surely a system that worked!
Tasmania?Here‘s an idea … why don’t we find a really remote island where we can send all our criminals? - oh, er, um, … on second thought …
I’m from Tasmania. Go away!Tasmania?
Why?Settle petal.