What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Perth Bears or bust?!

siv

First Grade
Messages
6,748
Because it's irrelevant.
And as simple as that - you fail to understand why a Pay-TV operator would spend $350 mil to try to win the rights to RL, and then put itself in control of RL for the next 20 years

Ribot was just a pawn, who was used to achieve a means

And today you see how little Ribot's vision mattered 25 years on when we are on verge of returning to a structure where it all began
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,672
Without success of expansion teams idea of creating new comp would have never been formed.
Your kinda got a point that once the broncos entered the comp things had to change because they were so much bigger than everyone else

your wrong about the like of Newcastle Canberra or cowboys back then being big teams for super league … they were the opposite

Arko said his biggest mistake was not admitting two Brisbane clubs at once but they wanted the broncos to be strong

had they admitted two Brisbane clubs at once then super league would never have happened
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,672
And as simple as that - you fail to understand why a Pay-TV operator would spend $350 mil to try to win the rights to RL, and then put itself in control of RL for the next 20 years

Ribot was just a pawn, who was used to achieve a means

And today you see how little Ribot's vision mattered 25 years on when we are on verge of returning to a structure where it all began
He promised rugby league in China

whilst almost killing it in’s Australia

brilliant
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,123
And as simple as that - you fail to understand why a Pay-TV operator would spend $350 mil to try to win the rights to RL, and then put itself in control of RL for the next 20 years

Ribot was just a pawn, who was used to achieve a means

And today you see how little Ribot's vision mattered 25 years on when we are on verge of returning to a structure where it all began

No I don't. Genesis of superleague was in Ribot's head. Rupert wasn't sitting around thinking about starting his own league comp (he was probably thinking of taking over usa cable news at the time). Pay tv side I never argued or disagreed with but you were probably just going to post it anyway..
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,123
Your kinda got a point that once the broncos entered the comp things had to change because they were so much bigger than everyone else

your wrong about the like of Newcastle Canberra or cowboys back then being big teams for super league … they were the opposite

Arko said his biggest mistake was not admitting two Brisbane clubs at once but they wanted the broncos to be strong

had they admitted two Brisbane clubs at once then super league would never have happened

Cowboys hadn't had a game in 1994. Trio of Raiders, Newcastle & Broncos were attendance leaders & successful on field too (Newcastle made semi's in 92 but of course other two were at different level).
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,672
No I don't. Genesis of superleague was in Ribot's head. Rupert wasn't sitting around thinking about starting his own league comp (he was probably thinking of taking over usa cable news at the time). Pay tv side I never argued or disagreed with but you were probably just going to post it anyway..
Murdoch owned Ansett sponsored arl so they knew how profitable the game was

and the idea of super league was as much Wayne Bennett as John ribot
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,672
Cowboys hadn't had a game in 1994. Trio of Raiders, Newcastle & Broncos were attendance leaders & successful on field too (Newcastle made semi's in 92 but of course other two were at different level).
Newcastle have been a basketcase until tinkler and then wests Newcastle as owners

raiders couldn’t afford to keep their stars easts were about to raid them
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,123
Murdoch owned Ansett sponsored arl so they knew how profitable the game was

and the idea of super league was as much Wayne Bennett as John ribot

Then Murdoch should've approached broncos about new comp rather than other way around. Everybody knows pay tv was factor in war, but that's not the origin of the idea.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,672
Then Murdoch should've approached broncos about new comp rather than other way around. Everybody knows pay tv was factor in war, but that's not the origin of the idea.
Broncos were the origin

and not to grow rugby league

Neither Murdoch or the broncos could’ve cared less about growing rugby league
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,123
Newcastle have been a basketcase until tinkler and then wests Newcastle as owners

raiders couldn’t afford to keep their stars easts were about to raid them

???

Raiders could afford to pay above the cap!!

Newcastle averaged 20k home attendance in 1994 second only to Brisbane. Raiders third with 17k.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,672
Agree about Murdoch (Lachlan who was close to game might care a tiny fractor tho probably not), but I never argued any of this.
Your saying the idea of super league was to grow the game (big clubs etc)

thats bs

News ltd got the pay tv rights cheap and the broncos killed off the crushers and any other Brisbane side until 2015

rugby league got set back 20 years
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,123
Your saying the idea of super league was to grow the game (big clubs etc)

thats bs

News ltd got the pay tv rights cheap and the broncos killed off the crushers and any other Brisbane side until 2015

rugby league got set back 20 years

None of this was something I was arguing..
 

Latest posts

Top