Chicken_Hunter
Coach
- Messages
- 17,035
Azkatro said:Chicken_Hunter said:So best console game in show at E3 means xbox isnt fun, means xbox is a faulure??(Halo 2)
Having the most played game in the world come to xbox isnt fun?(counter strike)
Having Playstations 'funnest' game come to xbox isnt fun either is it? (GTA)
Meeting expected sales totals is a failure?
Having more online players than PS2 even though ps2 has sold about 10 times more units and had the entire market before xbox is a failure?
The people will buy it. A lot of people didnt buy xbox's because they already had playstations.. It will be a different story this time around. I myself had a playstation, but it sucked, way too slow, the games sucked and its dvd quality was atrocious. So i sold and got an xbox.
Jeez you spin some crap mate. I have never seen one person spin off so many baseless "facts" off the top of their head in their life and here you are dumping more rubbish in a single thread than I've ever seen.
I'd challenge all of your claims but I can clearly see that you're going to just respond with more made up crap. Wake up to yourself. DVD quality was atrocious? I've never seen so much rubbish in my life.
The PS2 is advertised more than Xbox? What a total load of crap! The Xbox has superior hardware? Even more rubbish! Considering the Xbox is basically a PC in a box, and that the x86 architecture has been around since the XT's, I would hardly call that superior gaming hardware. Specs-wise, the PS/2 is less than half the speed of the Xbox; 733MHz processor compared to 294 odd, 64mb of RAM compared to 32mb, 133MHz bus speed compared to a mere 33/36, etc etc. Additionally, the Xbox comes with built in hard disc, ethernet etc.
Consequently Microsoft lose ridiculous amounts of money on each Xbox sold, just so it can compete with the PS2. This cannot and will not last forever. And if Xbox continues to put PC hardware in future releases of their consoles, they will continue to have a torrid time breaking even.
Microsoft only understands one thing, and that is how to establish and maintain a monopoly. Their plan is to make an initial (and quite massive) loss on the Xbox to gain market share, gradually kill off the competition, then emerge as the only viable alternative. Then what? We have to pay $1000 to get the latest console because it's based on PC hardware? Doesn't sound like much fun to me.
Sony are on the path of traditional gaming consoles and that is releasing a product that is optimised for gaming, keeping the costs down. Microsoft don't do this. I'd be willing to bet they have no choice but to say they're meeting sales expectations to keep their competitors on their toes.
What did i say that was crap?
Halo 2 won best console game at E3
Xbox has counter strike which is the biggest multiplayer game ever(on PC)
Xbox has GTA
Xbox live does have more users
PS2 dvd quality is crap, how come a bunch of my dvds got played in black and white on PS2? Xbox plays them fine.
Where did i say playstation has had more advertising?
But yes Xbox is the superior console as far as performance and all specs are concerned it beats PS2 in every way possible.