Without the Hunters it’s club officials signing players. Otherwise you’re paying for an operation out of NRL HQ. How many staff are you employing to do it? 4 to 5 full time salaries plus benefits is headed towards half a million. Look at the doc Perth Red posted. It’s $618k in grants. It’s about the same. So you can either pay the money to a bunch of suits or pay it to a club to actual have players run and get game time each week. By the way $222k is bugger all for DFAT spending and it’s never going to be spent in regional NSW or QLD, so it’s not taking anything away from those places. I don’t really buy the premise of your argument.
You know there's really no point in talking to you if you refuse to engage with what has actually been said...
Every one of your responses to me is just you trying to insert premises I don't hold into my argument, then me wasting my time fighting those premises. It's the weakest form of straw manning that wastes everybody's time and prevents the discussion moving forward in any productive manner.
I mean absolutely nobody, except you wink-wink, thought I was suggesting that DFAT would/could/should divert their grant from PNG to regional Australia FFS. I mean one of the main thrusts of my whole argument is that those sorts of government grants are unreliable, so I wouldn't even take it if they would consider offering such a grant to regional Australia, which I'm well aware will never happen BTW.
Framing my argument as giving the money to a 'bunch of suits' (which shows that you're absolutely clueless, dishonest, or both) or 'pay it to a club to actually have players run and get game time each week' is BS as well, but I pose the question to you; If PNG is supposedly bursting at the brim with talent just waiting for their shot at the NRL (which is what most people posit), and your stated purpose of supporting the Hunters is to 'guarantee' a pro pathway for Papuan players to the NRL, then why has only one/two(?) ex-Hunters made it as regular NRL players in their almost decade of existence?
If your method was so effective you'd expect at least half a dozen players to have made their way into the NRL by now, but it hasn't happened. In other words the Hunters aren't even achieving the goal you expect them to, so why would you waste resources on clones of them?
BTW, the Hunters annual report doesn't include other grants the Australian government and NRL have made into the Hunters and other supporting infrastructure in PNG RL over the past decade. Those grants would be in the tens of millions by now, and the Minister for Sport
recently announced a further $2.2mil two months ago. All that money stacks up, the Hunters and progress in junior development in PNG wouldn't be sustainable without it, and you wouldn't need to invest anywhere near as much into programs in Australia, or NZ for that matter. NZ is a whole other discussion though.