What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Pre-draft thread

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,348
CyberKev said:
None better on offer than Hansen, my good man. ;-)

But I would rather take a ruckman at no2. That is my point. It is a lose-lose situation. We take Hansen, Luxemberg won't go lower than 5.So which one would I rather. Well if I had to choose I'd go Luxemberg. Hille is like Jolly, great backup ruckman but not a great 1st choice ruckman that is going to win flags!
 

CyberKev

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
2,323
lockyno1 said:
But I would rather take a ruckman at no2. That is my point. It is a lose-lose situation. We take Hansen, Luxemberg won't go lower than 5.So which one would I rather. Well if I had to choose I'd go Luxemberg. Hille is like Jolly, great backup ruckman but not a great 1st choice ruckman that is going to win flags!

I totally agree with you, I'm just hoping like hell that the Essendon recruiting staff don't.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,785
we got a sh*t load of ruckmen, I cant remmember us ever being short of ruckmen

any midfielders up for grabs ?
 

CyberKev

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
2,323
Twizzle said:
we got a sh*t load of ruckmen, I cant remmember us ever being short of ruckmen

any midfielders up for grabs ?

Joel Selwood may still be available at 7, in which case I'm sure that Geelong would pounce.

More likely they'll be thinking heavily about picking up Daniel Connors, Leroy Jetta or even possibly Travis Boak.

Connors can do a bit of inside and out and would seem the safest option, but there's a lot of X-Factor about Jetta, and Boak is starting to gnerate some late hype.

I agree Geelong will probably nail a midfielder, although they may find James Sellar hard to go past if he's still around at 7.
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
153,785
I think I read that our no one pick will be Jumpin' Jack Hawkins young bloke, who is another ruck/key position player, but he's such a gun they wont pass him up, and apparently we get him under the father and son rule.

Most drafts that I have seen involve 16 and 17 year old players that never make it to the AFL.
 

CyberKev

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
2,323
Twizzle said:
I think I read that our no one pick will be Jumpin' Jack Hawkins young bloke, who is another ruck/key position player, but he's such a gun they wont pass him up, and apparently we get him under the father and son rule.

Tom Hawkins is a fantastic pick-up under father/son and would surely have gone top five otherwise.

Twizzle said:
Most drafts that I have seen involve 16 and 17 year old players that never make it to the AFL.

1) You cannot be drafted at 16, you must be aged over 17 and a half to be picked up and the vast majority of players drafted are 18 year olds.

2) All players in the competition come through the draft, initially.

3) Junior football practices, processes and talent identification methods have improved markedly in recent years and will only continue to improve. As such, we'll see more and more first and second round picks going on to have strong to brilliant careers. While we'll still see some surprise gems picked-up with lower picks, there'll be a lot less than occurred during the 90s when identification methods were vastly weaker.
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,348
CyberKev said:
I totally agree with you, I'm just hoping like hell that the Essendon recruiting staff don't.

Well I should audition for a spot on the Essendon staff then!:lol:
 

CyberKev

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
2,323
http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/footy/common/story_page/0,8033,20731759%255E20322,00.html

The big Berger continues to generate more heat than an African foundry in summertime!

The following line continues the big tease:

David Davutovic said:
Despite his enormous potential, the East Perth giant could slip as low as No. 6 in the November 25 draft because of the way the cards have fallen.

If I no longer believe in the Easter Bunny how can I genuinely believe in the prospect of this?! :crazy:
 

CyberKev

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
2,323
Twizzle said:
so would I

Connors would be a good get for Geelong, but I still think you'll run with Leroy Jetta (also a good get) and Connors will slip to the Saints.

The pacy pairing of Varcoe and Jetta out wide for the Cats would give the side some much needed grunt, given that they're currently too pedestrian and blue-collar in the midfield for my likeing.
 

CyberKev

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
2,323
lockyno1 said:
f**king Essendon you idiots! We need a friken ruckman!

Gumbleton, Brown & Houli would be a fantastic trio for the Bombers, Lockmeister.

I do agree, however, that you need to snare a ruckman somewhere.

You'd think that if Essendon nailed the above players with their first three picks then they'd use pick 36 on Sam Jacobs, who I don't believe will last until Hawthorn's pick 56.
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,348
f**k off, get Luxemberg at 2 then we have no dramas. I'd rather him over any of the mids, unless Gibbs is not taken at no1.
 

Smartman

Juniors
Messages
2,155
The Bergman will be gone within the top 5 which rules Hawthorn out.

The Hawks will either pick Sellar or Thorp.

My top 6

1.Gibbs
2.Gumbelton
3.Hansen
4.Selwood
5.Luenberger
6.Thorp or Sellar
 

CyberKev

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
2,323
lockyno1 said:
Luemberger better go no2, otherwise i'll be dead set spewing!

You may have to have that bucket at the ready then, young man!

The word is growing louder that Essendon wants to "rumble with the Gumble"...
 

Latest posts

Top