What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Quality of Knights mercy would not be strained if Cooper Vuna given second chance

Pumba

First Grade
Messages
8,542
Quality of Knights mercy would not be strained if Cooper Vuna given second chance
BY ROBERT DILLON

NEWCASTLE Knights management deserve to be commended for the disciplinary policies they have introduced in recent years.

In the current climate, the need for players to abide by a code of conduct and uphold a squeaky-clean image has never been more important.

But the case of young winger Cooper Vuna presents an intriguing dilemma for Newcastle's disciplinary committee.

Vuna, as has been widely reported, will front Newcastle Local Court on July 7 after allegedly being caught driving with a suspended licence twice in the space of seven days.

He faces up to two years in jail if convicted. He will also have to appear before Newcastle's disciplinary committee and has been stood down from playing in Newcastle's NRL team until the legal process is complete.

Knights chief executive Steve Burraston has already warned that terminating Vuna's contract is an option.

Rules are rules, but some may query whether such a punishment would be too harsh.

If Vuna is proven guilty in court, then some form of sanction from his club would appear inevitable.

Sacking him, however, would seem remarkably severe.

Just compare Vuna's alleged indiscretions with other high-profile incidents at other clubs.

Manly were willing to continue selecting Brett Stewart after he was charged with sexual assault.

Gold Coast kept picking Anthony Laffranchi when he was facing rape charges that were eventually dismissed. The Roosters fined young hooker Jake Friend $10,000 and stood him down for two weeks on a high-range drink-driving charge.

Friend's teammates Anthony Cherrington and Setaimata Sa have continued to play for the Roosters after being convicted on separate assault charges and ordered to complete community service.

Then just this week, Greg Bird was freed to play the rest of the season with French Super League club Catalans, after being released on bail following his 16-month jail sentence for glassing his girlfriend.

Vuna's alleged misdemeanours are not even in the same ballpark as some of those scandals.

Knights officials should also consider that they recruited the Tongan international as a naive 19-year-old who had never lived away from his parents' home in Auckland.

He now has a partner and two-year-old son to support.

But perhaps the most compelling argument that Vuna deserves a measure of leniency from his club is one of his own teammates.

Newcastle signed Wes Naiqama at the start of the 2008 season after he had recently completed four months of periodic detention, having been convicted not twice, but four times, of driving while disqualified.

The Knights gave Naiqama a second chance.

Maybe Vuna deserves one too.

Herald
 

antonius

Coach
Messages
10,104
Some serious food for thought in that piece. Hard to argue with Dillons reasoning. Vuna does seem to be very naive. Anyway it's good he's decided he wants to stay and get back into first grade.
 

Burwood

First Grade
Messages
5,008
I didn't like that article at all when I first read it this morning as Dillon seems to contradict himself on a few occasions.

NEWCASTLE Knights management deserve to be commended for the disciplinary policies they have introduced in recent years.

It's true. I am happy that the club seems to be taking a very serious approach towards player discipline and maintaining the image of the club.

Vuna's alleged misdemeanours are not even in the same ballpark as some of those scandals.

So are you commending Knights management for their disciplinary policies, or saying that they are too harsh compared to other clubs?

I don't really care if other clubs choose to go easy on their players, as long as our club maintains it's image and treats player incidents consistently.

Knights officials should also consider that they recruited the Tongan international as a naive 19-year-old who had never lived away from his parents' home in Auckland.

True again. Cooper was only young when he came to the club.

He now has a partner and two-year-old son to support.

So we should go easy on him because he came to the club as a "naive" boy, however, he is somehow mature enough to bring a child into this world? How much life experience is needed to pay a fine when it is mailed to your address? Surely it has to be less than raising a kid?

The Knights gave Naiqama a second chance.

Maybe Vuna deserves one too.

Different kettle of fish IMHO. Naiqama was at another club and faced their (not to mention the law's) discipline action. Vuna is at our club and should face our disciplinary action.

Having said all that, I hope Vuna cops a fine, a bit of a slap on the cheek to knock some sense into him, and he never looks back!
 

Pika

Bench
Messages
3,641
You cannot compare Vuna to wes.

Wes was contracted to the Dragons and broke his contract with them. Nothing to do with us.

Vuna on the other hand has a contract with the Knights, and he has broken that contract.
 

Alex28

Coach
Messages
12,021
I agree that he doesn't deserve to be punted...however given we won a bunch of games at the start of the season without him I don't agree that we NEED him. He is dispensable - he can't do what he wants without any consequences.
 

Alex28

Coach
Messages
12,021
We have plenty of cases where we have given other players second chances...but do we keep giving chance after chance just because we've dished out some second chances? Not suggesting that Cooper should be punted at all, but just because we gave Sargent and Naiqama second chances does not mean we should be lenient either...
 

Mad Goanna

Juniors
Messages
200
We have plenty of cases where we have given other players second chances...but do we keep giving chance after chance just because we've dished out some second chances? Not suggesting that Cooper should be punted at all, but just because we gave Sargent and Naiqama second chances does not mean we should be lenient either...

i.e. Terence Seu Seu
 

Big Tim

First Grade
Messages
6,500
Difference with Sargeant and Wes: We gave them a second chance after their previous clubs discarded them.
 

Latest posts

Top