What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Raiders lose again

ozbash

Referee
Messages
26,922
woolfords was the reason behind the sin bin threat. it was a blatent high shot which deserved a send off.

seuseu hit both davico and shifkofski with his shoulder, both of the sorry pricks milked it for all it was worth, davico in particular.
 

Raider Azz

Bench
Messages
4,547
woolfords was the reason behind the sin bin threat. it was a blatent high shot which deserved a send off.
If it was such a "blatant high shot which deserved a send off", pray tell me, why was Woolford not charged today?
 

hrundi99

First Grade
Messages
8,415
You are deadset kidding.

Statue was hit with SeuSeu's upper arm (bicep), not his shoulder.

Milked it? f**k off you idiot.
 

greeneyed

First Grade
Messages
8,135
If the try was scored on the 7th tackle, where is the official complaint from the Warriors club? Surely it is a mistake of such massive proportions that it ought to be exposed and the ref held accountable? There is NOTHING about this "7th tackle" anywhere in the media.... where is the proof?
 

Raider Azz

Bench
Messages
4,547
Never have I seen a WINNING team whinge as much as this. And they said we were just a bunch of sooks!
 

ozbash

Referee
Messages
26,922
hrundi99 said:
You are deadset kidding.

Statue was hit with SeuSeu's upper arm (bicep), not his shoulder.

Milked it? f**k off you idiot.

now now, dont lose the plot hyundi,
did you see the game ?
both of gerrys tackles were hard, but they were clean.davico went to get up from his horrific injury and the trainer told him to lie down !!

as for the 7th tackle,, the raiders were going for the line and were held up on the 5th tackle, the tv screen and the ref did not count the return to the 10 metre mark and resuming as the 5th but the 4th which had already been counted.

confused ?
thought as much :lol: :lol: :lol:
 

ozbash

Referee
Messages
26,922
greeneyed said:
If the try was scored on the 7th tackle, where is the official complaint from the Warriors club? Surely it is a mistake of such massive proportions that it ought to be exposed and the ref held accountable? There is NOTHING about this "7th tackle" anywhere in the media.... where is the proof?

why should we make an official complaint and lower ourselves to your level.
not our fault the ref cant count.
speaking of complaints you f**king fairies, why did elliot whinge to the nrl about stacey jones wearing 7 instead of 6 ?

bet your f**king dinky di media never reported that either.

what a pack of blouses. :roll:
 

hrundi99

First Grade
Messages
8,415
ozbash said:
hrundi99 said:
You are deadset kidding.

Statue was hit with SeuSeu's upper arm (bicep), not his shoulder.

Milked it? f**k off you idiot.

now now, dont lose the plot hyundi,
did you see the game ?
both of gerrys tackles were hard, but they were clean.davico went to get up from his horrific injury and the trainer told him to lie down !!

His jaw hit his bicep.

Look at it again for f**k's sake.

I'm pretty biased but you take the cake. I think you need a new glasses prescription.

They weren't clean at all. :roll:
 
Messages
4,007
I think the principle of not believing what the media says applies to this supposed scoring on the seventh tackle, there have been numerous times this season where the tele has had it wrong.

I saw the monaghan tackle and I thought he landed on the upper back/lower neck area, even if he didnt, he was still lifted above the parallel which is illegal whether it was intended or not, the seu seu shot on schifcofske was crap, even your biased kiwi commentators who were so intent on concentrating on the warriors all day said that schifcofske isnt the easiest person to get a shot on.

We didnt really convert any of our opportunities, I for one would like to bloody know why McLinden was kept off.

The players from the warriors deserve suspension for the tackles, kneeing a smaller bloke in the balls is a deplorable act, head hunting like he did was stupid aswell.

But fair enough, the warriors were on the right side of the scoreboard at the right time of the game.
 

hrundi99

First Grade
Messages
8,415
ozbash said:
speaking of complaints you f***ing fairies, why did elliot whinge to the nrl about stacey jones wearing 7 instead of 6 ?

bet your f***ing dinky di media never reported that either.

what a pack of blouses. :roll:

The Warriors broke an NRL rule. It is worthy of being called on.

Blouses? Give me a break.
 

greeneyed

First Grade
Messages
8,135
It was reported that your club owner deliberately told him he could wear 7 and he knew it would attract an NRL fine and did it anyway and he didn't care. Can't complain about a fine in those circumstances.

What is "lowering" about asking the NRL to look at an allegation that a try was scored on the 7th? It is an obvious thing to do if there is any truth in the matter. Your club obviously doesn't think it is correct.
 

AuckMel

Bench
Messages
2,959
greeneyed said:
It was reported that your club owner deliberately told him he could wear 7 and he knew it would attract an NRL fine and did it anyway and he didn't care. Can't complain about a fine in those circumstances.

I guess when you've got millions of dollars, some poultry fine isn't going to hurt.

greeneyed said:
What is "lowering" about asking the NRL to look at an allegation that a try was scored on the 7th? It is an obvious thing to do if there is any truth in the matter. Your club obviously doesn't think it is correct.

Who cares now anyway? We won, and that's all that matters.
 

greeneyed

First Grade
Messages
8,135
This thread got started by a Norths supporter or a St George supporter or a Steelers supporter or something like that.... we are simply reacting to the completely and patently ridiculous stuff posted on it by Warriors supporters.
 
Top