greeneyed said:
Ale is a Knights junior.
The Raiders make big junior development efforts right through far southern NSW.
The Roosters not only sign other club's juniors who have been developed through to first grade. They sign them up at Flegg level eg Soward, who is ALSO a Raiders junior.
The Roosters cannot complain one bit when someone signs someone they themselves have poached!
This whole "Junior" business is getting silly now.... since everyone seems to think that their town "owns" their players. From the thread, it sounds like Ale left the knights for a better opportunity and left the roosters for a better opportunity... yet the roosters "stole" him??? "poached" him??c'on gimme a break.
It is a 2 way deal. who would continue to play for a club to remain "loyal" or whatever if u have the an established first grader in front of you and you know the club has already committed to him?? My comment on this is that it is your management's responsibility to retian the player and make him believe that he is wanted and has a future there.
and this compensation/tfr fees of jnrs etc. - the cap theoretically should already advantage teams with the big jnr bases, since they could get good rookies for cheap. if put in - it would also provides an unfair advantage to teams like brisbane who have an entire state to choose from.
however, the cap does not help Melbourne and warriors, since they are finding it difficult to get ppl to relocate down there so would have to pay a premium for players to go thereby burning their cap.
It would also be silly if you looked at the demographics of the people in eastern suburbs of syd vs ppl in canberra or penrith... a lot more older ppl living in syd due to expensive property.. prob more union based now...its not like how the club was or the city was back in the early 1900s.