titoelcolombiano
First Grade
- Messages
- 6,662
Have a free rep week.
That could work but Catalans are not releasing players post-season so I don't see them releasing them mid-season
Have a free rep week.
Not sure what the answer is then other than the dragons sharing the load with a Toulouse side in super league and other English based super league sides and Toronto who have French players??That could work but Catalans are not releasing players post-season so I don't see them releasing them mid-season
Not sure what the answer is then other than the dragons sharing the load with a Toulouse side in super league and other English based super league sides and Toronto who have French players??
Can’t see that ever been accepted as Toronto could rightfully ask for it too.I actually like your idea about a French player quota for Catalans and Toulouse, I would just want to make sure that all of these French players are benefitting the national team.
Maybe a deal can be struck that Toulouse and Catalans will be exempt from relegation in exchange for a quota of French players and an iron clad agreement that those players will be released during set rep windows (namely mid-year test weekend and the October-November international window).
Can’t see that ever been accepted as Toronto could rightfully ask for it too.
The only way around this is for some sort of conference setup with either a European conference or a international conference that includes French&north American sides alongside a U.K. conference which includes promotion and relegation.
My ideal scenario would be in the short term to incrementally increase super league to 16 teams to include Toulouse, Ottawa and New York over 2-3 years before creating a 5 team international conference for said teams alongside Catalan and Toronto.I wouldn't disagree with that. As another poster suggested previously, P&R for English clubs (if they choose to) and licencing for non-English clubs.
I think RL as a whole is better off moving towards away from P&R anyway, football can afford it because they are a bigger sport but it is detrimental to RL's expansion plans and in some cases is downright devastating.
I wouldn't disagree with that. As another poster suggested previously, P&R for English clubs (if they choose to) and licencing for non-English clubs.
I think RL as a whole is better off moving towards away from P&R anyway, football can afford it because they are a bigger sport but it is detrimental to RL's expansion plans and in some cases is downright devastating.
My ideal scenario would be in the short term to incrementally increase super league to 16 teams to include Toulouse, Ottawa and New York over 2-3 years before creating a 5 team international conference for said teams alongside Catalan and Toronto.
Yes. But like I’ve said before I think you’d need the mind of Stephen Hawkins to workout a fixture format between both conferences.In this scenario would you keep P&R for the English conference?
Yes. But like I’ve said before I think you’d need the mind of Stephen Hawkins to workout a fixture format between both conferences.