By your username you have never seen us win anything, have you ? Are you also into turd polishing?
If Sivo , Lussick and Lane play next week the coach is a bigger dope than I thought he was. Simonsson is fast but has no football smarts. Sanders I'd be trying to offload to Canberra ASAP. I'd take Čotrić or Savage off their hands. I'd also buy Trey Mooney and tap Paulo on the shoulder and tell him it's over. He has been shit this year. RCG is also one I'd consider releasing but only at full freight. Next year they will be even worse and further regress.
Definitely not another Hayne, tho doesn’t have to beYeah, man - that's all I'm saying.
I think he's a talented kid, but I've spoken to people (not on this forum) who see him as the next coming of Hayne, o Lyon.
Thing is, with Hayne, and Lyon, is was apparent very early on in their First Grade careers that they were generational players - they just had "it".
I think Blaize Talagi is a fine player, who will only get better - but right now, personally, I can't see the "it" factor in him.
And that's ok - not even player needs to be a generational talent.
Well everyone in here knows more than Bea Arthur ffs!!I can at least go to sleep knowing I know more about footy than one more person in this world. Like I said before you are just an absolute flog with no idea
Exactly right - nothing wrong with being an above average talent.Definitely not another Hayne, tho doesn’t have to be
He can also score every try that Sivo can. Every single one from 5 metres out.Tend to agree if Moses is fit let Sanders go Canberra and take Mooney from them..
Cotric is off contract for next year as well he isn't worth the 650 he currently is on maybe 300k but is better than Sivo..
You are missing the fact we dominated the game. I hear all the sooks crying that they were missing Reynolds and we still lost 13 plus.... We were missing Moses and gutho. Our two biggest attacking weapons.Again, what am I missing? This was a very poor performance. Beaten 13+ by a team without their key player (or at the very least, one of their two key players). Since when does being beaten by 16 at homenbecome an acceptable standard? This was not good. We are f**ked for the foreseeable future.
A disappointing loss, certainly but not a bad performance for most of it. Yes they were Reynolds but we were missing Gutho, Mitch, and Carty and had two rookies in our spine.Again, what am I missing? This was a very poor performance. Beaten 13+ by a team without their key player (or at the very least, one of their two key players). Since when does being beaten by 16 at homenbecome an acceptable standard? This was not good. We are f**ked for the foreseeable future.
The only thing that matters is the scoreboard.You are missing the fact we dominated the game.
Ever coached in any capacity?Well everyone in here knows more than Bea Arthur ffs!!
I can do my own shoelaces up.Ever coached in any capacity?
Well f off and support someone else and stop crying like a little baby cause we lost. You need to grow a set of balls and accept a loss mateThe only thing that matters is the scoreboard.
So noI can do my own shoelaces up.
Me>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bea Arthur.
Sweet as, pleased that the table accounts for Moses and Gutherson missing. That’ll be handy come the end of the year when the table is balanced.You are missing the fact we dominated the game. I hear all the sooks crying that they were missing Reynolds and we still lost 13 plus.... We were missing Moses and gutho. Our two biggest attacking weapons.
He chased him to keep the Captains wife happy.In the NRL Joey Lussick has a win percentage of 37%. BA chased this guy mid season last year to be our first choice hooker. 37%. Let that sink in.
Crying? You are the only one losing the plot at several people on the internet. Take a break championWell f off and support someone else and stop crying like a little baby cause we lost. You need to grow a set of balls and accept a loss mate
You are an absolute negative flog. That's all that needs to be said
Just go to bed merkin
I can at least go to sleep knowing I know more about footy than one more person in this world. Like I said before you are just an absolute flog with no idea
Yeah, man - that's all I'm saying.
I think he's a talented kid, but I've spoken to people (not on this forum) who see him as the next coming of Hayne, or Lyon.
Thing is, with Hayne, and Lyon, it was apparent very early on in their First Grade careers that they were generational players - they just had "it".
I think Blaize Talagi is a fine player, who will only get better - but right now, personally, I can't see the "it" factor in him.
And that's ok - not even player needs to be a generational talent.