Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
He could have a high ceiling. He has a high work rate, very good off loader and played origin in his second season of first grade. He needs to cut out the handling errors and missed tackles under fatigue to get there.
He could. But do you think he does? I don't. I wonder what @The Predictor would say.
He was pretty damn good in his first season with us. Most of the criticism is recency bias. Let’s hope it’s just a poor run of form instead of a terminal decline.
That's how probability works. Sorry I can't give you more certainty. Life's like a box of chocolates.
Don't be sorry, I'm sorry for you and all the splinters you must have in your groinal region from perpetually sitting on the fence and adding net zero (probability) value.
It's the way he was used. He was a focal point of the attack, in a year where a couple of our best forwards (and Dylan Brown) were unavailable a lot of the time. But we also played very risky footy that year (and the next), going from one of the best at set completion (2021-22) to one of the worst.
It makes me sad that you don't value my contribution but hopefully I can give someone out there a better understanding of probability and determinism in rugby league. We know Weidler isn't going to write about it. Because he knows the market.
Fair enough.
I'd say the probability of that is... unlikely.
Who? Who cares.... Are you setting yourself up as the forum's alternative to Danny Weidler... Dunny Weirdo, perhaps?
Huh? You mean Tracksuitman...
