Avenger
Immortal
- Messages
- 35,724
Off the field, he was. Maybe he’s changed now.Some people would be of the opinion that if you cheat on your pregnant wife, you’re a prick. Some wouldn’t.
Off the field, he was. Maybe he’s changed now.Some people would be of the opinion that if you cheat on your pregnant wife, you’re a prick. Some wouldn’t.
Find a moral compassthumbs down dude, get over yourself.
Round 23When is Adam Ritson back?
Maybe he has. Doesn’t change the fact that he did something that’s morally repugnant.Off the field, he was. Maybe he’s changed now.
I actually think you're spot on. It's his 'meh' factor.Brown is toxic to this team
No I don’t. What I’m saying is it’s irrelevant to footy. He is not a convicted criminal but morally flawed. When it comes to footy it’s irrelevant.Ok mate, you do you. Why wouldn’t you f**k about on your missus who’s about to spit out your first kid.
Yep. And to play Lussick for so long to start with.Poor decision from Ryles to sub Lussick on for Papalii
Those three are fringe players who arguably there were players in the 17 tonight just as capable.Tuaviti, Simonson, Moretti
Part of me thinks that's why we went after DeBelin in the first place. I think in 2026 Hopgood starts getting the Cartwright, Lane and Matterson treatment in Cup.Lussick was poor, no doubt, but Hopgood wasn’t any better. In fact, he had a shocker. Dylan Walker completely exposed his limitations — he’s just not the elite lock some make him out to be. If this is the standard he offers in big games, then the club really needs to think long and hard about his long-term role. Personally, I’d be moving him on and shifting Jack de Belin into the No. 13 jersey come 2026. At least with De Belin, you get toughness, effort, and defensive steel — three things that were sorely missing.
100%. Why can't they be challenged? Sheer stupidity. The NRL really need to leave the rules up to me.Couldn’t. Voss explained it in the coverage. Touchie glad can’t be challenged. Which is f**king stupid, because the merkins are merkins
Our coaches are always infallible, that’s why you never questioned a thing BA did, right?No I don’t. What I’m saying is it’s irrelevant to footy. He is not a convicted criminal but morally flawed. When it comes to footy it’s irrelevant.
OUR COACH AGREES WITH ME. Now f**k off.
With all due respect, sometimes I get the feeling you wouldnt be happy with our squad unless we have 17 Origin and International players.Those three are fringe players who arguably there were players in the 17 tonight just as capable.
Agree to disagree mate. All 3 would be in that side if they were fit.Those three are fringe players who arguably there were players in the 17 tonight just as capable.
Isn't being morally flawed the definition of a prick...?Yes, really. He was found not guilty wasn’t he? Is he a prick because he is morally flawed?
Jesus Christ mate, you’re so dense that light must bend around you. What a failure Iongi is then conceding 34 points.
Williams and Hopgood are both better defenders so they started. Paulo starts to give us some punch. You need toilers on your bench to rest the starters.Poor coaching/selection. If he's a defender he should have been starting (or brought on at 20min) to improve some of the pathetic first half defensive patterns.
Tuivaiti or Moretti would've been picked if they were available. Or possibly Lane.Otherwise it was a wasted spot in teh 17 that could have been better utilised.
Says the person who blamed the loss on Lomax (instead of anything in the first half), and so comes away with the award for dumbest post in this thread...With all due respect, sometimes I get the feeling you wouldnt be happy with our squad unless we have 17 Origin and International players.
Well, unfortunately we don’t start the game with a points handicap for our players’ first grade experience.But Iongi has only played 14-15 games so that 20 is pretty bad for a 200+ fullback
You sound like you get into a relationship and then engage in controlling conduct to me. You get a moral compass.Find a moral compass
It’s an assault on his character. Morally flawed is the literal definition of the word prick.Yes, really. He was found not guilty wasn’t he? Is he a prick because he is morally flawed?