What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rd6: 735pm Eels v Raiders GAME DAY THREAD in Darwin 12/4/25

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
93,770
Yes, both great examples of how declining to activate a PO is giving it up, whether you sign a new contract with better conditions for us, or elsewhere.
It's impossible to decline to activate a PO if you don't have the option to do so. Just as it's impossible to activate it if you don't have it. So nobody 'gave up' their PO, other than Brown, who gave up the PO that would've come due in 2027.
 
Messages
12,897
It's impossible to decline to activate a PO if you don't have the option to do so.
Except when you yourself made the choice to take a different option, thus declining/giving up the PO in your favour rather than activating it. Pretty simple really.
So nobody 'gave up' their PO, other than Brown, who gave up the PO that would've come due in 2027.
It would have only 'come due' if he elected to trigger it.

Everyone who doesn't elect to trigger their PO is declining to do so... whatever the reason. Signing a new deal with a different club is the same as signing a new deal with us on different terms - in both situations the player declines/gives up the option to trigger any PO that was in they/them/their favour.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
93,770
Except when you yourself made the choice to take a different option, thus declining/giving up the PO in your favour rather than activating it. Pretty simple really.

It would have only 'come due' if he elected to trigger it.

Everyone who doesn't elect to trigger their PO is declining to do so... whatever the reason. Signing a new deal with a different club is the same as signing a new deal with us on different terms - in both situations the player declines/gives up the option to trigger any PO that was in they/them/their favour.
You were talking about players giving up the PO as though they didn't want the option any longer. Choosing or declining to activate it (or signing an even longer extension) means they did take the option. It's only future options that they can give up, as in the case of Drown.
 
Messages
12,897
You were talking about players giving up the PO as though they didn't want the option any longer.
No, I was talking about people choosing not to take up the PO that they'd haggled for in their previous contract negotiations, for whatever reason.
Choosing or declining to activate it (or signing an even longer extension) means they did take the option.
Huh... um... So declining to activate the PO means they did take it up? Even if they signed and registered a contract with totally different conditions? That's no different to just signing a new contract fresh off the street, so can't mean that they "took up" the PO.
It's only future options that they can give up, as in the case of Drown.
Either you're drunk again Pou, or you've argued POs so much that you've painted yourself into a very narrow definitional corner.
 
Top