What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Record companies - why they are pure evil

Godz Illa

Coach
Messages
18,745
Epic isn't releasing Fiona Apple's new album because they believe it lacks 'commercial appeal'. FYI Fiona Apple has 2 platinum albums and millions of cool fans like myself. Her new album, produced by the genius Jon Brion, is completed, and I am beside myself with anticipation - which has since turned to anger. Sign the petition - free Fiona.


http://www.freefiona.com/

Petition Seeks to Free Fiona Apple Album

Wed Dec 22, 3:17 PM ET Entertainment - AP Music


By BRUNO J. NAVARRO, Associated Press Writer

NEW YORK - Fiona Apple fans wondering when the artist's third CD would see the light of day might want to keep an eye on one enthusiast's online petition.

Dave Muscato, a Missouri musician and Apple afficionado, founded the Web site www.freefiona.com last month in an effort to pressure her record label to release "Extraordinary Machine." Apple's follow-up to "Tidal" and "When the Pawn ..." reportedly has been finished since May 2003.

"They didn't think it had enough commercial appeal to justify the cost of promoting it and distributing it," Muscato recently told AP Radio. "So even though it was already recorded, they'd already spent the money to record it, they basically decided to just cut their losses and stick it on a shelf."

A message left at Epic Records, Apple's label, was not immediately returned Monday.

For every signature on Muscato's petition, the Free Fiona! campaign plans to send a fake apple to Andrew Lack, the CEO of parent company Sony BMG, "as a symbol of protest and support for Fiona Apple," he said. A demonstration outside Sony headquarters in New York is also planned on Jan. 28.

As of Monday, the Web site has gathered more than 2,600 signatures. It also raised nearly $1,000 from donations and sales of T-shirts and bumper stickers, Muscato said.

"It's really taken off faster than I thought," he said.

Muscato, 20, says he had heard a couple of tracks from the unreleased album that were leaked on the Internet, so he's not worried he's going through all this trouble for an album that might not be worth it.

"Even if it's no good, which I'm sure isn't the case, I would at least like to buy it and decide that for myself," he said.
 

SpaceMonkey

Immortal
Messages
40,731
It sucks when record companies do that sort of thing. If they aren't going to release it they should at least allow the artist to release the song on an independent label. They can always cohoose to pick up the distribution later if it sells well anyway.
Major labels suck arse, and the sooner that the online distribution of music cuts them out of the loop the better.
 

fat_mike

Juniors
Messages
1,181
the problem with major record labels is the label believes the artists is working for them. i feel it should be viewed the other way around. the label should be working for the artists to get the best out of them. indie labels like epitaph records and fat wreck chords are perfect examples. they are there to work for the artists not the other way around. the artists/s are the single most important people on any record label. major labels are bad news in my opinion. hopefully fiona apple will wake up and get a deal with a decent label who is willing to back themusic she see thinks is good enough to release. she's a proven seller and shouldnt have any trouble moving the discs
 
Messages
2,839
I hate major record companies......Interscope.....Sony.......I swear they would stab anyone in the back, even their own mums if it meant an extra couple of albums sold.
 

Alex28

Coach
Messages
12,011
There is a doco about Wilco called "I Am Trying To Break Your Heart" about the making of their album Yankee Hotel Foxtrot, and the subsequent rejection of the album by the record company. Long story short - Reprise (a Warner Company) ended up giving Wilco the album (after paying US$70K to make it), then the highest bidder for the album was Nonesuch Records - who paid 3 times what it cost to make. The really good thing is that Nonesuch is also a Warner company :)

It is a gripping watch...and highlights what a monumental f**k up Reprise made - a record that "did not have a single" became a critical success and sold over 2 Million copies worldwide.

Seems record companies have not learned a thing...
 

Latest posts

Top