- Messages
- 34,682
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11685317
Pretty damning for the refs
Pretty damning for the refs
Sadly, I think you are right. The day a ref does it, he'll be the worst person in the world. I do think they need to penalise it though....it is the rules of our gameAgree. But they can't now cos they haven't done it ever.
First GP game...manly v parra..manly penalty...Walker goal =))
I cannot think of a golden point game determined by an offside penalty. I've never seen a more blatant example of players getting offside in GP than tonight.
lol @ the notion that the warriors are playing by the rules in GP and no one else is. I can't remember if it was GP or close to the end of the game but remember when they had a wall if players in front of the play the ball in an attempt to block roosters chasers a couple years back?
Anyways, all teams blatantly break the rules in GP. I remember the roosters/wests 2010 semi, both sides were at least 3m offside for every tackle of extra time.
I'm probably not explaining it right. IIRC a manly player made a break, passed it and was knocked down by a parra player. A parra player who was infront of him the picked up the ball. So it was a blatant offside.
And the dragons won GP in round 26 last year when Farah was called offside after charging down a field goal attempt. However I'm confident that's the only time a penalty for being inside the 10 has been called.
The article would have had a lot more credibility if it had at least acknowledged that fact. As it stands, it's just another biased rant.And yeah- Warriors are certainly not guiltless. Not on Saturday or v Manly at least.
The golden point period was shambolic tonight. The ref needs to bite the bullet and penalise for offside in golden point.
The article would have had a lot more credibility if it had at least acknowledged that fact. As it stands, it's just another biased rant.
So what happens then is the team that wins the toss and receives the kickoff either gets a nice clean 10 and gets their field goal, or they get a penalty and get into position that way. It would make golden point just a toss of the coin.
Better just to get rid of it altogether.
It was actually a wrong call, I remember there being a big two page story about it in one of the papers with images that showed the player and ball were behind the point of contact so it wasn't offside. It was Matt Petersen though so whatever.Yes but that was when a player picked up a ball from an offside position. Even the refs today would have had to penalise that. Well I think they would..
The article would have had a lot more credibility if it had at least acknowledged that fact. As it stands, it's just another biased rant.
The article would have had a lot more credibility if it had at least acknowledged that fact. As it stands, it's just another biased rant.