What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rnd4: v Titans

Bay56

First Grade
Messages
5,464
What can you say about Chris Ward ... this guy has rorted us before and is in the process of doing so again.

Add to that a try to the titans from a deadset forward pass and we have at least a 10 point turn-around.
 

Leethal

Juniors
Messages
450
The Titans were denied a fair try (which squares up for the Titans second try), but that call to deny Best's second try was an absolute travesty.

Ignore the touch judge and make a call based on an blurred freeze frame. So much for the benefit of the doubt.
 

bileduct

Coach
Messages
17,832
You have to ask yourself exactly why the f**k touch judges are on the field.

The TJ was no more than two meters away and was staring at Best's foot.

Surely the TJ has the best decision when considering the blurred video footage.

At worst it was a benefit of the doubt try or a Ref's Call.
 

bileduct

Coach
Messages
17,832
Carney's fifth tackle options have been very poor, and Weyman is showing signs of his frustrating worst.
 

bileduct

Coach
Messages
17,832
That's it.

Weyman needs to be cut from the team, indefinately.

I will not tolerate this overated hack penalising our team out of the game any longer.

Michael Weyman is the biggest Raiders myth in the history of the club.
 

Bay56

First Grade
Messages
5,464
What a f**king shambles.

I dont know what instructions henry goes out with when we play away but they seem to be the exact opposite of home ... instead of using our strength out wide we go up the middle with ineffective plays around Tilse.
 
Messages
45
That ref is f***ing kidding himself. First he robs us by giving the Titans a try off a forward pass that blind Freddy seen, then he rips us off again with the Colin Best try and now he sends Weyman off for a punch. I turned it off after the commentator's said "I can't believe that". I've had a gutful. The c**k should be dropped for next week no doubt. And a note to Finch or whoever is in charge of the ref's.....you can't make excuses for this dickhead mate, it is for all to see on the screen. Joke.
 

Timbo

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
20,281
Holy f**k mate. Seriously, that's so wrong.

Weyman made really good metres tonight, and was quite constant.

That's the weakest send off in the history of the game. We've been absolutely raped by the video and on-field referee tonight. We were never in this bloody game.

Seriously when was the last time a player was sent off for throwing a punch? And why wasn't Luke O'Dwyer sin binned for being a third man in throwing punches?

Ben Cummins: f**k off back to the Jim Beam Cup. That's about your refereeing standard you dick.
 

Bay56

First Grade
Messages
5,464
That's it.

Weyman needs to be cut from the team, indefinately.

I will not tolerate this overated hack penalising our team out of the game any longer.

Michael Weyman is the biggest Raiders myth in the history of the club.

settle down bile ... tonight he was the most effective forward we had in attack ... unfortunately he was sent off for an incident that he should not have been.
 

Bay56

First Grade
Messages
5,464
What I couldnt understand is why it took Henry so long to bring Weyman back on after his initial stint when he outplayed Luke Bailey and was clearly our best forward ...

... Weyman didnt look like he was puffing when he came off.

YOU DICKHEAD HENRY !!!
 

azza

Juniors
Messages
1,799
If they ever have another one of those before and after ads for impotence treatments, they should have the words "Canberra Raiders attack" in the before column.
 

Chachi

Bench
Messages
3,068
Weymans punch was stupid but as per usual the referees screwed us royally for any indescretion while turning a blind eye to the titans.

They were the better team on the night (in attack particularly), but we got shafted big time. The gap should have been 4 tries to 3 max.
 

Macko8

Juniors
Messages
1,369
the score didnt reflect the game imo

a few shocking decisions from the officials again lost out momentum.

carney is not a halfback,nor is campese a 5/8,which is why we cannot score points.
 

shear_joy9

Coach
Messages
13,743
canberra didn't lose because of the ref.

they lost because, as per season this season, they have absolutly no dominance of the ruck. Opposition teams easily make over 50m every set.

also as mentioned above, they offered nothing in attack. I can't recall Campese touching the ball in the 2nd half.
 
Messages
3,445
What ever happened after Best's disallowd try doesnt matter , the game changed ,it was at least a 10 point turn around, it was a deadset forward pass for the tities try , the ref said he was hit in the tackle , watch the replay the ball is passed before a raider hit him. Then they show a blurry replay ignore the touchies decision and disallow a try.
Deadset this game is f*cked, if these morons keep fu*king up the game is gonna be the laughing stock of professional sport.
Weyman should not of been sent off , it was not a King hit , he used that as justification for the send off , what a tossa , go back and ref U6's

As for our team wake up to yourselves and do something with the 5th tackle , totally disgusting tonight.
 

GC_Gladiator

Juniors
Messages
1,508
Weyman was shocking imo. In a five minute period he was involved in a forward pass, a knock on and a penalty for a fore arm to the face. The send off was deserved, i didn't see any provocation- and as raiders fans i think we all know that his one of the easiest to rile up in the league. He made 17 tackles, and missed 5 (according to NRL.COM (yeah i know how sh*t it the site is)).

I thought Miller and Picker were decent. Carney is not a half back, and from what i've seen this season i probably wouldn't give him the five eight role because his quite ineffective in defence. In form his a devastating ball runner but i think his still finding his feet this season.
 

GC_Gladiator

Juniors
Messages
1,508
Weyman should not of been sent off , it was not a King hit , he used that as justification for the send off , what a tossa , go back and ref U6's

I have got to respectfully disagree with you on that one there. I didn't seem to think it was warranted to let go of a punch. It didn't seem like they were both squaring up for it- i think he just let one go in a cattish fashion.
 
Messages
3,445
Cheap shot possibably , king hit no, sin bin definately , send off no.
In a fight someone is always going to throw the first punch , Conn was facing Weyman when he came forward , Conn got up from the tackle with his hands up , something happened in the tackle , Weyman fired up when the two first came together. I think it was dumb for what weyman done , and he'll agree , but you see this plenty of times a season and how often do you see them get sent off?
 

GC_Gladiator

Juniors
Messages
1,508
Yeah, it seemed a bit like mason and fielden in the test when mason clocked him. Could have gone either way but i don't really disagree with him being sent. Its not the first time his been sent off, how many has he had in the last couple of seasons?

Oh and no way it was a king hit- the ref was just a dork. Kind of like in good luck chuck if you've seen it.. "his blow jobbing her"
 

reptar

Juniors
Messages
911
It was hard to see this stuff at the ground. The stadium is impressive, I'm not too fussed with their EXTREMELY loud attempt to put off opposition fullbacks with the PA, though. Most unsportsman like. From my perspective at the ground, the difference between the teams was Scott Prince. He directed them around the ground, we had nothing in the halves. Neither side is a premiership contender, the Titans are one injury to Prince away from being as bad as us.
 

Latest posts

Top